Blogs

August 2022 Monthly Market Update

Welcome everybody. This is the monthly market update. Here we go. What’s up everybody? It is August, 2022. Let’s get the monthly market update. If you haven’t checked out the podcast, simple passive cash flow is where you find it. ITunes, Google play Spotify. And check this out on YouTube. And we also record and put all these monthly market updates on the website and simple passive cash flow.com/investor letter every month for you guys to pull these reports and see if I’m lying or see if I’m right in my predictions.

But if you guys want to ask any questions throughout or leave any comments, feel free to type it into the chat box below from your perspective, the way you’re watching it. We go out, live on YouTube and our groups, looks like we got a wandering dot what’s up, man. And we also put this in the podcast form.

So let’s get started here. First article, there’s another one of wallet, hubs, top 10 places, and this is the best and worst places to rent in America. The best place was Maryland. Overland Park, Kansas Sioux city falls, South Dakota, Bismark Lincoln Chandler, Arizona Scotta Arizona, Gilbert, Arizona, El Paso, Texas, Casper, Wyoming, Cedar falls, Illinois and Fargo North Dakota.

How I, they came up with those top rental markets or best places to rent, I guess this is in the perspective of a renter. I have no idea, but you guys seem to like these top 10, which is why we do ’em. The markets with the best vacancy rates are the little rock Arkansas, Casper, Wyoming, Augusta, Georgia, Armillo, Texas.

And. Charleston Wyoming. Affordable rents are in Wyoming at Bismark, North Dakota, Cedar walls, Cedar rapids, Illinois, Sioux city falls, Sioux falls, South Dakota, Overland park, Kansas. Moving on. If you guys haven’t heard of it, it’s like the second crypto Wil winter, and this one’s a little bit different.

So what a lot of people were doing was putting their money into these crypto staking platforms, such as block fives or CELs, I wasn’t doing very many of these nor do I do. I don’t really do crypto. I don’t really believe in it. I believe in the whole idea of cryptocurrencies, getting away from governments controlling currency, which I’m all for, but I just don’t really I don’t know.

I think real estate’s just way better and it’s passive income, which you can typically defer the taxes on as opposed to this stuff, which the governments are gonna be coming after. Pretty heavily on, A little bit less because it all took a crap on everybody. And especially like that Luna thing, which I knew was a bad deal from the start.

But if you haven’t heard, Celsis is one of these big trading platforms where people would. They would state their coins or whatever it’s called. And they would get maybe like 9%, 15% on just staking it. But what people didn’t realize, what the heck that meant and what it meant is like putting your coin up and then, people borrowing it or you’re putting money up for the barring platform to happen.

And. It was, it’s like a house of cards is how I saw it. And eventually came down crumbling and Celia has had to restructure and a lot of people are asking you, Hey, am I gonna get my money back? And. I tell people, no, man, you’re not gonna get your money back because that’s why you don’t invest in this stuff.

Because in any investment you always ask how I am securitized? If shit happens, how am I gonna get some or all of my money back? And in these types of situations, you don’t because there’s no underlying asset value. There’s another deal going out, out there where people are like, you’re investing in like online businesses, but the online business is, there’s not really worth anything. If anything, there’s maybe some inventory, some useless junk that’s in a warehouse somewhere that you can sell pennies on for a dollar. But that’s why I like real estate because it’s always worth something, especially like the raw land portion of it.

Sorry. If you did this type of stuff I guess I should have told you, you should have done it. But, I don’t do this type of stuff. I maybe had $1,500 in blockFI that I took out last month just to learn it. But, I don’t put a substantial amount of my net worth, if you follow what the high net worth people over $10 million, do they typically don’t put anywhere.

They put one to 10% of their net worth into things like this. It’s all the lower net worth people that are dancing around with 10, 20% plus other net worth real estate, intelligent marketing reports that study finds that the US needs 4.3 million more apartments by the year 2035. And I put this in there and I think a lot of us are very well aware of which is why we invested in real estate, especially lower middle class workforce style housing.

Is because there’s a demand for it. It’s a commodity. And it’s something that you could forecast the need for, the reports that the US has tremendously difficult conditions that have fundamentally altered our nation’s demographics. But one thing remains certain. There is a need for more rental housing.

The US must build 3.7 million new apartments just to meet the future demand. On top of the 600,000 unit deficit and a loss of 4.7 million affordable apartment homes, a major driver of the apartment demand is immigration, which, you know if anything, immigration needs to occur more, especially if there’s a supply chain crunch in China, which isn’t supplying us with cheap labor.

We’ve gotta read. Domic a lot of these jobs, but anyway, that’s just my interject right there. The article ends and says California, Florida and Texas will require 1.5 million new apartments in 2035 accounting for 40% of the future demand,

Commercial property executive. Reports that why C R E, which is commercial real estate investors are rethinking refinancing. And I actually had a webinar for my investors a couple days ago. And, if you wanna get a copy, shoot us an email and team@simplepassivecashflow.com, where I went into some pretty heavy detail, but from a high level, just for the podcast audience and public investor.

Audience here, basically what’s happening is it’s really hard to get lending because the not, the interest rates went up, but I would probably argue that the thing to point to is like these rate caps that we normally will buy, usually buy something where. If we close that 5% interest rate, we wanna buy a cap.

So we don’t have to if the interest rates go up to five and a half, we cap out there. So it’s a way of being conservative, but it can be very expensive in the past. It’s cost us maybe half a percent or percent of the loan value to pay for one of these things. And now. I would say like triple or even more expensive than it once was, which really impacts closing costs and the deals.

So that’s just speaking from my own personal experience, but reading what the article is saying here during the first quarter, investors were eager to refinance in order to take advantage of high evaluations to get into the market. Now, many are hesitant to tap the debt markets because interest rates have risen so much since March and the lender underwriting is reflecting economic uncertainty and increased risk.

So we all know interest rates are gonna be going up to team inflation and you did the whole little diagram and chalkboard exercise on this whole dynamic alone. And another thing I would recommend for you guys is go back to the podcast. I did a couple great podcasts with Richard Duncan. You guys can check that out at simplepassivecashflow.com/duncan.

Get, multi-housing news reports, the growing cost of capital for multi-family development. This kind of piggybacking on, I just mentioned borrowing costs are 2% to two and a half percent higher than a year ago. The result is a situation not seen in years in which the caps have fallen, being below the cost of debt. But in fast growing Sunbelt hotspots, huge population growth has created demand for multifamily housing.

Far out shipping, supply, propelling, rent rates, and leaving many long time. Multifamily experts, slack jobs. The situation should keep cap rates slow. So in other words, rents are continually going up and up, which actually makes this a very good time to be buying real estate. This is a buyer’s market in a little bubble.

As the large institutional investors have paused they’re buying, but they gotta come back in. At some point I argued before the end of the. The only problem right now is in getting your lending set up or what we call capital markets, which has nothing to do with the cap rates. Guys, don’t get that confused.

So if you are an all cash buyer right now, this is an awesome time for you. Just, that’s just never a good way to invest. In my opinion, you always wanna be taking advantage of getting as much good debt as possible. The article ends with greater concern. Maybe whether the Fed will aggressively shrink its balance sheet yanking, a lot of liquidity out system, less cash will be available at any price available capital with insufficient funds to fund all development projects that are just talking about like a doom stage scenario.

Go back and check out that video we did, especially for you investors in our group. It is simple. And I think it, what it does is there’s a lot of noise out there. Like I mentioned, don’t watch these YouTube videos, these doin GLS of these guys who sell newsletters or the people trying to sell code, have them, you buy through their affiliate links and stuff like that, then get back to basics, and this is my book here. If you guys haven’t checked it out, Really trying to get over a hundred reviews. I think we’re up into the eighties or nineties right now. The journey of simple passive cash flow. I’ve been told it does a very good job in teaching the basics. And the basics is number one, investing in good deals, where you’re investing with people with reputation and a track record to get passive losses.

So you’re able to play different games on your taxes, essentially stop doing the stuff that your lame CPA is telling you, such as doing your 401k, or your deferred comp plan. That. Isn’t really any tax advice. It’s just deferring taxes instead, plate checkers, or instead of playing checkers, place chess with your taxes and pay little to taxes by changing your color, your money, or in their income to passive income.

So you can use your passive losses from your real estate to zero that out as best as you can. And maybe even if you wanna get jazzed up, do some rep status there. All to, and then, maybe do a little infinite banking. If you guys wanna get more information on infinite banking, you guys can get the infoPage at infoPage@simplepassivecashflow.com/banking, but help me out and buy the book.

Spread the good word folks. We’ll continue on multi-housing news, how the housing shortage became a crisis. So the US under produced 3.8 million of housing between 2012 and 2019. The shortfall is double what it was seven years ago. The problem is exasperating itself by crumbling infrastructure, ratio, inequality, climate change, and climate events.

And while under supply impacts residents at all income levels, lower and residents of color suffer the most. Three root causes for this is missing households that would have formed if units were available and affordable, insufficient availability and uninhabitable units, which is why we like to invest in this type of stuff, cuz there’s a growing demand for it. And it’s something that. As new inventory comes online, it doesn’t really directly compete with your class B or C asset.

The class stuff actually helps you because it pushes the price points up and up, which we have another article discussing later today. But it’s just that you don’t really have direct competition. This is why I don’t like self storage investing because. Even when you’re, you always wanna buy a type of storage because everybody wants to go to the 24 hour air condition, very highly secure using tech, lot of tech in their self storage.

But if somebody builds a new self storage facility next to yours, that’s why I’m not a big fan of that. That asset class I do like bolt storage though. RV storage. Multi-housing news also reports multi-family investing in a high inflation economy. So our economy has shifted to, from manufacturing to a service based one.

And we have a Fed that is very proactive with arsenal tools that have really deployed to manage economic growth. Again, if you, this is all new to you guys, check out the infoPage at simplepasscash.com/Duncan. Great primer, and feel free to share that with your friends. The current high inflation environment with the prospects of higher treasury rates have led both investors and lenders to reassess their underwriting assumptions along with feature valuations and cap rates combined with the uncertainty over exit cap rates in light of increasing treasury rates, multifamily investors are having to temper their pricing in order to achieve acceptable rate adjusted returns.

Here’s my quote here. I haven’t seen a lot of deals where they are still assuming that rents are gonna go up 3% every year. And their exit cap rates are still pretty high or pretty low. The importance of relationships, both on the debt and equity capital is Parabon in order to access capital to take advantage of this temporary market dislocation.

Talk about is right, Frank. Now it’s currently in a little bit of a bar market. Like I said, if you are somebody who isn’t the best investor out there, but Hey, you have a lot of money and you buy stuff, cash. This is the ideal situation for you still. I wouldn’t rec I wouldn’t do it, but, right now the prices are a little low it’s only problem is lending and there, you never have a time when things are always good and all signs clear.

and you’re always gonna have some kind of way to things where there’s always gonna be seemingly, headwinds in the way, if not, that’s when the prices start to go away and which it was getting there prior to, 20, late 20, 21, or, 2018, I would say, thankfully, we had that whole pandemic thing.

Re business online reports, Redfin US residential media and asking rates of 14.1% in June on annual basis. Redfin is the big real estate online real estate brokerage reported national rents in June. Went up 14.1% year over year. The June figure is a slight increase from. Which is what I’ve been telling everybody, rents are still aggressively going up and this is another reason why it’s a great time to be buying right now.

The rent growth is slowing because landlords are seeing demand start to ease as renters get pinched by inflation. But, I think this is the thing I always highlight for folks like, despite what you read the word recess. Rents are still going up. It’s just, it’s not going up at the crazy price it once was, which is a good thing.

I think that crazy pace was UN unsustainable. All I personally want is a little bit of growth. Like one to 3% rents are still climbing unprecedented rates in strong job markets like New York and Seattle and areas like San Antonio and Boston, that sort of popularity during the pandemic. And here are the top 10 markets that saw the biggest jump in June, Cincinnati, Seattle, Austin, Nashville, New York city, NASSAU county, New York, new Brunswick, New Jersey, New York, New Jersey, Portland and Sam Antonio

Yardi matrix, reports, multifamily rents rise again in June. Yardi made check reports. Average us multifamily rents roles, another $19 in June. Again, this is the same thing that we just mentioned. The increase was filled by strong demand and rent growth throughout the country. So this is a different type of environment.

This isn’t like 2008, lending is very different, at least on the residential side. You don’t have the ninja, no doc, no job, no income type of loans. There’s a lot of controls on lending and that’s what’s bogging down future investor mojo. Is that the lack of the capital market’s lack of lending availability?

Not that the deals are too expensive. The expectation for the remainder of 22 is for rents to increase at slower rates as the economy cools off. But that doesn’t mean that it’s going backwards. There’s always one thing I always say if I were to bet, if the rents don’t go down for very long, I would probably say what’s long, maybe longer than a six to 18 month period.

It. Unfortunately for people who rent, it’s always not gonna come outta your pocketbook at the end of the day, as gas prices rise, like the airlines just pass it off to their customers. And so things are going pretty well in, I don’t know about the economy, but as far as if you’re an investor getting your money working in real estate, and in rentals, And it’s going so well that like the class, a multifamily units are doing really right now, as wealth management.com reports rent growth will not maturity, slow down until demand cools, vacancy ticks up and will happen.

If, and when, afford becomes a headwind, if the job markets subsidy. This is what kind of my whole thesis is. If there’s any type of trouble in the economy, any type of recession who’s gonna get hurt. People who own their own houses, they’re gonna get foreclosed and where are they gonna go?

They’re gonna cascade down to class A apartments, class B apartments, class C apartments. This is right now. You’re seeing the class A apartments do really well because people can’t afford to buy houses because the cost of their lending, their interest rates have gone down. So it’s a cause and effect thing.

