The Practice of Groundedness with Brad Stulberg

https://youtu.be/7cWGKbyouhk

hey, simple passive cashflow listeners. Today, we are going to be talking with Brad Solberg, who is dropping his book It’s releasing this week, the practice of groundedness. We’d like to take a break from the real estate investing tax legal.

Infinite banking, which by the way, we’re also dropping the infinite banking e-course this week. If you guys want to pick that up, go to simplepassivecashflow.com/banking. A lot of you guys are high paid professionals, and what also say are really type a personalities , with the path to financial freedom, you guys realize that it actually is pretty simple.

But how do we create a well-rounded life with happiness and something that doesn’t pressure our soul, which we’re going to talk about today. Brad, thanks for coming on.

Yeah Lane thanks for having me on the show and a chance to talk to your community about the new book.

Talk to us about how you started down where did the book come from?

I like to think about this topic using the metaphor of a mountain and when most people see a mountain, the first thing that they notice is the peak.

That’s where their eyes go, everybody glances up. And the second thing that you’ll notice, particularly if it’s a striking or really prominent mountain is the slope, the steepness of it. No one ever looks at a mountain and says, wow, look at the base of that thing. Yet without a strong and solid base when rough weather comes, the peak and the slope, they can’t hold. They’re not stable. The mountain degrades over time. And in my own executive coaching practice, what I realized I worked with so many very high performing entrepreneurs, executives that have spent so much time focusing on the slope or the metaphorical peak of their mountains and not enough time tending to their foundations or that base.

And as a result, even though they experience great conventional success, they often feel a lack of fulfillment. I call this If-Then Syndrome. They tell themselves a story. If I get promoted into the C-suite, then I’ll be content. If I hit 2 million in saving, then I’ll be content. If I buy this house, then I’ll be content.

And what they find is that once they get to that place where they thought that they’d be content and fulfilled, they’re not. They still want more. Some of this is just. You’re driven. You’re high achieving. You want to strive for greatness, but if that striving for greatness gets way too unchecked, then you don’t have fun along the way.

You can’t experience joy. You constantly feel empty and that ultimately led me to explore , what would it look like to pursue success in a way that is more grounded? Hence the title of the book, the practice of grounded-ness. What does the latest research, what do you ancient wisdom traditions?

What do people that really practice this have to say about building and maintaining a strong foundation? A strong base on top of which any striving can . And the answer, it’s paradoxical. It’s not that you stop striving. You don’t become a monk in a Zen monastery, completely disconnected from the world.

What happens is you still strive, but the texture of that striving changes. It goes from a place of compulsion or need or fragility. To a place of fulfillment and strength. And that’s the practice of groundedness. And then the book, obviously as well, how do you develop this quality? What are the principles that make for a healthy foundation?

And we’ll dig into that a little bit more, personally, like I’ve literally done that in the last five to 10 years where, I have a journal in the form of a spreadsheet of course where I’ve written down, like when I get this, I will be happy when right. And every six months I’ve written stuff down.

10 years ago, it’s funny. It’s I’ll be happy when I have three rentals or 11 rentals, or when I, invest passively in my first invest our apartment. And then it was like moving away from Seattle to Hawaii or having this wanted like a C class Mercedes car. That was a big thing for me.

If you do this, you have to write this stuff down and you don’t just go on autopilot in life. You start to realize that when you put that flag in the sand or, summit the mountain one step over a period of time, you start to realize it’s endless maze, or it’s just a constant path. I would encourage everybody to go through that exercise. It’s probably going to take you guys a handful of years. You guys are really smart and like philosophical about this stuff. You guys will figure it out and maybe six to 12 months. Where are we go from there, Brad?

An exercise in the book in a huge part of the book and it walks readers through this is to reflect on what I call your core values. So these are the things that you most aspire to that make you who you are, or perhaps even if you really admire, look up to someone else, these are the things that you admire about them.

The qualities and characteristics that you see. And want to embody yourself. It could be things like health, creativity, love, family, community, vulnerability, presence, authenticity on and on. You pick between three and five of this. Then it’s super important to define them in very concrete terms.

Lane, let’s say that you tell me a core value of yours is community. That’s really ambiguous and broad. What does community mean to you? Give me one or two sentences and I’m asking you you don’t actually have to do it right now, but really get concrete. What does community mean? Let’s do the exercise.

I wouldn’t say community is a big for you, maybe like honor. Okay, great then how would you define it? Not having like spineless people that just take over on you and I want to personify that, right? I’m not just doing things for money or because it brings me, money in the bank, but do things that Sprite at the end of the day.

If you think about your day to day life or your week to week or month to month life, what practices can you engage in that represent honor?

Do things that make things better at the end of the day for majority of people not just driven by the bottom line, thinking if you can, and I know I’m putting you on the spot here, get even more concrete. What is that? Give me an action that does that.

I mean find people in my network and cut people out that don’t personify that. But then you have those people in your network how are you honorable with them? Okay it’s more for things I’m doing personally?

What are you doing? Yeah.

Trying to figure out how to help them, whether investors or employees.

I would push you to get even more concrete and maybe it is three times a month help an investor or an employee in a way that has nothing to do with your own success or bottom line. That then is how you practice honor.

 

What the book asks you to do is identify three to five of these core values, get really concrete. Like we just did into practices and then you show up and you practice those values consistently. Start at a very noble or honorable core value, and then you get all the way down to habits you can practice.