And I think it’s important to find those asset classes, those sectors, those, those wealth gaps where you want to participate based on your sec, your viewpoint of the economy and how things work. And in my opinion, only class C and B apartments in class B and areas are where it’s.

I know a lot of people like to buy these class a apartments, I’d say you might as well build them and sell them to suckers who wanna buy them and operate ’em. I just, I think it’s a sector that’s really performing really right now because people cannot afford houses and they are just gonna go rent.

They have a $1,500 a month, $2,500 a month class A apartment. But. I don’t see that really continuing, or I see that as a catch mode currently right now.

So here’s an example of a class A apartment right here. American capital group or committees real estate partners, diverse a blank apartments Kirkland, Washington for 242 million. So this is a class A apartment, and this is. Like a business plan that I would like to personally get into is like building these developments, scratch, creating a tremendous amount of value, add, and then selling it off to a mom and Paul syndicate, who have silly investors who really like these pretty pictures and that’s how they sell their deals.

But then, this is, to me, the risk of operating these high end apartments. Right now it’s doing really well because a lot of people in houses cannot afford to buy the loans, the higher interest rate and their affordability is backtracking. As of maybe a couple months ago, I just don’t see that shrink continuing.

And I think that there’s some leveling off of it. And I just think there’s just more long term stability in the B class asset, one level of this type of stuff. But yeah, I wanna do exactly what these guys do. Harper, who is a direct Fannie Mae. Freddie Mac lender says that Fannie Mae Freddie Mac expects a mission to deliver liquidity as stability and affordability. The agencies committed to enhance the ability and affordability of challenged markets by providing greater liquidity over the next three years.

Things tightened up in the capital markets and people aren’t able to afford their super expensive house simply because of the cost of. Interest rates went up a little bit and that directly impacts affordability. And that impacts a lot of people on the fringes. And that’s where the, Fannie Mae, Fred Mac are saying here where they’re redating and, changing up their targets for the future lending.

And this is always gonna happen. This has been happening since the beginning, when I’ve invested, they always make these micro adjustments. Take another run at it. Things just keep continuing and continuing. This is why I always tell investors, don’t really get too excited about any one thing . There’s always these small types of corrections here or there and at least how I’ve seen for the most part things typically work in a control band.

And I think people get too much into the headlines. Garbage headlines from your CNBCs, your yahoos that are placating out to the average consumer out there, trying to just sell headlines of fear, dooming blue. But this is what’s happening in the more industry newsletters like this, which I try to find for you guys.

They’re looking to do increased loan purchase activity at foster. Product innovation to enable the use of manufacturing houses and unique development scenarios. Fannie Mae is one of the leading sources, liquidity for manufacturing and affordable housing. They’re trying to work on the problem and so those of you guys don’t know Fannie Mae F Mac is your government arm, pseudo government arm to get that money out there to the people who need it the most.

To buy houses because some people still think that, everybody should buy a house to live in, even though that’s not really going to happen. They’re trying to get the people on the fringes that sort of deserve it to get ’em over the edge, which I think is a good thing. Bloomberg reports from billionaire Samal warns that the Fed needs to break the inflation mindset and says he doesn’t think that the US is currently in a recession.

I’ll try and I guess I’ll try and summarize what I talked about in my other hour-long, half long webinar with my insiders in our group. But basically you have inflation all the time. I don’t wanna say all time high, but a pretty, moving average of 9.1%. Last I checked it, which is three times what they want it to be at most.

They usually want it to be one to three. So what’s going on is that you’re seeing the Fed increase the amount of interest rate, which is called, quantitative tightening after quantitative easing is what they did previously, which is essentially creating fake money and creating all these government entitlement programs to basically lift us out of a pandemic created recess.

Which I think is a good thing to do. And this is coming from somebody who really doesn’t like too much government control, but I think that’s what the government is supposed to do. When the country shuts down for several months, we need a little bit of outside interjection that stabs to the heart of adrenaline to keep us going after a pandemic.

And that’s what happened. A whole bunch of money got pumped into the system, which is called quantitative easing. Then now it created a lot of it and made everybody’s stock market go up, easy come easy go. And everybody’s like house prices sort, which is obvious, this byproduct of all this printing of fake money.

And now we have to reverse a little bit because inflation is too high. Go figure. So this is exasperated by two things, which is. The Ukraine war and the COVID lockdowns in China. So I’ll dissect that a little bit. So, the Ukraine war, what that’s doing is putting some restrictions on the fuel.

I think you guys, Russian oil and stuff like that, and it’s gum things up there and the COVID in China, most of you guys are probably wondering. y’all are still playing COVID pandemic out there, yeah. We might be over it, mentally in America, but in China, they’re still doing that, with a zero COVID policy.

And even though it may be a little outdated and overboard at this point, it is what it is, political affiliations beside, and don’t matter, like it’s what China’s doing and the result is. That the people in China, aren’t in the factories, giving us Americans the cheap labor that we need to push our businesses forward, which is creating a lot of issues in terms of supply chain, which is also further exasperating, the inflation and the relation that’s happening there is if I’m a business owner and I typically.

Use China labor or outside Asian cheaper labor outside, that’s effectively in a way better technology. So I don’t have that at my disposal right now. And that dang Ukraine war is coming up my operations. So these are the damages at play. So until either the Ukraine war ends or COVID. In China lightens up a little bit.

We’re in this predicament where there’s not gonna be any outside relief. So that only the levers that the Fed has, the poll is to increase the interest rates, which is to take away money from the system in a way to lower the inflation. And what they want to do is they want to keep doing this UN until that unemployment starts to creep up.

And this is good news, unemployment really. Right now guys, like Google, it is unemployment in America. Look at the chart. We’re at all time lows right now. I dunno all time, but in our lifetime lows, what we want that thing that the Fed is likely doing is they’re planters probably gonna increase the interest rates half a percent, quarter percent watching.

They’re trying to get that inflation back down, but they don’t wanna do it too much. So that unemployment goes. Because unemployment goes up, that’s it’s a, that’s a harder, relation to fix at the end of, at the end of it. But that’s if you start injecting more in interest taking money away from the system, but don’t break it by having unemployment skyrocket over eight to 10%.

Now it’s a fine balance. And it’s also. Made a lot more difficult because there’s slack in the system and there’s more slack in the system than Norma, as there’s so much liquidity reserved. So it’s really hard to determine, if the fed increases the rates by point, seven, five tomorrow, it’s not it’s not like by next week, Wednesday, it’s gonna be, unemployment will be this and inflation be back down to 7% and we’re well, on our way, to getting it under 5%, it just doesn’t work like.

And that’s what makes it difficult for the Fed. It’s very simple relations, but, and I use this analogy and other things, but it’s like a cruise ship trying to turn back around. You obviously don’t want an overcorrection with too much government intervention and, in terms of too much interest rate hikes, we’ve still got a long way off till what, where we were in what, 1985.

And. We’ve got our Hawaii retreat that I’m planning in January and 2023. And I’m thinking of making it some kind of like a throwback to the 1985 era where we had 11% rates. Maybe, basically just give people an excuse to wear really ugly Hawaii Aloha shirts. But anyway, if you guys haven’t yet checked out our family office ohana mastermind.

Simple passive casual flow.com/journey. If you’re tired of these free meetup groups with low network investors who aren’t serious, we have over 90 members in this group. Of course, if you haven’t checked out what’s kind inside of our education platform, you can join for free at simplepassivecashflow.com/club.

And check out my book. You guys can download it for free at simplepassivecashflow.com/book. Help me out. Buy a book, leave me a review of trying to get over a hundred reviews there and we’ll see you guys next month. Bye.

“Buy This, Not That” With Sam Dogen, the Financial Samurai

What’s up simple passive cashflow listeners. Today, we have Sam Dogen from the Financial Samurai. He’s got a book coming out and we wanted to discuss that and his story and what I really wanted to tease out. A lot of you guys have financial freedom, but there’s not really anybody you guys have to interact with who tells you what’s on the other side, after you’ve gone zero gravity or hit that escape velocity and your passive income is greater than your expenses.

But Sam, I didn’t realize we’d be talking ever, cuz we’ve been reading your financial blog since the beginning of my financial blog journey. Just to give people some insight. I graduated high school in 2003, and then somewhere in like freshman, sophomore year, when I didn’t have any money, I started to read all these financial blogs and yours was one of those that would keep coming up.

It perplexes me that I would read such stuff when I was broke, and didn’t have any money. And that’s what I tell a lot of, the listeners are a lot of the kids. If they don’t have money, most kids don’t care. Less weird ones like me but yeah, it’s nice to finally meet you financial samurai.

And for those of you guys, he still does his blog, which you guys can go and visit financial samurai.com. And I gave you a lot of credit Sam, like most of the guys who were doing it, when you did and got traction, they sold out, right? Like Mr. Money Mustache. I can’t even remember all of them, but they all sold out to larger companies.

And now it’s all you. Quite labeled and put out like that. But yours is still raw and it provides good insight for folks. Let’s get into the interview here. Maybe Sam, maybe just go over your quick background. Cause I think it’s very similar to a lot of the listeners today.

Thanks for having me. I started financial samurai in July, 2009, right at the bottom of the financial crisis. And it was just a way to make sense of all the destruction and the chaos because I have been working in finance since 1999. And, I’ve been saving and investing aggressively cuz I wanted to get out.

I didn’t really enjoy the work after the 10th year. And so when I started losing all my money, I mean I lost 35% of my net worth in six months that took 10 years to build. I am really pretty much afraid for my future. And so that’s when financial samurai was born, and by 2012 it was making, livable income stream.

But I was able to negotiate a severance that paid for many years of living expenses. So I decided, what, if I can get the severance I’m outta here, even though I’m only 34 years old, I just didn’t want to do the same thing over and over again. Life just felt too short. So I escaped. Yeah. So any type of instance when you were working that kind of was like, no, you know what, I’m gonna write this blog or did it all just slowly over time happen for you?

So I started going to Berkeley for business school part-time in 2003. Also because I thought I might get laid off the.com bubble was crashing in 2000, 2001, 2002. It was just, it was bad times. And I thought I had just left Goldman Sachs for two years from 1999 to 2001. And then I joined Credit Suisse in San Francisco.

And so there’s this last in first out type of thought process when you’re letting people go. And I was one of the last people in. So anyway, I started going to business school. Part-time just in case I got let go so that I could go to school. Full-time if I were to let go. And then I decided, oh, maybe I should start a personal finance site because I’m reading a lot of personal finance sites as well.

But nobody has a finance background writing about personal finance. So I said, oh, maybe I should start. So when I graduated in 2006, I was gonna start being a financial samurai. But I ended up not doing so because I was just too busy. And I said it’s time to work. And it’s time to give back to the company that paid for my tuition.

But finally, when I lost so much money in 2009, I had no more excuses not to start. So I said, you know what, let’s do it. Let’s see what happens. I paid some guy $500 on Craigslist to start the site, to do some design and just to get started. And I think that’s the hardest part for a lot of people trying new things to get started because once you start, you’ll learn and you’ll build that momentum.

Yeah, but there’s not many people that can get traction, like how you did, and it does take a little bit of luck, but in a way, it got you that gap to be able to make a little bit more money and kind of accelerate yourself down the financial path. So maybe talk a little bit about how that passive income got built up.

And then when did you finally cut the cord on the day job, the w. Yeah. So I worked in equities and that means my compensation and my career were tied to the stock market. And so the stock market does well. I do well. The stock market does poorly. I don’t do well. And so my instant thought after the first month of working was, oh man, getting in at 5:30 AM and leaving after 7:00 PM is unsustainable.

I didn’t want to last that long in my career. I knew I couldn’t last that long. And so from then on, I decided to save 50% of my income and reinvested. So I started reinvesting in dividend stocks, CDs, bonds, just whatever. But then what I did was, I was able to get lucky on a dot bomb stock that went from $3,000 to $150,000.

And so I sold out and I said, you know what? I should probably diversify my wealth into real estate. because I saw so many stocks go up huge and then just crash during the 2000- 2001 bubble. So I felt it was just like funny money. So I had better used my luck and I totally believe most of anything is luck.

Anything outside the average is luck. So I was able to convert that funny money stock gains into my first property in 2003, because I knew no matter what, I wouldn’t wake up one day and see my value of my rental property or my property go down 40%. It was a sticky investment, sticky rental income.

And so I started building my real estate portfolio in 2003, saved as much as I could and tried to diversify as much of my funny money or equity income into real assets. Going back to, like when you graduated college to year 10, we have a lot of these guys that will save they’ll max out their 401k.

I don’t know if it’s 25 grand these days, but were you one of these kids or putting away like 50, 70 grand a year from your paycheck to savings? Yeah, that was the easiest step. Back in, I think it was 1999- 2000. I maxed out my 401k at the time was 10,500, but after a while I realized, you can’t take from your 401k until you’re 59 and a half.

And I couldn’t last beyond age 40 in finance. I just knew I couldn’t. So I needed to figure out a way to generate passive income from my taxable portfolios. My taxable online brokerage count or real estate, which was my bread and butter. So that’s what I focused on doing and in San Francisco, you can live as a single person off 50,000 a year, 60,000 a year, but it’s very expensive here.

It’s more expensive than Honolulu. But by the time I left my day job in 2012, my investments were generating about $80,000 a year in passive income, which was a total livable income stream. I’m not bawling out buying fancy stuff and doing all that, but it was enough to leave and to take the leap of faith.

And because I had a severance package that paid for five years of living expenses, I said at the age of 34, that’s like leaving at age 39 or 40, which was my original target.
I did the same thing. I set away an X amount of money. I think it was like 50 or a hundred grand. And I figured that would be enough personal expenses to get me down the road a couple of years. And surely I would find out if this real estate syndication business would be successful by then.

But just to get an insight, cuz I think a lot of people are using folks like yourself as the test pilot in a way, in different terms, right? Fat fire, lean fire.

I’ll define the first two. Maybe you could define the other two that you coined, like barista fire and the others. But I would say I personally like fat fire. I don’t buy stupid things, but I buy things that are, hold its value over time. I do like nicer cars. I would buy an iPad.

If I’m gonna buy an iPad, I’m gonna buy the best freaking one. Or, but some people are lean fire where they’re just, these are the personal finance bloggers that retire with 800 grand. And they calculate that they can live off 45 grand for the rest of their life. And I’m scratching my head, but what’s the other two?

And where did you personally fit into all of this and maybe has it changed over the years? I think first of all, everybody’s lifestyle is different. So you gotta just accept it the way it is here in San Francisco. You qualify for low income housing. If you make under 115,000 a year and with a family of two children, and I have two kids.

And so my idea was to live off as an individual off $80,000 a year in investment income. When my wife left her day job at age 34 and a half as well. We decided to go for 150,000, just equality, doubling that number. And then we would add about $50,000 for each child because it’s expensive, right?

Preschool is like 2,500 a month. We pay for unsubsidized healthcare, which is now 2200 a month. And this is after taxes. So when I first left in 2012, I would say I was. You can call it wifi, actually wife, financial retirement, financial independence, because my wife who’s three years younger than me kept on working.

So I got her health insurance benefits and I told her if everything works out after three years, you two can join me by retiring early, cuz we believe in equality. And so WIFI is one way. Barista fire is interesting because. What if you take a job? I always thought maybe I’d take a job at Coldstone Creamery down in Honolulu somewhere and just get some health insurance, be a bartender or something like that.

So long as I can get some health insurance, like disaster insurance, that would be really helpful. Then you’d make whatever it’s $15 an hour or some spending money. And, you eat a lot of ice cream for free or drinks. So that’s barista fire, where you get a job, get some healthcare benefits and you fill that gap.

So you’re doing like. Just whatever, easy job to fill in that gap. But in terms of like the fat fire, lean fire, all that it’s just a gradation of how much you wanna spend in your daily day lifestyle. For us, I’ve done the calculations and you look at my budget for a family of four to live a middle class lifestyle in San Francisco is over $200,000 a year after taxes.

Yeah. Before taxes. 200 to 300,000 a year. And if you can make sure that you’re living fine, you have a house, you have a car, you go on vacations. So that’s my definition of what I want in terms of my post work life. So a lot of the listeners to hear are guys in that million dollar to few million dollar range.

Obviously you’ve moved past that, but what are some of the insights of early financial independence moving from that particular airspace that you can recall from your journey? In 2012, I left with about 3 million at age 34. And that was through like 13 years of 50 to 80% savings and investing.

And what I discovered was, even though I lost 80% of my income, my active income caused me to lose my job. I was happier because I had all the freedom in the world. I didn’t have anybody telling me what to do. I could wake up whenever I wanted without an alarm clock. I could play tennis at 11:00 AM, go boogie boarding at 3:00 PM after an afternoon siesta.

So what you should realize is that you probably won’t need as much as you think. Because you will gain so much more freedom and you’ll be much happier. So when I was 33, I started to get gray hairs, a lot of gray hairs, and I had like jaw pain. I had back pain, all that stuff. And when I left about six months after I left, cause I felt so much more relaxed.

The gray hair started going away and I stopped losing my hair. And so now at 45, I’m like, Hey, I still got my hair. I don’t have that pain as much anymore. And it was just, it was like that feeling of just freedom and a lightness from your shoulders. It was just priceless. It really was, and is priceless.

I don’t think people realize when you’re in the grind, you’re in a banking consulting industry, law, doctor, whatever, any high income paying job you’ve got. There’s a lot of stress and pain. And I don’t think people realize how much stress and how much pain they’re going through and they’re just sucking it up and keeping it hidden and just withholding it until they finally leave.

Now, what do you say to this kind of person? They get on the path to financial freedom. It’s not gonna be as instantaneous as nothing is, but they start to realize that FI is maybe three to six years down the road. And they somehow find a less stressful job, they stop caring a little bit.

It’s very close but they justify it as keeping a day job. As their kids are, your guys’ kids’ age. You can’t take them outta school. Like really can’t really travel too much because they’re stuck in school and you only can take ’em out four times and maybe a long summer.

These are like the. Gradations of possibilities and they’re good options. Would you still argue for just knocking it in the head and get to FI and quit? Or is that a good option? I think the luckiest people are the ones who find work that they love to do. I didn’t find that, I was miserable after the first year, but I gutted it out after 13 years of switching jobs.

So that was in a new city. So that was pretty fun going from New York city to San Francisco, but in terms of finding that lower paying job that provides more balance, I think that’s great because the ultimate goal is to do something that provides a meaning and purpose where you can still have a balanced and secure lifestyle, going all or nothing is extreme. And I did that because my job stock was like 60, 70 hours a week. Lot of stress, it just didn’t feel worth it, but that’s the irony, if I didn’t have a really stressful job right. Outta school I probably wouldn’t have saved as aggressively. I wouldn’t have learned as much about investing and trying to diversify my wealth. What did you do right outta college?

Same thing. My job absolutely sucked. I was traveling a hundred percent of the time and they treated me like crap funny guy construction, that was just how it is. So suck your job the more you want to get out. So if you can find that job that provides good balance. I would consider yourself blessed. Why bother trying to get to FI. Yeah, to me that ‘s a trifecta you can have, if you have one of these two things, you’re fine, which is you enjoy what you do, which I didn’t.

Number two, you like who you work with and then number three, you like your boss. If you have two of the three of those, consider yourself lucky. Yeah. If you have all three of them, don’t tell anybody. Cuz you’re probably living a dream, but yeah. Sometimes. As you’re trying to pass down this wealth and legacy, sometimes the insight of this struggle going through was what was needed to come to this path and this realization.

But I guess moving on, you’ve transcended to past that, end game mark, right? What are, what were some of the takeaways? Yeah. And some of the epiphanies that happen that you progress through? The first thing is it’s really jolting once you. No longer do your day job for however many years, right?

Because 40, 50, 60 hours a week, you’re spending that’s your identity. So once you stop doing that it’s very disconcerting. Not comfortable. And there’ll be a point maybe six months, maybe a year where you’ll feel lost. You’ll not know what to do because there’s only so many tennis matches you can play.

There are only so many European churches you can see before they all start looking the same. And you need to find something you enjoy doing that provides purpose because without purpose you’ll feel lost, you’ll probably feel sad. You might even get depressed. And so it shows that money is not the answer to all your problems.

Money is money helps with you not worrying so much about money or where your meal is gonna be. If you can get those stresses away and provide for your family, you’re gonna feel less stress, but it still leaves that hole of what to do. So it’s important before you leave your job. To know what you’re gonna do, retire to something, not from something.

And I recently celebrated my 10 year anniversary of being an early retiree and I called myself a fake retiree because these posts don’t write themselves. My book, buy this, not that it took two years to write. It takes a lot of work, but it provides a lot of meaning and purpose. And so that’s why I feel really lucky.

I feel like I have that trifecta that you mentioned. My wife is a really good boss. I like what I do, and I feel like I provide purpose. Yeah. The concept of ikigai, something good for the world. Obviously I’m a reader. Something you can monetize, something you’re halfway decent at and something you enjoy.

Yeah. But, I think it ‘s rare to find somebody, somebody to find something that hits on all four of those checkboxes. It’s rare, but I don’t know how much effort we really put in. Making to try to get those four things or those three out of the four, two out of the four.

You gotta be really intentional. If you wanna achieve financial freedom, you gotta be intentional by making a plan, reverse engineering that plan and figuring out how to get there year by age, whatever it is. And it’s the same thing with finding purpose in your life. How we go through the motions and then we wake up five to 10 years later and wonder.

What are we doing with our lives or where did all our money go? But if you’re intentional with your purpose to figure out what exactly you want to do, have you spent an hour a week figuring that out, talking to someone? I would say most people don’t, they just go to work and then they go watch football and basketball, and then they go back to work again on Monday.

So I’d be more intentional. Yeah. I would say it’s very possible to be, get to financial independence, doing it passively on the side, on. 30 minutes every day after work. But to me, and I like to hear your thoughts on this stem, but as far as finding purpose, something that hits ikigai for you, I feel like you need to really not have a day job.

Number one, and like to go through this I call it like an air bubble, like six months or maybe several years where you just don’t do Jack and you just sit and ponder what you’re gonna do. Have that inkling, what you’re gonna do before you pull the cord? Yeah, I started a financial ceremony in 2009 while I was working.

It was a side hustle. It was just my journal, but I loved it so much. I would wake up at 5:00 AM to go write. I would come back, eat, and I couldn’t wait to get going, writing or connecting with people online after 9:00 PM. And that’s all I really thought about before and after work. And so it was a point where after two and a half years, I was like, you know what?

This is fun. I know it’s, you can make some money off of it to subsidize my severance pay and my passive income. So why not go for it? Because the worst case scenario is. I failed. And then I just go back to work at age 36 or 37. That’s the thing it’s like the worst, your fears in your head are often way worse than reality.

Yeah. I’m curious how your wife went through this search for an ikigai. Cause I think cats like yourself and myself and a lot of the listeners, were pretty intentional. Like even if we didn’t have a job, we’ll figure something out. Yeah, sometimes the spouses are just going along for the journey.

Did you need to help her figure it out or maybe give us a little insight there? We met in college at the college of William and Mary. She worked in finance. The back end, I worked front end, and we have always been together since college and we’ve always been on the same game plan.

So we had goals. Where do you wanna live? I wanted to live in New York city cuz I wanted to try it at least once. Where do you ultimately wanna live? I want to live in San Francisco or California because it’s a great lifestyle. It’d be nice to go to Hawaii as well. And then, so we always were on the same page in terms of our goals and we always reconvene every month, every six months, every year to make sure we were together as a team working towards those goals.

So when she saw me leave at age 34, Guess what she too was like, oh, I would like to leave my job cuz she didn’t like her job either. And after 10 years of doing one thing, it gets boring. It doesn’t matter what you do. Even if you’re an NBA baller, I have a friend who was on the Warriors and he won three championships after a while.

He’s yeah, I’m good. I’m good. I don’t, traveling, all that time for six months a year is too tough. I think I’m good right now. And it wasn’t hard for her to convince her to join me in fake retirement at the age of 34 as well. So we had a plan, I said three years, I’m gonna try to boost our passive income to 150,000.

And if that happens and if the financial samurai is still around and still growing or still doing okay, you two can leave, but before you leave, please take the advice. And negotiated a severance. So we had a perfect plan where she negotiated a severance. It was like a six figure severance and it was worth about six figures in the sense that she decided to work two to three days a week with the same pay and do that for three to three, it was like at least three to six months.

And that was like a great transition. And so we were always on the same page. So I guess to answer your question, just make sure you have regular dialogues with your teammate, because at the end of the day, you’re a team and that was another, not to openly promote another book that you have in confuse everybody, but you’ve wrote another, book on that whole severance pay, right?

Yeah. Negotiating that. Yeah. How to engineer your layoff, how to negotiate a severance, basically, because if you’re gonna leave your job early, You might as well, try to negotiate a severance, especially if you’ve been there for longer than a couple years, the longer you’ve been there, the more important it is to try to negotiate a severance, because if you quit and you say peace out, you’re leaving your boss and your colleagues in lurch.

It’s hard to find a replacement. It might take three months to find someone and then it might take another three months to train them up to speed. So if you can negotiate a severance, why not? Don’t break up with someone over text message or ghost. Have a dialogue and say, Hey, how can I help find my replacement?

Train my replacement to ensure that there is seamless transition and as a reward, how about a severance package? And if you get laid off, you might get a severance package, but you also are eligible for unemployment benefits for up to 26 weeks usually. And we, you hit the honey hole with our podcast listeners. A lot of ’em are just on the edge there.

The best advice I had was just like, maybe just say you’re crazy or something, and then you can go on medical disability or something like that. That was the best advice I had. So I recommend everybody check out that book, but let’s talk about the new one.

Buy this not that which is available on Amazon. Yeah. It’s available everywhere. Buy this, not that. How to spend your way to wealth and freedom. I started writing it in early 2020. Finished it in 2022. It’s with a portfolio penguin, random house. And it’s a book about helping you achieve financial independence sooner rather than later, but more importantly, it’s a book about using a proper decision making framework to tackle some of life’s biggest dilemmas.

And these dilemmas can include, should I live in a low cost area of the country to save money or move to New York city where it’s super expensive, but the career opportunity is greater. Should I join a startup or should I join an established firm? Should I. Have children early or later, should I invest in stocks for real estate?

So I really tackle a lot of these big dilemmas because at the end of the day, money is just a means to an end, to have a better life, to have a greater life, more purposeful life. And I don’t want people looking back on their lives with regret that they didn’t try or that they didn’t make the right decision because they didn’t know what to do.

The great saying. If I knew then. What I know now things would be better. Things would be different. So the easiest way to never say that again, is to learn from people who’ve been through what you might go through and that’s the purpose of buying. That’s not that right. Never take advice from those who are not financially free.

As I say for those of you guys, who’ve checked out my book, I do this in a very paradigm manner. I think. The section where I say like the mistakes of what, how people do investing in 401ks and stuff like that, and buying a house to live in early, that’s basically what Sam’s book is, but all of it, and he goes into many more of these binary decisions, this is This, for a lot of analytical people, like this is what my marriage counselor or my tool book tells me is like people who are analytical and there’s a lot of you guys out there, you probably get really pissed off when your spouse tells you to explain why you’re doing something or why you guys should do something because you did like fifth, like five hours of like analysis in your head.

And you don’t like to explain it. And that’s how I am. But. I think the nice thing about this book is there’s a lot of things in there, like where I would just say, just don’t start a startup, right? If you’re not looking for cash. But Sam goes through each of these little aspects and takes the time.