And that helps ground you in the present moment because regardless if you get that C class or you get that house or you get that passive income, whatever it is y ou can show up today, act in alignment with your core values. And it’s really ironic. We think in so many bullshit self-help offers tell us this, that we need to be like super motivated and inspired to get going.

But what all the latest scientific research says is actually the opposite. You need to get going to give yourself a chance to feel inspired or motivated. Don’t have to engage in positive thinking or self-talk, or get all hyped up. You just show up and act consistently in alignment with your core values.

And I argue that’s ultimately the key to building this kind of grounded foundation upon which you can strive. There are two ways to strive for that c-Class one is without this foundation and you get there and you might be pretty stoked for a day, maybe even a week, but then ultimately you feel empty.

 

It’s like what you said, crap. What’s the next thing. The other way is to strive by showing up day-to-day consistently acting on your core values and then the C class you enjoy it. It’s a nice thing to have, but it doesn’t leave you immediately seeking the next thing because you’ve built a steady foundation that day in and day out.

Cause that C-Class gets old and a little dirty. Researchers call this, the arrival fallacy in the arrival fallacy is just that. So many people myself at times included, this is all humans, we tell ourselves a story that will arrive when something magical happens. But the goalpost is always 10 yards down the field.

We never really arrived. We’ve got to learn how to be able to embrace the process of going for outcomes that we care about because it’s the process that makes up our days. It’s about also you could argue it’s shifting from an outcome oriented mindset to a process oriented mindset. And if you nail the process and you enjoy the process, the outcomes take care of themselves.

Whereas if you’re so fixated on these certain outcomes, it can cause you to become pretty anxious and restless.

And I think that’s exactly what I do, when, like whenever we do a deal, I personally find like one little stupid thing. I want to buy on Amazon or like a little reward to get me to that next goalpost.

I also do this with my teams. I’ll tell them like what’s the goal. What’s something that you guys want on Amazon again. Cause it’s easy. It’s like when we hit a goal, you’ll get that. But yeah, I guess what you’re telling me, that’s the wrong way of going about it, right? That’s the achievers.

Again, I want to be clear. It’s okay to Buy a nice watch, buy a nice car, whatever it is . This is not about not achieving or not chasing goals. I think what I am saying is it’s about not getting so fixated on those goals and instead, figuring out what can I do today to show up live alignment in my core values, how can I be present?

How can I be patient? How can I be vulnerable? How can I build community? How can I do these things that I know are going to be the solid foundation? That are there for me. And they keep me strong, regardless of what’s happening externally. This is the stuff where your portfolio absolutely crushes out of your mind performance

and this foundation provides you gravity so you don’t completely go off the rocker and make a mistake. Take a risk that’s unnecessary. The flip side is also we go through a recession portfolio tanks. There’s some kind of external event that you could never imagine. It’s this foundation that holds you up during those difficult times.

And again, the whole argument of the book is so much about the current culture tells us to only focus on the peak of the mountain or the slope. Again, this is the metaphor for our own lives and we neglect these foundational principles that are really the most important thing that support everything else.

What is another common value that you see in, what are maybe a few habits that you’ve stumbled upon that you see a lot of people? I think one that your listenership in particular Lane will resonate with is taking something that is very common in sound investors and applying it to all of your life, which is don’t go for like big heroic efforts.

Don’t try to hit home runs just consistently put the ball on in play. Small steps consistently taken over long periods of time, lead to big gains. In investing, this is the rule of compounding. But the rule of compounding is also true for developing relationships, for taking control of your health for better nutrition, for really any kind of daily practice.

Again, the current culture says. You should find a way to hack your way to greatness. There’s overnight success, take 19 different supplements and you’ll be Superman or superwoman and none of that’s true, of course. The real way to get long-term gains no different than investing is to be patient.

And take consistent small steps over time. It doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t adjust your strategy as you go, but if you try to swing for the fences, you often strike out. So it’s much better to just have small, consistent gains. That’s how you build a durable base. So that’s one key value of groundedness.

Another key value of groundedness is this notion of accepting where you are to get where you want to go. So often we don’t see clearly the current situation that we’re in. We put on our like rose tinted glasses and we tell ourselves a story that it’s better than it really is, or it’ll quickly change, or, a whole bunch of these kinds of stories that dilute ourselves from actually seeing reality for what it is.

And it feels good in the short term, but in the long-term it’s detrimental because if you’re not clear about what’s actually in front of you, then you can’t take wise action to impact. So there’s a practice in the book around self distancing, because so often we’re better at giving advice to our friends than ourselves.

For areas of our lives that we’re really struggling with the exercise is pretend that a close friend is in the exact same situation as you. What advice would you give that friend and then go do that thing so often. People give advice to a friend that’s very different than what they’re doing it’s so simple, but it’s hard.

The example of this is I’ve worked with some elite athletes and they hate being injured and I’ve coached elite athletes that are literally limping out the door with a sprain hamstring to go do their workout because they don’t want to miss it. And I say, Jim, if you saw a training partner, limping out the door to do a workout, what would you tell.

He’s like, I tell him just rest, take one or two more days off. So you don’t blow up your hamstring. And then it’s why are you limping out the door to do a workout? Like you need to follow that advice yourself. Acceptance seeing situations clearly, even when you necessarily , even when you don’t necessarily want it to is another key principle.