And I personally don’t really listen to podcasts these days cuz you can’t get much in books 40 minutes, 50 minutes, it’s all like just a tip kind of information. I’ve fallen back to the basics of reading books, because to put a book together it’s long form contact, you actually need to think about what you’re writing.

It has to be concise, cuz it’s gonna live out there forever. Where to meet podcasts are like TikTok to books in a way short form content. And it’s just the surface. Took out the book, buy this, not that But I don’t know anything else. You think that our avatar out there you’d like to kinda.

Do you have many more insights or anything you think we missed there, Sam? I think just from this, not that one of the core principles is to encourage you to think in probabilities, not absolutes. So don’t think you need a hundred percent certainty before making a decision. Otherwise you’re gonna miss out on so many opportunities.

I didn’t know, with a hundred percent certainty, that if I left my day job in banking, that was paying really well. That I’d be okay. I didn’t know that, but I had a good feeling, at least a 70% chance that I would turn out. Okay. So I have a 70, 30 decision making framework that says, if you believe there’s a 70% probability or greater that you’re gonna make the right choice, I say, go for it while having the humility and understanding, knowing that about 30% of the time, hopefully less you’ll get it wrong, but unless it’s a catastrophic.

You’re gonna be fine because you’re gonna learn from your mistakes and learn how to be a better decision maker going forward. So think of probabilities, because life is, there’s no certainty in life, you always have to be calculating. Is this the right decision or not? But you start thinking about probabilities regularly.

If things become more and more like a matrix where you can see, oh, so you can figure it out. And it becomes a huge competitive advantage. When you’re going into battle with anybody or any kind of competitive situation. Did you make up that 70, 30 thing? Because I’ve heard it before from a CPA to being named nameless that if there’s a 70% chance he’s gonna win an audit, he just does it.

He takes the risk and does it. I have never heard of it, but that’s my internal mantra, cuz I’ve been working on the trading floor for 13 years. We make bets all the time. We make prop bets. Can you eat $35 worth of taco bell in one hour without puking? For example, that’s like what we do. We take tiger woods or the field with five to one odds.

We’re always making bets. And I think this decision making framer has been honed in me since working on the trading floors at Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse for 13 years. And so it’s helped me think about things because a lot of people, they don’t have the right risk parameters in place. They don’t have any probabilities in place, you can really pick people off if you want to, by throwing out these different lines of risk. And that’s what, like the professional oddsmakers do in Vegas or in the UK, they create these odds that are, try to be as 50, 50 as possible. So they’ll never lose and they’ll just earn a spread.

And so that’s how you have to think, but I don’t think most people think that way, they just think, ah, I’m gonna wing it, or I gotta believe a hundred percent. That I’m gonna get the job before I apply, because there’s a lot of uncertainty and there’s a lot of fear. And when you start thinking about probabilities, you start gaining more courage.

And I think half the battle is being the courage, having the courage to go for what you want and being true with yourself. Yeah. And it, yeah, distills down to uncertainty, right? Like people who aren’t very successful, they just don’t. They just cling onto what’s certain. But I think another part of that is having enough net worth in a very secure thing, like infinite banking or something where you can hang your hat on, allowing you to hold onto the side of the pool as you go and make bigger shots.

I know, as you’ve expanded from your writings, you expanded into more venture capital stuff. And I tell PE other people look just because these higher net worth guys are doing something doesn’t mean you should. That’s why we people will start with the basics, just go after cash flow first because you cannot sustain a fall or a bad deal like Lane and Sam can.

But yeah, I think the biggest thing is just, read the book and just fill your mind with good stuff. So you have, can actually hold a conversation and expand your network with other people doing this. It’s so funny. So this is my first traditionally published book and it took so long.

So now that I’ve written a book, I appreciate every single book that has been published that comes to my doorstep. Or I see it on a bestseller list because I know how hard it was to write a book. Mine took two years, 15 plus revisions over and over again, polished. And golf is boring when you watch on TV, but if you play golf, If you actually get on the field, then suddenly it will be amazing.

And so definitely reading books. I agreed to read more books, people. The wealthiest people, the smartest people in the world, are reading books all the time, because it is written by an expert in that field. And it’s really hard to get a literary agent and it’s even harder to get a book published by a big publisher, like the gaunt.

It’s impossible. I tried to get a literary agent 10 years ago, and I got rejected by everyone. And so I spend more time reading books. It’s the best return on your investment ever. Let’s say you spend $27 or $25 buying a book. If it’s a good book, which most are the best, the best sellers are. It’ll provide a hundred times more value than the cost of the book immediately.

And that value will compound over time. It reminds me of the concept from Cal Newport deep work. I think that was his book. He’s a fellow portfolio penguin author. So like basically the concept folks have is look, everybody’s lazy and they just go after they just read the headlines.

Nobody reads the article. Everybody just listens to the podcast. That’s easy and they don’t read the dent book. And they don’t do things that are hard or more deeper work stuff. And that’s really where the gold is. Yeah, buy the book folks and listen to a simple passive cashflow podcast, despite what I’m saying, I do think everything is rational long term rational.

And so what I mean by that is if we want something bad enough, we’re gonna figure out a way to get there. And if we don’t figure out a way to get there Chances are high that it’s probably because we didn’t want it bad enough. So I want six pack abs. But I don’t want it bad enough to have a huge caloric deficit diet and do sit ups and pushups and all that every day for the rest of my life.

So forget it. I don’t care, but I do want to have my freedom. And it’s interesting once you have children that time becomes even more valuable because you juxtapose your one timeline against your child’s timeline and your child looks like they grow up way quicker than you, because they’re always changing and they’re always learning and developing.

And so personally I’m afraid to lose that freedom by having to go back to work, because I know my kids will be 13 years old one day and never want to hang out with dad anymore. They wanna hang out with their friends and then they’re gonna go to college and I’m sure 90% of their lifetime will be already spent.

And that’s it. Time is done. So I hope people can also feel the urgency of time to calculate what their time is worth. Because if you lose 35% of your investment portfolio or net worth in the next bear market, you have to calculate how much time based on your savings rate and your income, you will need.

To gain back those paper losses. And if it is more than 12 months for me, forget it, I don’t wanna do it. So that’s why my risk tolerance is relatively low. But if you’re young and you say I’m willing to work for three years at my saving rate to gain back my losses, then you have a high risk tolerance, then go for it. Take that bet. Swing for the fence. Great insights Sam. Again, folks Buy This, Not That on Amazon, and we’ll see you guys next time. Aloha. All right. Good chatting.

U.S. Dollar STRONGER Than the Euro | Podcast With Richard Duncan Part 2

Hey folks, this is part two of the podcast with Richard Duncan. If you have not heard about him, you can check out all the past interviews we’ve done with him at simplepassivecashflow.com/Duncan And if you haven’t checked out podcast number one with him, which we did the past week, I’ll make sure you go check that out.

First, it’ll set the foundation for our continuation of our part two podcast. And a lot of this is gonna be talking more about current EF and future facing where I think a lot of the older stuff is more foundational, credit is getting off the gold standard, things like that, but enjoy the show you.

So you’re a good teacher and I watch all your videos like a fanboy. And I understand this. So at what point are they gonna start to taper off of the interest rate increases?

Is there a certain unemployment rate they key in, on, or trying to shoot for? Cause it, it is a game of a little bit of this, watch that meter put a little bit of that and go back and forth. They’re in a very difficult position of course, because most of this inflation is being driven by the supply chain bottlenecks over which they don’t have any control whatsoever.

They. Semiconductor prices shot up and that pushed up the price of new cars and that pushed up the price of used cars. So in the second quarter of last year, the used car prices were up 40% year on year. And that accounted for a third of the increase in inflation. The Fed can’t do anything about that.

And the Fed has been hoping that these bottlenecks would be overcome quickly and that the supply side problems would be worked out and would be back where we were in 2019 with globalization, putting downward pressure, strong, downward pressure on inflation, but this has just taken so much longer than they had ever imagined.

There wasn’t just the first round of COVID started in February, March, 2020, and then we got Delta and Delta was another big blow. Delta is the first round that really hit Asia and shut down factories in Asia, and then Delta died down and now we have Army and Army shutting down factories across China.

So these supply side disruptions have lasted much longer and then made things much worse. Russia invaded Ukraine, and that pushed oil prices very much higher. And wheat prices are very much higher. So the Fed has been hoping that if they can just drag their feet a little bit, they don’t want to throw millions of people out of work.

They don’t wanna destroy trillions of dollars of wealth by causing the stock market to fall, but they really don’t have any choice. They have to be seen doing something. And this has been going on for so long now that now they’re actually really starting to get much more aggressive with these 75 basis point hikes and now quantitative tightening has started.

Quantitative tightening is selfish, but if somebody’s out there and they have a pretty stable job and it doesn’t happen, they’re working for the oil and gas industry out in Texas or Oklahoma. And they are, most of their portfolio is in assets that go up with the pace of inflation like real estate.

And that cash flow at the end of the day is not residential real estate, which goes up and down with the motion. Aren’t they sitting pretty right now? Let the Fed cut jobs. I know that’s a heartless thing to say, but isn’t that a good place of power in a way? But how many people are in that situation?

Certainly a minority as a small minority relative to the overall pool of Americans. And. There are a number of things to think about. And so far, the government is still suspending student loans, repayments people who’ve borrowed money through student loans are not having to pay interest on it for the last few years.

That’s going to end some time sometime presumably maybe after the midterm elections, but suddenly all of these people who haven’t been able ha who haven’t been forced to pay interest on their student loans for the last two and a half years are going to have to start paying a lot of money on their student loans again.

And this is going to make it much more difficult for them to go out and rent an apartment. And so that when that occurs, there’s likely to be downward pressure on rents and also mortgage rates have shot up from what below. 3% at the end of last year, to as high as 5.8% a few weeks ago, they could keep moving higher because the Fed is going to destroy it by allowing its the fed almost $2.7 trillion of mortgage back securities and which is acquired through quantitative easing over the last few years.

But now they’re going to start allowing these to run off. And as the Fed shrinks its pool of mortgage backed securities, someone else is going to have to buy those. And that’s going to put upward pressure on mortgage rates, further upward pressure on mortgage rates. So we’re likely to move into a position where property prices are falling and perhaps substantially and you, so how long is this going to go on?

I think it’s going to go on until the inflation rate comes. Significantly. And so the most recent employment numbers that we got just a couple of days ago were pretty discouraging. The consensus estimate was that job growth would be 250,000, which is still pretty strong as it is, but it turned out to be 370,000.

And the unemployment rate stayed at 3.6%. So that means the people still have jobs they’re still going to spend. So that means the Fed has much more work to do in terms of tracking up interest rates before the number of new employees stops increasing and starts shrinking. So we’re in for many more interest rate hikes over the rest of this year and on into next year, I think.

Yes, unless the economy just slows. So suddenly that it goes into a significant recession in the near term. That prices start to fall. Now the one positive note that we’ve seen recently, just over the last couple of weeks is commodity prices are falling pretty sharply over the last three weeks or so.

Oil is down from a peak of 140 to about 100, but also copper wheat, timber loss of metals. They’re all falling very sharply. And so that will help some in terms of alleviating the upward pressure on inflation. But it’s going to take a number of months, even in a good scenario before we see a significant downward shift in the inflation rate.

And before the Fed is in a position to become a little less hawkish. So if I put myself in the head of a business owner, or like a man, like an old school manufacturing company, The feds raised my interest rates. I predict slowing growth, still growth potentially next year, but I may downsize my employment or downsize my head count, but also not buy as much raw materials.

So that makes sense. Yep. And the chances of a recession are really quite high. Now, in fact, technically we may be in a recession because the first quarter, the GDP, and now most people think the second quarter will shrink as well. Although the official data is not out yet. And the traditional definition of a recession is two years of two quarters of economic contraction.

That’s a bit technical, but looking ahead, the chances of the economy shrinking more are really very significant because. The main two themes that run through my work macro watch is that in this new world of creditism credit growth drives economic growth and liquidity determines whether asset prices go up or down.

So credit growth is now contracting when adjusted for inflation, it contracted for two quarters in a row. And as I mentioned earlier, the credit grows by less than 2% adjusted for inflation. The US goes into recession and it’s not only growing at 2% is actually negative. Now for the last two quarters credit growth has been a negative number and that’s signaling something that everyone should be very worried about.

Cuz if it grows by less than 2%, if history isn’t a guide, any guide, the US goes into recession and moreover. The wealth effect that was supplementing credit growth and generating economic growth. After 2009, of course, wealth is being destroyed on a very significant scale. It’s quite possible that total wealth in the US contracted by 10% in the second quarter, that’s my estimate.

Something like 15 trillion of wealth has been destroyed in the first half of the year. So with credit contracting and wealth contracting, those are the main drivers of growth. And so we’re, it looks like we’re moving into a period where there is going to be a significant recession. It just hasn’t hit yet, but it’s likely that we’re going to continue seeing more and more signs of this.

And with the fed, continuing to hike interest rates until a lot of people lose their jobs and the inflation rate comes down well, that hasn’t really even got underway yet. So as the Fed keeps tightening and as the Fed, right now the Fed has started destroying money through quantitative tightening at the rate of 47 billion a month.

That will be 47 billion in June, July, and August. And then it doubles to 95 billion in September and every month after that. And so what that means is because of quantitative tightening, the Fed is going to destroy something like 1.1 trillion a year, as long as this continues. And if it destroys $1.1 trillion, that’s 11% of all the dollars.

And so this is going to cause liquidity in the economy to shrink. Now I have an analogy for this. It’s like quantitative tightening, just imagine. All the investors in the world are in one big ballroom, right? Having a party. And the loud speaker makes this announcement that we’re, here’s the news. We’re going to start pumping the air out of this ballroom gradually.