Community, we talked a little bit about this, but investing in relationships, realizing that if you are going to take this process view of life much of what makes a process fulfilling and enjoyable is the people that you’re along the ride with. And I think what happens too often with high achievers is we’ve become so focused on what’s out in front of us.

So focused on efficiency and optimization that it cannibalizes the time and energy that we need to build those close relationships. So it’s a little bit about reprioritizing, the role of community in our lives. Obviously COVID has made that challenging over the last year and a half. But I think we’re seeing even more so just how important it is because we’re realizing like, wow, it’s really tough to be isolated.

So those are just a few other examples. That community thing is a big importance and especially in investing. Lot of people , they listened to the podcast while they’re doing chores or just stay in their boxers on their computer.

These are the guys who go through this syndication e-course . But the whole point is you get to know a little bit baseline so that if you do happen to find other accredited investors, you can build those relationships. And that’s the community aspect of it.

And we do a lot better in communities too.

We like to think and tell ourselves a story that we’re the center of the universe, but we’re actually not. We’re just a little speck and the people with whom we surround ourselves have an enormous impact on us. So the best way to be a really thoughtful, patient, consistent investor is to surround yourself with really patient thoughtful, consistent investors.

The best way to become a great athlete is to surround yourself with other great athletes. The best way to become a loving patient parent is to develop relationships with other loving patient parents. And again, I think what happens in our like outward focused optimization hustle culture. Because we spend so much time pushing forward for these things out in front of us, that we neglect the time and energy to build those communities.

Going back to the whole community thing your network is your net worth is what we always say. I still have free onboarding calls if you guys want to get signed up for that fees to go to the website I think it’s simplepassivecashflow.com/contact but we asked you guys to join the club first, do your pre-work first before booking that call with me.

Some strange people that they’d like to do everything by themselves. They’re most of them are introverts office, but these are the guys like investing in notes and private money lending and there they stay to themselves. To them, they think 10 31 exchanges is a good idea.

Their strategy is just whack, right? And there’s a huge difference between those people like that and people who get all these other investment constants that we get, the biggest difference is like those people don’t interact and play nice with others, from somebody who sees a whole bunch of different people, the successful people and the people, they might have a semi high net worth, but they’re just doing it the wrong way.

They’re driving around with a handbrake on. It’s the ability to who you know, and collecting the best practices from your network so just another plug for community there. But Brad, your kind of mindset I like I really personify with the stoicism type of mindset.

For those you guys not aware of that. I’ll let you define that for us.

Yeah. So the Stoics, it’s a group of thought that came out of the ancient Roman empire. And it is very much one of trying to cultivate equanimity. So inability to absorb life’s highs and lows and counter to common belief.

Stoicism is not about not feeling emotion or not showing emotion. I think a lot of people are very misconstrued and confused about that. Cause we hear oh, you’re so stoic. You don’t show emotion. Now the Stoics had tons of emotion, but what they realized is that the human life is going to contain all kinds of highs and all kinds of lows.

And if you’re going to have skin in the game and you’re going to care deeply about pursuits. Eventually those pursuits are going to break your heart cause they don’t always go your way. And what stoicism teaches is that you take the highs and you smile and then you kiss them goodbye and you take the lows and you let them hurt you.

And then you kiss them goodbye because everything’s impermanent. There’s this quote at the start of the book from a stoic philosopher Epictetus that said people complain that their hands and feet are hurting in callous. Of course your hands and feet are hurting if you’re going to live a life and you’re going to use your hands and feet, then your hands and feet will become hurting in callous.

The point being that there is no free lunch. And if you want to have skin in the game and you want to put yourself out there, it is going to be distressing at times. And we have to accept that. And if we refuse to accept that, what ends up happening is we don’t take risks. Our lives become smaller, not larger, or we dilute ourselves and we’d pretend that none of that bad stuff’s going to happen.

And when it does, we get totally surprised and completely blown apart.

Another stoic lesson that I like is the obstacles the way, when things are getting tough, that should be a good sign for you that usually makes most of the other competition give up. And when you get past that obstacle, things are going to be much better for you doing the lower competition.

Look, I talk about being at the point of discomfort. So growth comes from being a little bit uncomfortable. If you’re always comfortable, you’re probably not growing. This is true in any domain of life. So it’s really important to identify what areas of my life do I want to grow in. It could be anything from lifting weights, becoming a better investor, being in more intimate relationships.

Learning more about NASCAR, you name it. And if you’re completely comfortable in those areas of your life, then you’re not setting yourself up for growth. Now this isn’t about jumping off the deep end that just leads to anxiety. That’s no fun. It’s about finding just manageable challenge is what I call them in the book.

Things that are adversely slightly outside your comfort zone, and then going and pursuing those things. Again, you don’t want to do this in all areas of your life at the same time, either because that can be overwhelming. But for those select areas that you do want to grow in, it’s so helpful to make yourself a little bit uncomfortable.

I see this play out and I see people get a lot of success with this especially like most of our listeners are introverts. They don’t really get it. They’re a little scared of people. They come out to the Hawaii meetup and the retreat and they meet their tribe.

More introverted people that are interested in these types of financial topics and their financial fat fanatics. But yeah, I think a lot of you guys, I don’t want to pigeon hole the audience, but I think a lot of you guys out there do subscribe to the stoic philosophy and I think it’s your jam.

I do think there’s a lot of misconception around introvert too Lane. I think that introverts and I’m an introvert. We get this wrap is being like very much wanting to be isolated and left alone. And what the research shows is that’s not the case at all. What introverts generally want is really deep connection in focus and conversation.

If you go to a huge party, which most introverts don’t like doing, it’s hard to have that, especially if it’s a deep party where you don’t know anyone. You’re not going to get that one-on-one intimacy or finding your tribe. Whereas most introverts thrive in small groups of like-minded people. So it’s not that

I’m either in or out it’s do I thrive walking into a room with all kinds of people or do I want to be a little bit more deliberate and intentional about how I build that community? So for introverts is kind of like, you know, you’re getting out of your comfort zone and when you feel that typically is a good sign, And so the other two that I wanted to briefly go over Brad, if you could help us explain you also follow the ancient wisdom of Buddhism and a Taoism what are the kind of like the two big takeaways from those two, for those people who aren’t super familiar.

Yeah. So like stoicism, a huge takeaway from Buddhism is this notion of impermanence, which is the everything changes. As an investor, it’s really important to remember that because it prevents you from clinging to the highs and then being really disappointed when they’re no longer high or getting so caught up in the lows that you become despairing and depressed.

So you could sum up Buddhism. In two words are the teachings of Buddhism, which is everything changes. And. I actually think that’s really empowering because what it means is that the future is not yet determined. And if we can build again, the strong foundation of grounded-ness to support everything else that we do in our life, the stuff that comes and goes and changes will be able to hold all of that.

See it clearly, and then take wise action as a result. And Taoism is very much about paying close attention to what is going on around you. Ancient houses and they called it the way and the way is the flow of the universe. And what Taoism teaches is that we are always operating in harmony with what’s around us at the highest level.

Alluded to this earlier, you never really go at it alone and paying attention to what’s happening around you is so important for yourself. And I think all of these ancient wisdom traditions, they really point toward the value of I’m going to sound like a broken record, but accepting and seeing things clearly so that you can take wise action being really present

that’s a part of seeing things, clearly paying close attention. Patience which is letting things unfold on their own time. Taking small steps for big gains, realizing the consistency compounds, not trying to always hit home runs, but being really deliberate and just walking a long path, having a long view and vulnerability, which is about putting your skin in the game it’s really easy to fake it and be too cool to care.

And I believe that’s a protective mechanism because you’re scared to actually try something because if you try something you could fail and you have to be okay with that.

Other than picking up your book, the practice of groundedness on Amazon. Brad Stulberg , B R A D S T U L B E R G, any other last parting thoughts?

I really appreciate you having me. If you all liked what I had to say I’d be honored if you read the book. I tried to write it in a way. I guess this will be my last thought. I wanted to close the knowing doing gap in this book

so many books are all about knowing. So they help you understand the topic.

Which is great, but they miss the doing part. Which is okay, now that I understand these principles, now that I understand this philosophy, now that I can express this mindset, how do I actually show up day in and day out and implement it.

In every single page of this book I checked against the criteria of, will this be valuable for someone to actually do something in their life that is productive and different as a result.

And I think that for anything that you read, whether it’s my book or something else. I would really push yourself to realize it’s one thing to know and be able to talk about something. It’s another thing to do it and practice it, which is why the title is not just groundedness. It’s the practice of grounded.

Yeah, thanks for thanks for doing that because that’s, it drives me crazy. And why don’t I try not to read too many books? Cause like they like tell me all these stupid scientific studies, like what’s the one, the power of habit. That was a horrible book. It just told me all these stupid like scientific studies and nothing like nothing practical that I could implement.

It just wasted my time. I hope that if you guys read my book, it’ll be a very different experience because I tried to write like the kind of anti at that book. I want every single page to be hey, here are concrete practices that you can implement in your daily life that will make you more grounded.

And I think that’s maybe that’s a type a and me like everything. I do everything I spend my time on. It should create some kind of habit change or actionable item if it isn’t, it’s just wasting your time. Yeah. But I need to be more grounded. Shut out a little bit too. You’ll read the book and hopefully your whole community does too.

I appreciate you having me on the show today.

Thanks, Brad. Again, the practice of groundedness and get out of your comfort zone guys. Join our community simple, passive cashflow.com/club. I don’t know why you haven’t signed up yet and reach out to me.Book your onboarding call.

I won’t fight. I’m a real person. So many people have been listening for two to three years. And it just finally now picking up the zoom call and talking to me. Those are your action items. Pick up practice of groundedness, read practice in pick up the phone and call Lane, or schedule your onboarding call. I won’t yell at you guys.

I promise. All right lane. Thanks for having me on. Thanks everyone for listening. And if you pick up the book, I appreciate it. Take care of everyone.

 

Best Way to Define Infinite Banking

https://youtu.be/AHAdPH_UzIA

I best define infinite banking is it’s really our process. In creating private vault for you to use as your bank. And overall it’s a process, the vehicle that it uses his whole life insurance and its dividend paying whole life insurance is the product of choice on that. I specifically like from our multiple reasons that we’ll go over, but that policy then is you overfund it.

And in that way, it has a cash value that you can access your cash at any time via policy. That’s the overall concept. And as you pull that out, the money still continues to work in your vault or in that, in your account. And you’re able to deploy that elsewhere and pretty much have your money work in two places at once.