And the partiers are having a pretty good time. This is going to occur over many months. They don’t really care immediately, but give it a few months, three months, six months. And it starts becoming difficult to breathe in the ballroom. Then panic starts to set in and everybody runs for the exits and people get trampled and it creates quite a calamity.

And so we’re just now at the point where they’ve just made the announcement that we’re about to suck the air outta the ballroom that no one’s having problem breathing now, but give it six months. Yeah. And it will become much more difficult. And they did suck some air out of that, the room, they bumped it up.

So maybe, let me help me if I understand this right. So best case scenario, the war ends and, or COVID kind of gets a little bit more under control and knows supply chain issues. They dissipate, right? And then the fed will probably lower their, or stop hiking rates and keep it, get back to baseline.

People are pessimists out there. The war and cold goes on for a lot longer. And they are fed in a good way, they guide us to a soft landing where they hike up interest rates. They are metic looking at unemployment pops up, but then they catch it at a right, that frequency to land soft landing.

Is that. Is that a, do you see that happening? Or that’s the middle case. And then we can talk about the worst case, I guess later, but is that kind of a good understanding? Yeah. So there are two scenarios, there’s a really bad case scenario where COVID gets worse and the supply chain bottlenecks get worse and the war spreads and globalization completely breaks down.

In which case inflation goes to a much higher level and asset prices lose another 75%. That’s the worst case scenario, not to mention the potential of world war. So that’s the extreme, horrible case scenario. The best case scenario is the war in Russia ends tomorrow with a happy ending and the sanctions are all removed from Russia.

This is a very unrealistically positive scenario and COVID ends tomorrow and no one else catches COVID and it’s all over. And it’s very positive scenario. The. Positive scenario imaginable. It would still take quite a few more months before the inflation rate is going to come back down just because of the momentum.

You still have things like rents are higher and are going to be factored into the CPI numbers. But in the very positive scenario, the yes, say a year from now will be back. And this is an extremely positive scenario. The year from now will be back where we were in 2019. The Fed can possibly even start cutting interest rates and ending quantitative tightening because we got a lot of dry powder at that point because he shakes.

But the more realistic scenario is somewhere in the middle where, not being wildly optimistic or wildly pessimistic, trying to be realistic. This war in Ukraine is not going to end anytime soon. It doesn’t appear. And even if it were to end. There’s no certainty that the sanctions are going to be removed.

And Putin is threatening to essentially cut off not only gas supplies, but oil supplies now. So we could, even though it’s been a little bit weaker recently, it could, some people fear that it could shoot up to two or even $300 a barrel. That’s not impossible if Putin suddenly decides to stop shipping oil at all, and COVID is not going to end immediately.

So what we’re likely the most probable course is somewhere in the middle, where the war keeps going, sanctions keep going. COVID keeps sputtering around China and causing some supply chain bottleneck disruptions, but gradually because of a combination of some of the supply chain bottlenecks being worked out.

I mean for exact, for example, already semiconductor prices are coming down and as I mentioned already, commodity prices are coming down. So this is good news, but it’s going to take some time, the fed strips out the commodity prices. Anyway, when it looks at the core inflation that it really reacts to.

So the most probable scenario is that the Fed is going to continue hiking interest rates probably into the middle of next year. And as it does, inflation will gradually move down in part because of improvements on the supply side, but also because of demand destruction on the demand side, as lots of Americans lose their jobs.

And as more wealth is destroyed. So it is, asset prices have already fallen a lot. NASDAQ is down 30% and a lot of the stocks in NASDAQ of course, are down far more than 30%. A lot of wealth has already been destroyed, but the chances are that we haven’t seen the bottom yet is probable. That stock prices will continue to fall and that property prices will join them.

And so I think we’re in for more paying before, before we get to the other side of this, even in a reasonably good scenario and in the kind of the worst case scenario, the fed totally knocks out the economy and goes overboard with the interest rates, spikes, the fed, the economy overreacts to a adverse reaction to the COVID vaccine in a way it just goes in a tailspin and goes into depression mode.

Yeah, no. There are lots of ways to paint a very bad scenario. The US, if the war expands in Europe and the US then decides to impose sanctions on China, the way it’s done on Russia, because China’s supporting Russia, then globalization would really suffer under that scenario.

And we would probably have much higher rates of inflation, which would mean much higher interest rates and of course, much higher interest rates in the us. This Causes not only problems in the US, but all around the world right now. We have a super dollar, the dollar there’s like a Superman dollar right now.

The dollar index has moved up to more than a 20 year high. The Euro is about one to one with the dollar right now. And the yen is at a 30-24 year low. And normally when the US dollar gets stronger, It’s very bad for the rest of the emerging markets in particular, because they have tended to borrow in dollars.

And when they have to repay the dollars, it’s much more expensive for them to do that. So recall back in the early eighties, when Voker hyped the interest rates to extremely high levels to crush inflation, then that created the third world debt crisis with many of the south American countries defaulting on their debts, which reverberated back to the us banks, which had lent them a lot of money.

There was a period when the US banks were in danger of growing bankrupt because they’d lent so much money to the south American countries and the south American countries couldn’t repay it. So high interest rates you’ll start seeing, corporate defaults all the high yield junk bond defaults, emerging market defaults.

And a lot of problems just through the very strong dollar. Now I wanna get into some of the ideas in your new book, the money revolution. You guys can check it on Amazon, but before we go into kind of the bigger picture, for that the little lowly investor out there who might have a $2 million net worth, we always chuckle and say, that’s the average guy, what should they be doing now with these three past and front that we’ve overlaid?

So 2 million on, in one way is a lot of money. And then another way is very little money. If you’re talking about net worth, then how much of your house is it? What portion of your house is that? Usually I’ll tell you what, like usually when I find these guys, it’s like half of their net worth is in their house, locked up as dead equity.

So they’ve got a million dollars to work with elsewhere then. Yeah. There’s not. Yeah. And, but out of that, it’s even the dimer. So the dimer outlook, like I would say 60 to 80% of that’s locked up in their company sponsored for Wayne K plan. So it’s locked in that stock market game. So I think, for most, for people like that in terms of what they need to be doing is they need to be investing in their business and make sure that their business keeps growing and that they have a business that is resilient as possible and focus on making money through their business rather than trying to make focus on speculating.

These guys, they don’t have businesses, right? Most of these listeners here are like working professionals, employees. I guess you could call your little rental property portfolio or your alternative investment portfolio, an entrepreneur, but for the most part, they’re employee mode.

Sure. I think most, and it’s okay. You can tell ’em they’re screwed and just hopefully that you keep their job, that’s what employees are. So as I mentioned earlier, the net worth of the American public has risen by 90 trillion since 2009, everything went up and looking ahead, starting really from the second quarter of this year, now everything is going down.

There’s really no place to hide. No one guarantees you that there’s always going to be a chance for you to invest somewhere and make money. There are times like these, when you’re likely to lose money, wherever your money is invested, it’s just. Just as it was hard to lose money over the last many years as asset prices inflated.

Now it’s going to be hard not to lose money. It was hard before it was hard not to make money. Now it’s going to be hard not to lose money. That’s just the brutal fact of life. But looking for the long term, young people for instance can invest in rental properties with a long term horizon by, I don’t mean condos.

But I mean buy a piece of land with the rental house on top that you can rent out and build up a long term rental portfolio over the next several decades, okay. Property prices may drop over the next year or two, three years, who knows, but over the long run, as you pay off these mortgages on your rental properties, You can develop a nice portfolio of rental properties over a number of decades that will give you a very comfortable environment when you’re very comfortable retirement when you’re, when you do retire.

So that’s one area. I think that is open to most normal Americans, something that they can manage themselves and don’t have to worry about corporations blowing up or something being mismanaged or fraud, or some exchange going bankrupt and locking up all your assets overnight. I think that’s a reasonable long term strategy, even in this kind of environment with the realization that you may have to watch your property prices fall in the near term.

Yeah. What do you like? I think the common thing I hear a lot from folks is. Oh, geez. I’m just not gonna do anything and just sit on cash. That’s one possible way to play it. You’ll lose some on the inflation side, but you may not lose. As much as you would certainly not be going to lose as much as you would playing a lot of the most speculative asset classes.

Yeah. Certainly not gonna make it big if it is a good, soft landing. That’s true. All right. So let’s go into what, so you have a lot of progressive ideas and what the government should be doing. What’s on your list here, and we don’t have to go into all of ’em, some of the big ones that are in your new book, just to wet people’s appetites and get ’em thinking.

Okay. So the new book is called the money revolution, how to finance the next American century. And it has three parts. The first part is called money and it’s a history of the Fed since it was created in 1913. And it’s important for investors and for everyone to understand the Fed because the Fed is the world’s most powerful economic institution.

It is the US government’s most effective economic policy tool. And last year, if it had been a corporation, it would’ve been the most profitable corporation in the world, more profitable than apple. So what the Fed does, has an enormous impact on the economy and on asset prices. So it’s very important to understand how the Fed works and what it does.

And that is what. Part one explains the most important thing in the Fed’s history in recent decades was when it stopped backing dollars with gold, setting off this money revolution that we’ve been talking about that turned capitalism into creditism. The second part of the book is called credit and it discusses the evolution of creditism and explains how the US economy became addicted to credit growth and why the US economy must have 2% credit growth adjusted for inflation to stay out of recession.

And the third part of the book is called the future. So this book covers a span of 120 years, the first 110 years from the time the Fed was created in 1913, up to the present 110 years, roughly. And the final part of the book is covered in parts one and two. But the final part of the book looks at the next 10 years, the future.

And it tries to draw on the lessons from the past to make recommendations as to what we can do to make the future better. Now, this book was written primarily in, in 2018 and 2019, and it was largely finished by the time COVID started. And as you’ll see, COVID created a very big problem for this book because here’s why, so what I was looking at in 2018 and 2019 was that what we just lived through was the crisis of 2008 and the government’s response to that crisis.

So during that we had a big global credit bubble, it started to blow up into a new, great depression in 2008. And the government by running trillion dollar budget deficits and the fed by creating trillions of dollars in financing, those budget deficits at low interest rates, they managed to reflate the bubble.

And despite all of this extremely aggressive fiscal and monetary stimulus, there was no inflation. The highest rate of inflation we got at the CPI level was 3.8% in 2011. And by 2015, there was actually deflation again, during the first few months of 2015, the CPI was negative. So what lesson should we draw from that?

For just using the Fed, when the Fed creates money, it adds to the monetary base. In 2009, the monetary base grew by 110%. Now, this was roughly four times higher than the peak of world war II money supply growth in world war II. And we still didn’t get any inflation. Now, the classical economic theory, it always, and the Austrian theory tells us that, like Milton Friedman said, inflation is always and everywhere, a monetary phenomenon, but clearly that’s not true because the money supply grew by 110% in 2009.

And the inflation peaked at 3.8%. So the lesson that I drew from that was if in fact we can, the government can run trillion dollar budget deficits, and the fed can create trillions of dollars to finance those deficits. At low interest rates in this new economic environment, we find ourselves in creditism, then we should make the most of this.

And what I recommend in the third part of the book. Is that over the next 10 years, the us government should finance a multi-trillion dollar investment program, targeting the industries and technologies of the future, because it seemed that it was very easy for the government to to spend trillions of dollars and the fed to finance trillions of dollars with no inflation.

So when COVID started and the supply chain bottlenecks erupted, and then the war in the Ukraine occurred, suddenly we have high rates of inflation now. So this causes a very real, very serious blow to my thesis and my recommendation that the government can get away with this without causing high rates of inflation.

But if one of our more positive scenarios plays out. And the supply chain bottleneck is overcome. The war ends COVID goes away in a few years from now. We’ll probably be back in the same situation we were in 2019, where globalization is once again. So disinflationary, the inflation rate will be under control and the government then would be in a position to finance a very large scale investment program over the next decade.

And so the inflation has been quite a blow to this argument in the book, in the third part of the book. But on the other hand, the government’s policy response to the COVID pandemic has actually in some ways supported my argument. I’m calling for a multi-trillion dollar investment program in the industries and technologies of the future over the next 10 years or over a 10 year period.

In one month in April of 2020, the government borrowed 1.4 trillion in that one month alone. And during the second quarter of 2020, the government borrowed 2.8 trillion in just three months. So that’s a multi-trillion dollar stimulus program in three months, I’m calling for a multi-trillion dollar investment program over 10 years.

So just the fact that the government was able to borrow 2.8 trillion in three months with the fed financing, roughly 70% of that during the same period through money creation demonstrates how easy it would be for the government to finance a very large scale investment program now. What I’m suggesting is government finance, a large scale investment program, targeting industries like quantum computing, artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, biotech, nanotech neurosciences, renewable energies and those sorts of new technologies.

So, so like some of those, like those technologies, you discuss green energy. Now, maybe I’m a conspiracy theorist. I read too many of these things, but don’t a lot of the large companies, like big oil companies, do not want that stuff to happen. There’s some headwinds with that.

Sure. There, there are some headwinds, but. There have always been headwinds to change, so I don’t think they’re powerful enough to block these sorts of investments. Maybe they can slow them down, but you can see there’s already been a lot of innovation and growth in, in the green energy areas of the, for example the cost of solar panels is what, 90%, less than it was not too many years ago, as more investment has occurred.

And the cost of solar has come down very radically. So I don’t think that’s going to stop it. Now. The government could do this all by itself. Just like it sent a man to the moon through NASA. NASA had a lot of very positive, long term, benefits to the country and to the development of basic research and technology.

Have rained down on us in the decade since then, but perhaps a better approach would be for the government to do this in a series of a large number of joint venture companies with the private sector. So for instance, the government could select the 10,000 most promising entrepreneurs and scientists in the United States and set up joint venture companies with them, with the government, borrowing the money and funding, these companies lavishly and in exchange for financing, these joint venture companies with the private sector, the government would keep a 60% equity stake and the entrepreneurs and the scientists would keep a 40% equity stake.

And when one of these companies, the entrepreneurs would keep the 40% equity stake for managing the company. And when one of these companies. Discover a cure for cancer or kidney disease or Alzheimer’s disease, then it would be, how much would it be worth if you listed it on NASDAQ, trillions of dollars, right?

And the US taxpayers would own 60% of the company because the government has a 60% equity stake. And so this sort of investment would pay for its these companies would be so profitable, an investment on the scale that I’m discussing. And I go into great detail in this, in the book, the investment I’m discussing is so large that it would be almost certain to produce miracles.

It would induce a new technological revolution that would not only turbocharge US economic growth, but result in medical breakthroughs that would radically enhance human wellbeing. Not only in the United States, but all around the world. So that is the money revolution and the opportunities that exist through the money revolution.

Very similar to I think co the COVID vaccine was there was a JV where the US had, not only Pfizer and Moderna, but multiple companies going after the same goal. And it also reminds me of most recently, like Korea, a lot of their government backed their bigger companies.

That’s what’s fueled their growth the last couple decades. That’s right. Not only of course, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, they were all government directed through the ministry of finance in most instances. And just today, Europe is subsidizing, large scale construction of new semiconductor factories and.

China, of course is a very government directed economy with the government investing very aggressively in new industries and technologies. So there are really three reasons. I see this sort of investment program as being absolutely crucial to our future in the United States. And first as I’ve said, several times, the US needs credit growth to stay out of recession in crisis.

This sort of government borrowing and investing would ensure that we have enough credit growth to make the economy grow. But secondly, there is a real national security threat. Now from China’s investment relative to the size of their economy 22, 20 is 42% of GDP. That’s twice as high as US investment to GDP.

So China relative to GDP is investing twice as much as the us. And in terms of basic research, in terms of research and development in 19, in the year 2000, the United States invested eight times more than China did in research and development. But in 2019, China overtook the United States in research and development investment.

And if current trends continue, then by the end of this decade, China in 2030 will invest 40% more in research and development than the United States does. And if that happens, China is going to very quickly become the dominant superpower. Economically, technologically and militarily and the real threat, the biggest threat perhaps is the risk that they’re going to develop artificial intelligence before the United States does.

If the country gets to artificial general intelligence. First, the point where machines are as intelligent as humans is that after that, they’ll become exponentially more intelligent, very quickly, whoever controls artificial intelligence. First, it will be the 21st century equivalent of that country.

Having a nuclear weapons monopoly. The rest of the world will be at their mercy. And at this rate it is going to be China that gets there first. And that’s why the US needs to invest much more aggressively in these new industries and technologies just to ensure our national security. So that’s the second reason the US should invest.

But the third and the most compelling reason I believe is. It would be so easy for us to finance an investment on this scale. And it would be so certain to deliver just extraordinary breakthroughs and technological and medical miracles, and do so much to improve human wellbeing and increase job opportunities and national wealth and prosperity.

That is a moral imperative. We must do this because we can do this. And so that’s what the book is all about. It’s called the money revolution describing this, how we got to this new economic environment. We find ourselves in and the opportunities that this new economic environment opens up to us, how to finance the next American century.

That’s the subtitle. Yeah. So folks, if you support the book, if not that the Chinese are gonna check our butts, get the AI, gotta push these ideas forward. But. I would also say check out Richard’s website, Richard Duncan, economics.com. We’ll put a link. I’ve got a lot of our older interviews with you, Richard at the website, simple Passit casual.com/duncan.

So if one, if people wanna go back and see if he changed his mind with anything, which I don’t think he did, they can go back and, review this stuff, listen to some of the older interviews. And if you guys are really interested in this stuff and in a pretty efficient manner, check out his market watch subscription too. I don’t know what’s the best way of checking that out, Richard.

Yeah. So my video newsletter, which has been going for nearly nine years, is called macro watch. And what macro watch is every couple of every two weeks, I upload a new video. It’s essentially me making a PowerPoint presentation with audio describing these slides, discussing something important happening in the global economy and how that’s likely to impact asset prices, stocks, bonds, properties, currencies, commodities.

And so for example, some of the recent videos, the main themes of macro watch are that credit growth drives economic growth and liquidity determines whether asset prices go up or down. So last year, the big theme of macro watches was there. The Fed was creating 120 billion a month. And so this was creating a liquidity tsunami.

I called it that was likely to drive up asset prices. And in fact, it drove them into a frenzy, but starting around September last year, the Fed started changing its tune in letting it know that it was going to taper quantitative easing. And it turned around from being, having very loose monetary policy to very tight monetary policy.

And so at that point I started, I turned Barrish around September last year, saying liquidity tsunamis, coming to an abrupt end. And since then I’ve published probably at least 10 videos with titles, such as fear, the fed and prepare for a very hard landing that have worn that as liquidity dries up, it’s going to be a very difficult environment for asset prices and sure enough, asset prices have been crushed.

So these are the two types of videos that I produce. And so if your listeners would like to learn more, they can visit my website, which is Richard Duncan, economics.com as Richard Duncan, economics.com. And if they would like to subscribe to macro, hit the subscribe button and I’d like to offer your listeners a 50% subscription discount.

So if they hit the subscribe button, they’ll be prompted to put in a discount coupon code. If they use the coupon code lane, your name, they can subscribe to a 50% discount. So I hope they’ll check that out at Richard Duncan, economics.com and at the very least, while they’re there, they can sign up for my free blog and follow my work that way,

Line I’ve just lost your audio. I oh, there, there am. Yeah, so folks, I would say, if you’re really interested in this type of how the economy really works, I would suggest, going there and learning yes. Or at least checking out some of the free videos. There’s just so much fear mongering out there these days.

And when you start to learn how credit works and how we’re not on. Economics and how the code standard is no longer here. It really puts a lot of these headlines and more context as opposed to just taking whatever the media says. But it’s Richard, before we let you go, what’s a couple, like one or two things that you’re seeing in the headlines that from your opinion’s just, doesn’t really, it’s not more like finger mongering or things that don’t really move the needle in terms that we talked about how foreign Ukraine and the COVID impacting the supply chains.

But what are other things that you see out there that just to give people some insight on that? So one thing that really worries and bothers me about what people here in the United States, not so much on, CNN or any of the major news channels, but there’s the undercurrents people are really ha are given this idea that.

The fed is evil and the government is somehow evil and it’s all corrupt and hopeless and that the people running the fed are out to get them. And it’s like some big conspiracy. That’s just all wrong. These people are not evil. They’re not out to get you. They’re doing the best they can possibly do under the circumstances they have inherited. They’re not perfect, but they’re certainly not trying to crush the middle class or, in any way, harm anyone.

So this entire negative view that is shared by such a large number of Americans now is really very damaging. And I’m sure that sort of message is being fueled by our enemies being sponsored by China and Russia. A lot of these websites who perpetually send out messages to the US are failing. And, the dollar is going to collapse and become worthless and you can’t trust anyone, that’s completely wrong.

The United States is a democracy and it is, it has the rule of law and it remains, the best hope I think for, or given its size the best hope for the future of humanity. And we don’t want a totalitarian government, like China has where if you, you can criticize the government in the us.

You criticize the government in China and you disappear. You criticize the government in Russia, you disappear. We don’t, we’ve got a much better system. Now, sometimes these totalitarian governments, like China, can be very effective because they can just steamroll over all opposition. But if they’re the president who now appears to be president for life.

Now, if he becomes senile 10 years from now, the way dun the way mal became senile in his later years, that was catastrophic for China. We’ve got a great political system in the United States. It’s not perfect. Us. Foreign policy has certainly not been perfect, but is better than the alternatives.

And it’s wrong to think that our system is badly falling apart. Crumbling, not too long ago, people were arguing that the dollar was about to collapse. Now the dollar’s at a 20 year high and so you know, have faith in your government and have faith in people at the fed. And us policy makers, because they’re certainly trying to do the best for our country, given the situation that they have inherited, which poses a lot of challenges and problems, but they’re trying to do their best.

So don’t don’t assume the worst about American policy makers, because this is our country and we need to make it stronger. Not tear it apart. Thanks. I, and I think I agree with that positive sentiment at the end, a little, it always fun is it’s always fun to talk bad about the government, but I do agree with you on that one, Richard, but yeah, if you guys wanna form your own opinions about this stuff, check out macro watch if not just steal what you get from Yahoo finance, we’ll see you guys next time.

What was the last couple of podcasts that was really like Richard Duncan. And it really
puts a lot of faith in the fed, like how he was closing out there. It’s a hard job, right? Like these guys in the Fed, they’re running this intricate balance of managing inflation to two to 3% while manipulating inflation one way with unemployment and interest rates.

And it’s a fine balance without this thing toppling down and staying in the middle. Now, there was one thing that he mentioned that I took exception to, which was with a lot of millennials out there finally having to pay their interests on their. Now you’ve mentioned that.

Yeah, like a lot of ’em aren’t gonna be buying houses to live in, which makes me, as an apartment owner, it’s good residential home prices that I don’t invest in residential properties for that reason because it is very emotional and to me, less and less people are gonna be buying houses. The one thing I did during the session that he said was lowering rents. I don’t think rents will be going down for any long period of time. And I’ve said it before. It can go down for maybe a few quarters in a row, but I find it hard to believe that it’ll go down for more than a year, three years more than that.

Rent is just one of those things. That’s just as things get more and more expensive, it gets passed on to the poor consumer at the bottom. And as things get more, more difficult, millennials have problems qualifying for debt buying houses to live in because they become more and more unaffordable. What do they do? We got vacancies. They can come up and rent the apartment if they want. And that’s why I essentially like to invest in commodities that cater towards the lower middle class, that kind of catch people as they come.

So if you haven’t yet make sure you guys check out some of our future events. We’re gonna be doing a couple here and the January retreat in Hawaii. Martin Luther king weekend. Join our club to get access to more details simplepassivecashflow.com/club, and we will see you on next week’s podcast.

U.S. Economy: Foundation of Today’s Crisis | Podcast With Richard Duncan Part 1

Hey, simple passive cash listeners today is going to be a foundational podcast for a lot of you folks. We’ve with a repeat guest, Richard Duncan who wrote four books, analyzing the causes and the effects of the economic crisis. Now we’ve had him on the podcast in the back, but I brought Richard back and the way we’re gonna run this today is we’re gonna split this up into a couple of podcasts.

So this first podcast you guys are gonna be hearing is a little bit more evergreen. It’s a lot of his understanding and a lot of the stuff I’ve adopted in my understanding of the economy. And I think it’s gonna be very important for a lot of you guys, maybe replay this podcast again and.

There’s just a very different thought process and like how sophisticated people see different news articles in the media talking about the economy and how things really work today stay tuned and the second half or the next podcast, we’re gonna be talking a little bit more timely, current events.

What I say is learn the foundations that we’re gonna be talking about here today, because whatever happens in the world last time we talked to Richard, it was 2019, and I’m sure we were talking about the Koreans bombing Hawaii at that time or something.

I think that was the black Swan event at the time today in Ukraine, but whatever it is in the future by knowing these fundamental ideas, I think it gives you a better way to take everything in and not just be paralyzed and take into the fear mongering of the news media.

Thanks for jumping on Richard. I appreciate it. Lane, thanks for having me back. It’s a pleasure to be here. Yeah. So for people who are not familiar with Richard he runs a paid newsletter called market watch, which I subscribe to along with a lot of the other founding office members in our community.

And, he’ll come up with a, it is about a video a week, or no, every yeah, every month, I think you come up with a new one and a lot of it’s very timely, but a lot of it is more foundational. So we’re gonna be just, hitting the tip of the iceberg today. Let’s get started Richard.

For a lot of the investors, they’re new to how the economy works, how the fed works. Where should we start out first. The most important thing I think for everyone to begin with to understand is that the economy no longer works the way it did in the past.

The big break came when the United States stopped backing dollars with gold. That happened between 1968 and 1971. And afterwards our economic system evolved in a very different way. So the economic theory that everyone is still taught in university, all of the classical economic theory that was developed in the 19th century and before that was all based on the initial foundation stone, the initial premise that gold was money.

And it was all built on that foundation stone gold was money and therefore the economy had to work in a certain way because the gold was money, but after gold stopped being money in 1968, then things started to evolve. And now our economic system works in a very different way than it did before. And so it requires a different kind of economic theory to understand the way it works.

Because after all, I think everyone’s pretty convinced now that the old theory just can’t explain the way things work in the modern world. That’s why there’s been so much confusion about what’s going on in the economy for the last several decades. So let me explain in a little bit more detail. Up until 1968 the US central bank was required to own gold.

To issue to back up all the dollars it issued. That’s the way it had been since the Fed was created in 1913, but by 1968, the Fed didn’t have enough gold left to allow it to issue any more dollars. So this was a huge problem because if the money supply couldn’t grow, the economy would have a crisis.

So Congress changed the law and they removed that requirement for the Fed to hold any gold backing for the dollar whatsoever. That happened in 1968. And then just a few years later, Richard Nixon destroyed the Brett and woods system because that was based on allowing other countries to convert their dollars into US gold.

But by 1971, the US just didn’t have enough gold left to allow other countries to convert all of their dollars into US gold. We would’ve completely had no gold left whatsoever had that occurred. So Nixon renewed that promise for the US to allow other countries to convert his dollars into gold.

And so afterwards there was no longer a link in Melink whatsoever between dollars or money and gold. And afterwards the economic system started to evolve in ways that no one had anticipated or planned on. It just evolved naturally once these gold golden feathers were removed, things started to change most obviously.

The one thing that changed was the Fed was suddenly free to create as much money as it wanted, as long as it didn’t create high rates of inflation. So the next thing that changed was because the fed was free to create a lot of money. This enabled the US government to run larger budget deficits than it could be before without pushing up interest rates.