The way I personally use it, when I had a policy, when I first started to do $50,000 a year after a couple of years, two, three years, they had at least a hundred thousand dollars of cash value built up in there. I always try and keep my liquidity low in my bank. You never want to have too much cash making nothing, but that’s why the next money is in your infinite banking policy to cash value, where it’s making a nice little tax-free yield.

That the first component of why we like infinite banking so much when the money is in, I call this the government in pull, but it’s just for some strange reason. Yeah. Life insurance, your yields, there are tax free. That’s a place to store my liquidity. And then when I need to go into a dealer too, and I need to drain that liquidity, I have it, but at least it’s not sitting in my normal checking account savings account, not doing any teeth growth, the use of whole life insurance.

It has a guaranteed aspect of it. Current gross rate of that is, 4% that is about to change, but the policies are ranging from three, three, 3% to three and a half percent uncorrelated not tied to the stock market directly on some policies you may have. And you can be in control of that, of how much funds are correlated.

But one of the main benefits for investors that this is not correlated to the stock market protection, but it is a product. So there is a life death benefit portion of it. But in addition to that in states, it varies, but there’s also some liability. And bankruptcy protection with the cash value or the death benefit over policies.

Some of our doctor clients, what they like to do is they stuff a lot of cash in here mainly for this protection aspect, right? There’s all these different asset protection strategies out there. There’s not one that’s going to get you to trying to build your castle with multiple layers of protection and diversifying.

So by putting some money into life insurance policies, Think that one part of your portfolio. Yeah. And liquidity, that’s one of the main appeals for investors where your funds are not tied up. You have access to that and it, you would have access to it in the forms of policy loans. And that’s what keeps it also, tax-free where you have access to the growth and all of your policy.

Don’t Let Your Money Burn

https://youtu.be/FMUdj4snpGc

Now some investors, they have a huge glut of lazy equity, maybe even half a million or $2 million of lazy equity that they haven’t done. Like I said, I’ve seen investors invest a million dollars in the first year with me, but I think that’s an outlier. Right. I suggest people try things out slowly, hang up for a year.

Make sure we’re competent. And I know we’re competent. We’ve done a lot of deals thus far. I’m just being empathetic to new people coming in because that’s the prudent thing. That’s the thing I would do. I don’t recommend anything that I don’t wouldn’t do at the same time. You got money burning a hole in your head.

And for every billion dollars of Lacy liquidity, you have, you could just stick that into something at 10%, pretty easy. It’s such as HP. I wouldn’t suggest putting all that money in one place or all that money in a private equity deal, but you want to deploy the funds, but you want to do it prudently a nice way of doing this is putting a chunk in private equity to just get it working because the idea is you’re going to get that much.

A lot of the, these deals, they make us put a lot of this money is reserves. So once we hit certain milestones, but we refinance the money out, return a lot of that initial nonprofit equity capital to investors right off the bat. And maybe originally went in with a hundred grand off of equity. Maybe you’re only sitting with 50 grand on a year’s time.

Every year, every deal is different. And I don’t want to set any precedents. But the pref equity is a shorter term lifespan. You’re sticking money in there. You got to think that you’re getting a heck of a lot faster than most people on the traditional equity side. So it can be a strategy thing. The way of thinking about it is you’re putting loading money in, but you’re leapfrogging it too.

Maybe one to three years into the future that, you know, you’re going to get it back, but then you go to redeploy into more of a traditional equity, eight to Sarah. I do this a lot of times. It’s kind of like a short term, one to three years, E in a way that you want to get your money in traditional equity, but you’re waiting for the deals that come around, which, and they’re even frequent.

And if you’re starting out, you may not have good deal flow. You’d likely though, right? So you want to be patient, but you still want to get your money working. And that’s what the private equity option.

Which is BETTER: Pref Equity OR Traditional Equity?

https://youtu.be/1JMzY_7b0XA

Another investor asked me one time. What do you think I should do? I’m torn between the two. They both sound right. Well, I asked them the question like, Hey man, how’s your job? Do you think you’re going to get fired any time soon? The company downsize? The reason I asked that as well. If there, if you’re a government worker or you have a pretty steady W2 job that arrived, if you’ve got your emergency savings account, few months of expenses, the kind of tie you over to find your next job, where you have opportunities to harvest some cash money from a Roth IRA.

Cash savings or he locked. You’re good. Put it in traditional equity, especially if you’re under a million or two network, you need to grow your money. Pref equity, 10, 11%, a great return. Personally, I think you can grow it better in a traditional equity. That’s what you should be doing. If you’re not to two to $3 million and above, you’ve got to grow your money.

You’ve got to use it now. You got to score more points. You’ve got to put up more points on the board. If not, you’re not going to win the game. And the flip side of that is say in an investor said, I worked for oil and gas industry. Things are weird or. I’m on a contract work this year. I don’t know what’s going to happen in six months.

Then I would say you should do the private equity at the stage of the game. Get your money working, get the cashflow. That might be a better way for that particular person to go. But again, it’s different for every situation. Every person has different. Ideally you’re segregating your portfolios. You see me?

See my portfolio. Sometimes I take more. Most of my portfolio is pretty conservative. Mostly stabilized cashflow. .

What Type of Company to Choose [Infinite Banking FAQ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48JCThIKbJE

Tyler, what type of company do we choose?