In the olden days, since there was only a limited amount of money, if the government had very large budget deficits, then it would’ve had to borrow a lot of money. And there was only a fixed amount of money. So the government borrowing would push up interest rates and that would, they say, crowd out the private sector because the higher interest rates made a lot of investments unprofitable, and that was bad for the economy.

But once the Fed was freed to create a bunch of money, as it pleased, it enabled the government to have larger budget deficits because the Fed created money and bought a lot of this government debt and financed the government budget deficits at low interest rates. So more that allowed more fiscal stimulus and that allowed the government to direct the economy more by having larger budget deficits and spending more.

Now the next, very important thing that changed after dollars ceased to be backed by. Was the trade between countries no longer balanced? It seems odd to think that before 1971 trade between countries was balanced, we had such enormous US governments and such enormous US trade deficits. Now, for instance, this year, the US trade deficit is going to be something like 1 trillion.

And we’ve all grown up in this world over the last three or four decades where the US has run these extraordinarily large trade deficits. But before 1971, that just didn’t happen. Trade was in balance. And the reason it was in balance was because, for example, if the US had a big trade deficit, let’s say with China, as it does today, it would’ve had to send its gold over to China to pay for the trade deficit.

And so US gold, which was money. The money supply would’ve contracted, and that would’ve caused a very severe recession in the United States. So unemployment would’ve gone up and there would’ve been deflation. And pretty soon, the Americans wouldn’t have enough gold left to allow it to continue buying things from China or any other country.

So trade had to come back into balance. There was an automatic adjustment mechanism under the bread and wood system. And before that, under the gold standard that made sure that trade between countries had to balance, because if it didn’t balance, you had to pay for your deficit with gold and gold was money.

You’d run out of money. And so you’d stop having a trade deficit was very simple, but once gold was no longer money, it didn’t take the United States very long to discover that it could start running very large trade deficits with other countries and it no longer had to pay with gold. It could just pay with paper dollars or treasury bonds denominated in paper dollars.

And there was no limit as to how many of these the US government could create. So starting in the early 1980s, the US started having a very big trade deficit for the first time ever. And by the middle of the 1980s, it was equal to 3.5% of GDP. That was just something entirely unprecedented, unimaginable.

But that was just the beginning in 1990, around 1990, China entered the global economy. And so the US started having larger and larger trade deficits with China. And by 2006, the US trade deficit was 800 billion in that one year alone. That was 6% of US GDP. Now, of course, this was fantastic for global economic growth.

Because with the US having an $800 billion trade deficit in that one year, that meant the rest of the world could have an $800 billion trade surplus. In other words, it could, the rest of the world could produce $800 billion worth of goods, more than it would’ve otherwise been able to do and sell it all to the United States.

And so this was a thing that, you could say, was globalization as the US trade deficit exploded between 1980 in 2006. This globalization, this huge US trade deficit created a global economic boom that allowed one country after another, around the world to grow through export led growth.

This had really started a bit earlier after world war II with Japan and being able to industrialize by selling a lot of goods to the United States and then Korea and then Taiwan. Then later Thailand and Indonesia, Malaysia, and more recently Vietnam and China. So in particular, all of Asia has been able to industrialize largely because it’s been able to make manufactured goods and sell them to the United States.

So this was great for the developing countries in Asia. It, in fact, pooled hundreds of millions of people around the world out of poverty. But from the US perspective, why this was so important is because when the US started buying more and more goods from low wage countries like Thailand and Indonesia and later China and Vietnam.

This by buying goods from low wage countries, this pushed down the cost of manufactured goods in the United States. It was disinflationary. It drove down the inflation rate and it also drove down wages in the US or held wages down. And so this is the reason that the inflation rate came down so sharply from the early 1980s up until very recently, globalization was extremely deflationary and it kept the inflation rate very low and that allowed interest rates in the US to go to very low levels.

So for example, because the inflation was so low, that meant that the interest rates could be very low. Between the year 2000 and the time when COVID started roughly a 20 year period, the average rate of inflation in the United States was 1.7% in that 20 year period. So that was below the Fed’s 2% inflation target for two decades.

So the Fed’s biggest worry was preventing deflation during those decades, rather than worrying about inflation. So the reason this is so important is because back say in the 1960s and 1970s before, while trade was still in balance, if the us government ran very large budget deficits and over stimulated the economy, and if the fed created a lot of money to help finance those trade deficits, then that always led the very high rates of inflation.

And the reason that led to very high rates of inflation is because all of that government spending and stimulus and money creation, would’ve created such a strong economic growth in the United States that everyone would have a job. And also all of the factories would be working at full industrial capacity.

The car factories would be working flat out. The steel factories would be manufacturing all the steel that it could possibly manufacture. And so we hit domestic bottlenecks, and these domestic bottlenecks resulted in prices moving up, both wages and the cost of manufactured goods. And this led to a wage push inflation spiral that we experienced throughout the 1970s.

So then everything changed though in the 1980s, because we started running these very big trade deficits with the rest of the world and they were very deflationary. So the deflationary forces from globalization completely offset all of the inflationary forces that were being caused by the very large government budget deficits and all of the paper money that was being created by the fed.

And we still ended up in a situation where. The inflation rate was lower than the fed wanted. And interest rates were very low and the very low interest rates, then there were two results from low interest rates. One credit expanded very rapidly, and the credit growth started to drive economic growth.

And also the low interest rates meant that asset prices inflated when interest rates moved down, asset prices like property and also stocks and all the asset classes tend to move up. So our economic system started, it evolved over these past many decades after dollars ceased to be backed by gold. And we moved into an economic system where credit growth became the most important driver of economic growth.

This was something quite so Richard, let me, before we move to creditism, yeah, so check my understanding here of Globalization like globalization is like a disruptor in a way. The way I see it, to use it in a modern day analogy, it’s like the apple M one ship.

It’s like a disruptor technology. It runs cooler. It’s a lot quicker. This apple, silicone, I don’t know all the things, but like for the time being it’s a total game changer and that’s what globalization was. It was the ability to get cheaper labor elsewhere. And that helped both sides of the equation, which is why India and China the, they came up in terms of network or worth, and America was able to outsource a lot of these jobs.

But in a way, is it like the apple, one ship getting old, five years, 10 years in the future? Is that kind of what’s going on with globalization? It’s been around for a while. You’re right. So globalization really produced a paradigm shift. And I’ve written about this in my new book, which is called the money revolution.

So what I’ve been describing so far since we’ve been talking is this money revolution that has occurred since dollars used to be backed by gold. The catalyst for the revolution was when the US stopped backing dollars with gold. And now what we’re experiencing is a partial reversal of globalization.

And this has occurred over the last couple of years first because COVID resulted in global supply chain bottlenecks. And more recently Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has worsened the global supply chain bottleneck. And this has caused inflation to spike. So for all of this time, from the early 1980s, inflation moved lower and lower until COVID hit.

And then once COVID hit well at first prices actually fell for a while when everyone was locked down. But soon after that, because of the government stimulus and the supply chain bottlenecks. Now we’re experiencing very high rates of inflation and this is a, so this has been a double blow to globalization that has represented a partial reversal of this paradigm shift that we’ve lived through as a result of globalization and the higher inflation rate poses, a very dire threat to not only economic growth, but wealth as we’ve already seen.

A great deal of wealth has been destroyed. This year stock prices have fallen and cryptos have crumbled and other risky asset prices have crashed. That’s because the reversal of globalization has driven up the inflation rate and that’s forced the Fed to tighten monetary policy very aggressively or begin to tighten it policy very aggressively with much more tightening to come.

Yeah, so that it’s not so much, globalization is getting old. It’s just that globalization has dealt various severe blows and it’s reeling. It is on its back feet. And it’s not certain how long we’re going to suffer this reversal to globalization. We’d like to think that COVID is going to come to an end sometime soon, but we can’t be certain about that.

In fact, the headlines just today are that, COVID, once again, is spreading around China. China has a zero COVID policy. So they’re shutting down their factories again and imposing new lockdowns. And so this winter, we may have an even worse variant of COVID than we’ve had thus far.

We just don’t know how long COVID is going to last and how long it’s going to continue disrupting its supply chains and how long it’s going to continue to hammer globalization. And likewise, we don’t know how long the war in Ukraine is going to go on. Hopefully it will end tomorrow. But on the other hand, in a worst case scenario, it could spread to other countries in Europe or even become a world war.

So we just don’t know how this is going to play out. And that’s what makes it so frightening today for investors and for economists and analysts trying to forecast what’s going to happen with stock prices and other asset prices. And the outlook for the economy is very uncertain. Yeah. Those two headwinds, you just mentioned one would assume that it would go away in the next decade, let’s just to have there’s some point where it, the impact ends, but globalization, to me, I feel still feel like there’s that’s still gonna keep ticking for a lot, much longer than that. Maybe even several more decades, like how, we said at one time the United States has no more oil fossil fuel, but apparently there’s a boatload of it, right?

That’s right. If COVID goes away, I believe it will. Not that I’m qualified to discuss that, but I hope that war will end sometime soon and not become World War II. Those, it probably will. COVID probably will go away. The war probably will end and things probably will go back the way they were in 2019.

For example, the last time we spoke. And if that occurs, then we’ll be back in this world where globalization is exerting very strong, downward pressure on us prices. And we’ll, it probably won’t take very long to get back to the point where inflation in the US is once again, below the Fed’s 2% inflation target.

And if we move back in that position, that is ideal because it allows the government to manage the economy pretty effectively through large budget deficits when necessary and through quantitative easing with the Fed, creating money and buying government bonds to help finance the government spending at low interest rates.

And of course the low interest rate, environment’s very positive for asset prices. So hopefully we will return there before too many more years have passed. Let’s back up cuz I, some people, so we don’t leave anybody behind here. Some people slow down to absorb a lot of this, which is makes a lot of sense to me as you go over this and this is what a lot, a lot of this content is actually taught through, a large module in Richard’s market watch content on his website, but maybe probably go to creditism and quantitative, easing, quantitative, I think people hear about it, but maybe not all together.

They hear it spoken about in the news here or there, Okay. So again, once dollars cease to be backed by gold, our economic system evolved and it evolved into a system that requires credit growth. Our economic system, our economy became dependent on credit growth. For example, going back to 1952, every time total credit in the US grew by less than 2% adjusted for inflation.

The US went into recession and the recession didn’t end until there was another very big surge of credit expansion. So that tells us that the US economy requires at least 2% credit growth adjusted for inflation to stay out of recession. That happened nine times between 1952 and 2009. And every time that credit grew by less than 2%, there was a recession.

Now let me add this total credit has accelerated so radically during my lifetime, what I mean by total credit? Total credit is the same thing as total debt. Because one person’s debt is another person’s asset. A credit that they’ve extended is debt to someone else. So you can look at this as all the debt in the country, not just the government debt, but the household’s debt, the corporation’s debt, the financial sector’s debt, all the debt in the country.

First went through 1 trillion in 1964, by 2007, just on the Eve of the financial crisis. It has expanded to more than 50 trillion. So that was a 50 fold expansion of credit in just 43 years. And now total credit is 90 trillion. So 90 trillion of credit expansion in just 52 years and credit growth became the main driver of economic growth.

As I’ve said, anytime credit grew by less than 2%, the US went into recession. Then, the crisis of 2008 occurred because the private sector had taken on so much debt. The households in particular had taken on so much debt that they couldn’t repay it. They couldn’t continue paying interest on their mortgages.

And so they started defaulting and the private sector started defaulting and the banks started to fail, but the government intervened very aggressively with multi-trillion dollar budget deficits, and the Fed helped finance those budget deficits with money creation. So between 2008 and 2014, the US government dead increased by 7 trillion.

And the Fed created three and a half trillion dollars through quantitative easing. To finance that government debt at low interest rates and the combination of government fiscal stimulus and money creation by the Fed prevented a new, great depression. It reflected the global bubble that started to pop in 2008 and it carried on, it carried us on up until 2020 when COVID started.

So I described this news, the way the economy works now is driven by credit growth. So rather than calling this capitalism. I call it creditism. Capitalism was an economic system that was driven this way. Businessmen would invest. Some of them would make a profit. They would save their profits. Or in other words, accumulate capital, hence capitalism and repeat.

So it was driven by investment and saving and then more investment and more in saving. And that’s what drove economic growth under capitalism, but in recent decades, that’s not the way our economic system works at all anymore. The growth driver for our economic system for decades now has been credit growth and consumption and more credit growth and more consumption.

So our economy has become dependent on credit growth. And as long as credit keeps expanding, everything’s fine. But when credit slows down and grows by less than 2% adjusted for inflation, we have a recession. And if credit starts to contract, as it almost did in 2008, then we would go into a great depression.

The government understands this and it now manages the economy as best it can to make sure that credit keeps expanding one way or the other. So after 2008, the private sector really couldn’t take on a great deal of additional credit. So the government had to drive the economy by borrowing and spending, and even with the government borrowing and spending on a multi trillion dollar scale.

For the first four years after 2008, that still wasn’t enough to make credit grow a lot more. It wasn’t enough to get credit growing by 3%. In other words, adjusted for inflation. It was even with all the government stimulus and the government debt credit growth was still weak. It was just barely above the 2% recession threshold as I call it.

So the Fed stepped in and through very low interest rates and round after round of quantitative easing, the Fed drove up asset prices and this created a wealth effect. The wealth increased and that allowed the Americans to consume more. And this, so this wealth effect engineered by the Fed supplemented the weak credit growth and allowed the economy to keep expanding.

So from between 2009, the end of last year, total wealth in the United States expanded by 150%. Total wealth grew by 90 trillion in those 13 years from 60 trillion in 2009 to 150 trillion at the end of last year, 150% increase in household sector wealth in the us. And of course the creation of 90 trillion of wealth was very helpful in making the economy continue to grow.