I was speaking earlier about the different types of product. In regards to the company, the importance of the company is you would want to focus and look at a mutual insurance company versus a stock insurance company. A mutual insurance companies are where the policy holders are basically the owners of the company.  Whereas the stock insurance there’s actual stock, and  shareholders are the ownership of the company. So there’s a conflict of interest there. There are basically four large performing mutual insurance companies where they have a proven track record on actual payouts not just illustrations and those for New York Life, Northwestern, Mass Mutual and Guardian are the top four companies when looking for that.

Again, it’s not only the company itself and each company has maybe its own different quirks and pros and cons. I don’t want people to get so caught up on the actual company because it’s the product. The process is also much more important than just the company itself. Policies within the same company or products within the same company if they’re not designed correctly will not serve your purpose. Might not be beneficial for you.

So the mutual insurance companies are those four that you mentioned?

Yeah.

Is there like a website we can go to? Where it’s like they are rated.

I think you could just go, you could Google top rated insurance companies, mutual insurance companies. A lot of times it’ll be a blend of the stock insurance and mutual insurance. It’s how they rate the companies could be different and even though at the top four a lot of them have their quirks. Some have flexibility in the sense of funding period allows a lot of flexibility there. Others have funding each within the year. You’re flexible. Some of the loans are handled differently between the companies. Some of them have different online portal so it’s not just the product itself. There’s some of those soft things that maybe make a company stand out for you personally.

And so the mutual insurance company is the ones that we’re used to. And I think some people will say, oh, they found this other company that has less requirements on the health screening and stuff like that. Those are like your lower level ones.

Very worried about a insurance company that doesn’t have a stringent underwriting process because it has a policy holder for a mutual insurance company. You are the owners of that, you want the insurance company to do well because you receive that back in dividends. And there may be some smaller insurance companies willing to forgo, maybe under medical underwriting, take  a little bit more risky clients on. But that may hurt in the long run as far as the policies overall.

If you guys have questions on this particular question, type it into the chat.

Importance of Policy Design [Infinite Banking FAQ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYF5AaASUgk

Importance of policy design.

Touched about it earlier. As mentioned within the company, there are different products. There are limitations. The first one is an IRS limitation. Again, it’s still an insurance product. It has to be considered an insurance product in order for it to maintain its benefits.

You’ll hear it and if you exceed that it will become a modified endowment contract and it’ll lose those tax benefits. That’s something I mentioned earlier about MEC or the MEC. Then how you design the specific product, I think  for IBC or at least for a lot of the investors there, the main goal is to have the maximum cash value.

The death benefit is a feature of the product and it does help with generational wealth and legacy planning as well. But as far as the main design efforts, you’re designing it for maximum cash value. And the death benefit is a secondary benefit from that. Versus traditionally, when you design insurance products, you’re looking at what kind of death, the maximum death benefit you can get for the smallest amount of premium. IBC turns that upside down and says,  “how much funding do you want to put in for maximum cash value growth?”  and the death benefit is a requirement needed in order to maintain those taxable or the favorable tax requirement.

And so it is very counterintuitive and this is why Dave Ramsey says that whole life is a scam. He doesn’t know the legal way differently. And then the other lever that you can play around with is you can make a policy where you get big, higher interest rates. If you’re doing like an IUL policy comes in order for her to be able to talk about today. That’s when you start to skew the policy more for higher returns, the stock market. But when you do that, then you give up what the whole point we’re doing that for, which is to maximize the cash value to invest in deals and stuff like that.

Yeah! One more part. I did add down there with flexibility especially with investors and maybe non steady income, the flexibility becomes a huge aspect as far as what you need to fund annually in order to keep the policy enforced. You want me to have some flexibility in that year to year to help you withstand maybe some of the unknowns or the maybe large capital events that happened if we’re investing in syndications, for example.

The Two Main Policy Limits IRS/MEC Limit [Infinite Banking FAQ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L9LH9t1_WE

Next question here, the two main policy Clements. Maybe define the MEC, what is MEC?

The MEC limit is really something that came out in the eighties from the IRS. That prior to the eighties, before the 7702 rule, you’ll hear that also is that there was no limit as far as the amount of funds you could put into a policy. The IRS put a cap on it and it’s really just a calculation based on the person’s age, gender, and death benefit. And it’s a ratio basically how much death benefit is needed. For that policy amount and it’s a seven year. And so they’re saying over that seven years, this is how much, the maximum amount that one can put into a policy with this death benefit and still be called and be considered a insurance policy versus prior to that law, someone could just put in a dollar premium and then put a $20,000 of paid up additions or the cash value part of that, and still be considered insurance. IRS put a limit on that. So that’s the big IRS limit that we do not want to mess around with in that sense. And it is a seven year lock so that’s where it may be called a seven pay lock or a MEC limit. Those are all basically the same.

Yeah so I’ll explain it a little bit different. I don’t know if this is the true story. All these politicians are making these laws to find ways not to pay taxes and they created this life insurance, but then they start to stuck all their money away. It’s like insurance policies, but that’s where the equipment strengths of this stuff at the whole thing.

The second limit and this is company derived. It’s the paid up additions limit so you have that the MEC limit and then what you hear is the paid-up additions limit. Two main companies we use, those limitations usually is one company is 10 times base. So if for base premium say at $10,000, you could put up to 10 times that in paid up additions  which is basically a cash dump. So you could put in $10,000 of base premium PUA, you could put in another a hundred thousand and PUAs  and that’s the company limit. Another company we use a lot it’s the 10-90. It’s 10%. It’s not really 10 times so it’s the 10-90 split is the max. If you have $10,000 of a base premium, you can put in up to 90,000 in PUAs. So it’s slightly less, but again, those are policy or insurance company limits. And then there is some flexibility. And that’s what you mentioned or Nash mentioned earlier that we’re just testing that out because essentially if you have a longer funded period that you’re able to maybe put in a little bit more and the companies have allowed you to do. Granted, you’re still locked into the target amount.

For Nash’s example, 116,000 for 10 years, that’s 1.116 mil total of funds who wants to put into the policy. If he puts in 150,000 year one, which is under the MEC limit, he’s not going to be able to continue to do that for all 10 years. So the maximum would still be 1.116 mil. So in those later years, he’ll be putting in less why he’s doing that would be because you want to front load the policy, have the compounded dividends start earnings earlier and it’ll have a greater effect down the road. So that’s one of the benefits to it.

The Two Policy Limits: EPP vs. PUA [Infinite Banking FAQ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=–yDzBkzT5s

We had a question here, follow up question. This doesn’t apply with EPP. Maybe define what that is too.
I think every company cause has different names for PUAs. So I’m mainly familiar with guardian and mass mutual, they call it unscheduled and scheduled PUAs. That guardian mass mutual has ELAR additional life insurance rider or Lisser life insurance supplemental rider.

Matt, can you explain the EPP PUA? Is that like a scheduled PUA? 

It was my question but  from what I understand a PUA is that it was with Penn mutual, but they’re saying like what the EPP PUA, you said like their traditional would be seven or eight years pay then after that you stopped that.

But what the EPP PUA, you’re able to keep the max fund or a longer amount of time. Let’s just say, you put with an EPP PUA where you do a maximum of a hundred thousand and after that seven year, eight year limit, you can’t do the maximum anymore. You can only do a certain amount of that. But with EPP you can set up for a longer period of say, 20, 30 years, if you wanted to.

To me, it just seems simple. if you plan on using this as a bank account for the long run anyway, for investment purposes, that would make sense just because you already have a policy open, you can just keep funding it for the rest of your investing years.

Got it! I would say mass mutual is something similar in the sense that their funding period is flexible, where you can go lock, 20, 30 years flexible.

I think it’s just different. They call it different things. I would have to look specific at that and I have some pen-pal I’ll go look at the true definition and probably reach out specifically without, or send it out to the group.

I think, as Tyler said, like all these companies have little nuances, right? Like I got a Penn and I’m aware of this,  like you say, you can keep paying it for awhile after your initial period of six or 10 years, whatever you set it up based on your situation. But the downside that they have is that you got to keep putting to it every year where like a guardian, they don’t have that long-term flexibility. But you can choose not to pay the rider one year and take a break. It’s different. I think this is where you have to look at multiple policies and figure out based on your situation. Some people in the group are business owners, right? Business owners have a lot of variability in income. Whereas if you’re just a straight up salary guy, you may want that more. Their cashflow is very stable. Therefore you’re not going to have these big fluctuations so you would rather do that arrangement where you don’t have that flexibility, but you have that long-term flexibility in that respect and policy is changed too. 

When I was choosing between, or when I was building my policy, I looked at both or I spoke to the agent about doing both an EPP and EPP PUA. Both of them, you have to make the payment so that the premium don’t lapse the contract. They both had the same catch-all provision where you have one year, where if you don’t make your fee, you can fill it up the next year too. If you were to not do it, then you would lose it. In terms of losing that rider and had to average a certain amount over any three year rolling period. It’s not really where you can have if you were to miss it one or not. It’s an average over three years, but I opted with the EPP PUA  because my funding, I could max out my PUAs for 62 years. So I started when I was 34, I can put in 120 K every year until I’m like, a hundred. And what I was told was the ROI is 0.1% about 0.1% less, but that  will essentially make up for it in some flexibility of making the payments and being able to do it for longer. A sacrifice for a little bit of return for more flexibility and being able to max stuff more.

Yeah.  I think I might’ve talked to the agent about the same thing and he pretty much said that if it came down to it and you really wanted to stop paying, you can say after the eight year mark or whatever, just say “This is paid up now and I’m not going to make any more additions to it”. Obviously, then you can’t add anymore, but that’s where the flexibility is.

And I think, truly, it’s the policy design, because the flexibility means different things or has different values. Someone wants to have flexibility of the different amount of being able to put in different amounts throughout the year, or they want to be able to put it in for a long time. Those are the main two different flexibilities. And I think there’s multiple companies. Each company has its different benefits based on their policy limits. Just keep in mind that for that long funding period, I think as Lane mentioned it and Matt also it’s yeah, three years. I think they do a look back three years on that average. So say maybe you, you had the ability to fund it a hundred thousand if over that three years, that average you only funded it to 30,000. From that point forward,  the max you can fund, it would only be up to that 30,000. It drops down. Just be aware of that. Now I get it, I don’t think there’s one pro or con there there’s one better than the other. It’s really what your goals are and what you want to achieve that. 

The good thing all you guys have set up and it gets always constant. It’s always there. I don’t know. Personally, I always like to move stuff around every so often. It’s the more radic so that kind of just fits my style.

I don’t want to speak bad about any other companies. I would say there is a company where you’re able to not have that three year look back and still have a pretty long funding flexibility, and maybe not 60 years that 20 or 30 year mark, where that’s a pretty good funding period for the purposes of this.

My question directed to what we were talking about was, you were talking about being able to stuff a little bit more. You have those new fixed funding periods and I think in that other scenario where you have the long funding period, that the same thing doesn’t apply. You’re already at the max. You’re hitting the max every time.

Got it!

I think some people, they just don’t want to get a another health screening cause they’re freaked out about not passing or something like that or they just don’t like health screenings so I could see why some people don’t. We just want to set it, forget it.

Or if you’re going to plan on getting out of the policy, you would have to pay expenses all over again.

Impact of 7702 Rule IRC [Infinite Banking FAQ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA8Iv8zJON4

Next question impact of the 7702 rule IRC.

This is the IRC change rule that just came out in December of last year. It goes into effect. Now, basically the insurance companies, they were mandated to provide a guaranteed gross 4% rate that will no longer apply for products in the future. The companies will be able to choose anywhere between two or 3.75% so it allows some flexibility for the insurance companies. Now, again, this is the guaranteed rate, and this does not talk about the dividend rate. So dividend rates for all insurance companies are that above and beyond the guaranteed all strong insurance companies have been paying dividends over the past 140, 150 plus years.

So no insurance company has really been operating in the guaranteed environment but the true impact may not really be seen. But the insurance company is now no longer needed to provide that 4% guarantee. The true impact is also still hazy for most of the insurance, the whole life products have not come out with their new product yet so this is a relatively big change. The insurance companies are figuring out what to do with it. What may happen and what people are starting to see is that it made decrease the cost of insurance premiums may go down and this could also increase the MEC limits which may seem good. But again, for our purposes, we’re trying to stuff in, I think, desired amount of funding if the MEC limit increases.

So that means that I can buy more death benefit with less premium when we’re qualifying for insurance, that there is that income limitation. So it’s not, if I only make a hundred thousand a year, I can ask for a $15 million death benefit that there is some qualification, as far as income with a higher MEC limit or lower premiums, someone making a hundred thousand. Typically when you’re in your thirties, you can have a death benefit 30 times that when you’re in your forties and fifties, that drops down to twenties. And when you’re older, that drops down to 10 times. For an older person, you can only get 10 times your annual income. So if I’m making a hundred thousand, the death benefit I can get is only a million now.

And because your premiums are lower, you can’t stuff in much money. So it may seem like it’s a good thing. It may limit how much funds one could put in if they’re on that threshold. But it also may not have impact to most people, that it may just have a smaller impact than what people are anticipating.

Companies do need to have a product out by the end of this calendar year. And usually when a big change like this happens, anyone who recently got a policy and it may be looking back as far as having one issued in 2021, you’ll have the choice of shifting over to the new product if you want to.

There probably be also a grace period as far as when new products come out. There’ll be maybe a month or two, where if someone applies. Yeah. In that time period, there’ll be able to choose the old product or the new product. At this point, a lot of the four major, or even with mixed plan into that, no one has come out with any product as of today.

And we’re looking at probably the end of August for the first ones to start coming out with that.

Typically these newer products aren’t as good as them?

Yeah. Typically you may add some flexibility. So for example, the P wave limitations, those are things that have dramatically got more stringent over the years, purely because insurance companies are recognizing that they’re not making a lot off of it. That’s just a cash dump. So they’ve started to limit those rather drastically. And as Lane mentioned, usually newer products are not as favorable as the older products.

Best time to invest as yesterday. It’s time to make an IBC was yesterday. My guess is like the rates are lower today. Overall people are starving for yields. That’s just my quick guess lie that grades are drop.

This helps definitely the insurance companies and so again, with a mutual insurance company that gets transferred back to you in the form of dividends. It’s not all bad. There’s bullies coming out, bank owned, life insurance products. Those have come out already on the new law and people are not seeing as much impact as what they thought it was going to be. It’s pretty much in line.

Part of that has to do with a guaranteed is just a guaranteed rate but that’s not the dividend. Maybe you can talk through when people are looking at big paper, like they’re looking at the guaranteed rate and there’s actually rate that is  paid.

The guarantee is I guess the worst case scenario and like the company declares no dividend typical dividends of the insurance companies right now range between five and a half to 6%. That’s not four plus five. That’s just the difference. So like one and a half to 2% over the guarantee is the dividend. What the companies are providing above the 4% as mentioned earlier, no company has been operating in the guaranteed or only  providing zero dividends since existence. And you’ve always been paying out dividends through all the, the down cycles. We did not anticipate a company saying they’re not going to be providing any dividends. So even if a company claim their guaranteed rate drops to 2%, it’s not saying that their dividend rate will drop by that amount also Dividends will probably remain pretty close to the same.

Explain this to me, some people, they show me their policy and then it’s like a high rate, but then I look at this company is like some random, like no documented medical screening company. There can be like a bait and switch right on that rate that they show on the paper.

When a company says 6% is their dividend rate and another company says 6% as a dividend rate. The actual pay out or the actual return may be different, even though the stated dividend rates are the same. The reason for that is because these are gross rates what’s embedded in, it is company expenses, mortality costs, commissions, and each company handles that differently.

And that’s really the proprietary black box that even as an agent or broker, we don’t really have privy to that. Those costs vary even though illustration may show a strong return. That’s why those four mutual companies are what we heavily use, because those have actual performance. The actual payouts have been more in line with the illustrations versus just illustration that may look good and the actual performance may not be the same.