It allowed people to spend more money, more consumption, and consumption’s 70% of GDPs. So that helped fuel the US economy and that made the economy grow. But the problem was that the wealth, the asset prices were moving up much more rapidly than income. So the asset prices became extremely inflated.

There’s a very good measure, a good index that I look at called. I call it the wealth to income ratio. And when the wealth to income ratio goes very high, that tells you that asset prices are too expensive and they’re likely to correct. So what this wealth income ratio actually is the household sector net worth, which I was just talking about.

Household sector, net worth, hit 150 trillion at the end of last year. This household sector net worth is divided by personal disposable income. So it’s wealth to income. Now, the average for this ratio, going back to 1950, this wealth income ratio has averaged. 550% since 1950. But during the NASDAQ bubble, it hit a record high of 620% because the NASDAQ stocks were so expensive and that bubble popped, and it went back to its average of 550%.

Then during the property bubble, the wealth income ratio shot up to a new record, high of six hundred and six hundred 70%. And then the property bubble popped in 2008. And this wealth income ratio went back to its average 550%. But by the end of last year, because of this extraordinary frenzy, in all of the asset markets, the wealth income ratio went up to 820%.

That was 23% and above its previous all time high at the peak of the property bubble. This was telling us that asset prices were extremely stretched. And very vulnerable to anything that could go wrong. And the thing that went wrong is inflation went up and the Fed had to start tightening barriers aggressively.

And so now we’ve had the first half of this year has been the worst year for stocks going back to what the 1960s and in the second quarter in particular was particularly harsh. So we’ve seen NASDAQ down more than 30%. The S and P’s have been down more than 20%, two thirds of all the value of crypto has been destroyed and other expensive asset prices are crashing as well.

But even after this, the wealth to income ratio based on my calculations is still 730%. So it’s still. 10% above its previous, all time peak in, at the peak of the property bubble. So this is telling us that asset prices are still very expensive and potentially have a lot more downside to go. For instance, if the wealth income ratio were to fall back to its 50 year average of 550%, a total of 50 trillion of wealth would have to be destroyed between the end of last year.

And by the time we hit the average at the end of last year, total wealth in the US was $150 trillion. It’s now down because the sell off in the stock market is now probably about 135 trillion. But to return to its average, it would have to fall to 100 and $100 trillion. And that suggests that up to another $35 trillion of wealth could be destroyed.

Before we return to the average. Now it’s not certain that we are going to return to the average, but much of that is going to depend on how high the Fed increases interest rates and how much money the Fed destroys through quantitative tightening, which just started last month. Yeah. I think that’s a kind of a fascinating ratio right there.

How, but I’m thinking that there’s a wealth gap, right? Part of that is taking in the average consumer out there, which is getting worse and worse than the top 1% or 0.1%. How does that factor in wouldn’t there be even wouldn’t their percentage getting less and less over time if that’s the case, that’s the overall trend?

You’re right. The income inequality has become very much worse and over the last few years, but over the last couple of decades as well, if a lot of wealth is destroyed, a lot of that wealth will be wealth belonging to people who have more than a billion dollars, but at the same time, if we see, so if that’s the case, then you know, it might not be so terrible because someone who has $15 billion, it’s probably not going to spend a lot less money than when he had 20 billion.

He’s still going to keep spending a lot of money, but whereas someone who’s at the bottom of the income distribution spectrum, if they lose a little wealth, they would have to probably spend much less money. But now of course, a lot of Americans own stocks and a lot of Americans own crypto as well recently.

And with stock prices down so far already, these people are probably going to feel less wealthy. They’re probably going to cut back on their spending. Of course, all of the government stimulus over the last few years has helped boost savings and has enabled the American public broadly to spend more money.

But of course, those stimulus programs are over. Now. The first one was in March, 2020, the second one was December, 2020. And the third one was in March, 2021. That was 15 months ago, so that there aren’t going to be any more big stimulus packages. So that source of consumer spending is going to dry it very quickly as well, that, combined with the big losses in their 401k plans.

And once they realize how much money they’ve lost in the stock market this year, that’s likely to deter them from spending as much. So it’s going to be a real drag on the economy and soon property prices are also likely to begin to fall. As interest rates keep moving higher. Of course the property markets enjoyed a wonderful run.

I think it’s up to something like a third. Property prices on average home prices are up something like a third over the last two years, and they’re still going higher on a year on year basis, but that’s likely to reverse before long. The Fed has just now started tightening interest rates and they’re going to keep tightening rates.

They increased the federal funds rate by 75 basis points last month. And they’re expected to increase another 75 basis points at the end of this month. And they’re likely to keep increasing the federal funds rate every time they meet through the middle of next year. So it’s not the federal funds rate now; it’s roughly in a range between 1.5% and 1.75%.

But by the middle of next year, it could move up to four and a half percent. And if it does, then the 10 year government bond yield is going to be at least four and a half percent and mortgage rates are going to be significantly higher than that. And so property prices are likely to begin falling and a lot.

And of course, most Americans are nearly most of all the Americans own their own homes or the majority at least. And so if they start feeling that their home prices are following, this is also going to curb their consumption, right? And with the fed increasing, the fed inflation rate now has shot up to 8.6%.

These are CPI headline numbers. The core numbers are lower, but they’re still well above the Fed’s 2% inflation target. So the Fed’s going to have to keep hiking the federal funds rate and pushing interest rates higher. The Fed’s mandate is stable prices and maximum employment. While employment’s extremely low, 3.6%, the Fed’s going to have to concentrate on bringing down the inflation rate.

Now, inflation is driven by supply and demand. If there’s too much demand and too little supply, then you get rising in prices. And the fed can’t do anything on the supply side, the fed can’t go out and drill more oil Wells or plant more wheat. They only can operate on the demand side. And so, what that means is they have to make demand go lower.

If they’re going to bring the inflation rate down. And the only way they can bring the demand side lower is by increasing interest rates so far that they throw millions of Americans out of work, and also destroy a lot of wealth by making the stock market and the property market fall. And by that makes demand lower by making demand lower, that makes inflation lower and so that’s what they’re intending to do now. They’re intending to drive up the unemployment rate, they’re intending to destroy wealth so that the inflation rate comes back down.

July 2022 Real Estate Braddahs Ep. 53

Hey folks, this is the 53rd episode of the real estate brothers. Welcome folks. In this episode, we’re gonna be talking all about rising interest rates, J Powell and rumors of the fed. And Dean’s gonna start us off with some June statistics, but before we do that, why don’t you guys take some time and take some questions and comments and we’ll, I’ll try and formulate it in our head.

We’ll try, incorporate it into this month’s episode. Okay, so that is that me? That’s you. Okay. Welcome everybody. Thank you for tuning in as always. What is this number? 53 episode number. That’s pretty cool. I think it shows our dedication to our craft. We’re not doing anything else other than doing this freaking thing every month. We should be in person soon.

Is that right? So as you guys know, I’m a real estate investor and realtor in Hawaii can catch me on my YouTube website real estate of Hawaii, or my website, real estate of Hawaii dot. But yeah. Before we jumped into the statistics, I wanted to share a couple things, summer activities here in Hawaii.

So one event that I tried, our venue was beyond Monet. That’s over in the convention center. I, the reason why I posted, I wanna talk about this one is that I wasn’t very cool. I guess you could say, but I wasn’t impressed very much and maybe I’m not an impressionist appreciator or an art appreciator, but it just was, the lack of, what I was able to see there, basically there was like two large rooms.

One room had a lot of. Words that you could read about Monique’s history, which that part was interesting, but keep in mind, I brought my 10 and my eight year old child and they went, we went on a playdate. So that was one room that after you read all the history, then you step into another room that had, it was like a big, I know it is just an empty hall that had four sides of Screens and the projectors just shot on all four sides.

Like just moving art, which is interesting too, but that was pretty much the end of it. And I think we paid, along the lines of maybe $30. So it went by really quickly. So just underneath that, I have this search for Snoopy the peanuts adventure at the experience. We didn’t do this, but the funny thing is after the beyond, Monnet.

event. We went over to AWA shopping center and to have the kids play on this playground right next to the target. And we saw this search for Snoopy, a popup adventure. So I, we didn’t go to, we didn’t have time, but I then went online, came to find out it’s the, it’s pretty much the same price as the BI money event.

And again, I haven’t gone through it yet, but it touted like eight different things. Areas to go and do, tour and adventure. So it depends like I’m sure if you’re a Mon fan or appreciated the beyond money must would probably be awesome. But, I didn’t find it very. Good bang for your buck.

And the one interesting thing too, was that someone was working, there was a basketball tournament down below at the convention center. So I was talking to the lady working that event. And she has mentioned to me that she was gonna go to beyond Mon and said, oh, And I asked her, there was a beyond van go event that happened probably six months ago.

So I had asked her, oh, what she thought about that one? She said she hadn’t been to that one. She missed it. But the interesting comment she made was that the beyond van go event had a lot, a really good turnout. And from my understanding, it was very similar with the two different areas.

And she said, surprisingly, she finds that this beyond Monet venue, isn’t getting as nearly as much attraction or pool as the beyond van goal came. So that made me think that people like that. Paid the money for the Vango event. Weren’t impressed enough to come back to the beyond money when they found out it was a very similar concept instead. Anyway, did you go to the one in Japan where there’s like

the immersive experience near you? Yes. So that one there’s two of those in Tokyo and we did go to that and oh yeah, maybe I’m comparing it to that, but. When blue this one’s out of water, because this one, I’m just looking at a picture, but it looks like they just like. Fired up four or four projectors and they just changed the USB file.

It’s not, I, there are transitions a little bit. It’s a little bit more fancy than that to your point. But yeah, in a nutshell versus the one in Japan, which is, comparing apples in oranges, but the technology that they had in the one in is, the kids, they would get a picture.

They would. Draw a sea creature, and then they would scan that sea creature in the computer, and then that would pop up and be animated. And. Going all over the walls in the virtual ocean and it would be moving. And that’s just one right there. There’s and maybe we were expecting that, but anyway, we are typical Hawaii, man.

If anybody can help me find a CPA that knows about passive losses and land conservation essence, please help me because apparently we are 20 years behind everybody on the mainland. And in terms of 3d, immersive art, we. A hundred years behind Japan. Anyway, getting off topic, let’s jump into the statistics for June.

And I’ve been tracking this as well as some other statistics because everyone is talking about the doom and glue and how there’s the correction and interest rates are making everything. Tank. And that may be the case on the stock market side, but glad to announce that it’s not quite happening in Hawaii. We are seeing a little bit of, I dunno, if you wanna call it softness, but as you can see, it’s not really evident in some of these numbers I’ll point out to you where it might be, but starting off with the single family meeting, single family home prices, we’re actually at 1 million we’re actually up 12% from the same time last year.

On the townhouse condo side, we actually. Broken all time, new record at five 30, 4,000. And that’s up 16% from last year where we do see maybe a potential. I dunno if you wanna call it softening, but it is on the Kohl sales, 357 for single family. That’s a 21% decrease from last year and 626 Kohl sales for townhouse condos.

That’s a 14% decrease. Last year, if you wanna say, that’s, if that’s a sign, the market, we’re still at 10 and 11% market, which is still a strong seller’s market by definition. So what I would like to do is like how we always do is dig a little bit further to see how things are going.

So closed sales. We see again, we’re just looking at the trend lines that, over the last. In 10 years, this is the closed sale trend. And if you look at it still looks relatively healthy, it’s not like it’s like a big drop, for new listings. This is where I think on the mainland.

Certain parts of the mainland they’re saying is softening up because sales are going down, listings are coming up. And then, inventory overall is on the rise, which is causing the prices then to soften. But as you can see here, new listings, we have, we, it’s not really going up. It’s actually going down.

And so what that does. Month supply of inventory. It’s not bumping that up as much as it is in certain parts of the United States. So if we look at, for June, we still have a single family, 1.6 months of inventory and condos, one not much different at 1.7, if you look at this historical chart, we were still really busy all time low still.

Until the inventory starts bumping up, I think that’s. We will actually get to see more softening of the prices I think. And, one thing different we have is our new construction rates. Aren’t nearly as high as they are at the mainland, being on the island as we are. So looking at days on market too, as a lagging indicator for a buyers or sellers market.

And we have, as you can see. As you mentioned earlier, it’s well under two weeks, so we’re still by definition in a seller’s market. And again, all of these statistics are lagging indicators, but these are six days old, right? As of June, interest rates again we talked about in the past.

I pulled this number yesterday, but the 30 year fixed is at 5.65. And I know I hear a lot of people freaking out and right, because everyone’s been spoiled for the last 10, 12 years. And what it does is yeah. When you, everyone is used to that 3% interest rate, it’s going. Almost double and now your buying power goes down.

So everyone has to adjust to that. Yeah. Okay. So now going onto some interesting news on the west side of wahoo, this is regarding the Makaha valley area. Once in a while, I get these calls . A lot of people like new construction and they’re looking for new construction popping up.

We always talk about Kaka ACO. We talk about Co Ridge having a whole ley, but there’s one small subdivision out in Makaha valley by cottage, by Stanford, Cara cottages at Mount Olu. It’s a gated community. The single family homes up to about 1.2 million and it is just out there in the middle of that valley and just stands out compared to everything else.

And part of the reason why is because we had this, a Canadian company that had bought the land in Makaha valley many years ago. And they were supposed to develop residential vacation homes, vacation rentals and golf courses. A few golf courses, I think two golf courses popped up over there.

Only one has survived, but besides that, there’s not much out there. In fact, one of the golf courses was supposed to be a tiger woods golf course. And so without that development coming through fruition that cottages of mono oil just stood out there. Oddly placed, but that developer actually went bankrupt in 2021, the one in Canada.

And so they, the bankruptcy courts have sold the property to K group, which is a Korean company. And hopefully they’re gonna start development in terms of getting that Makaha valley, developed in, having. Some neighbors and something to match the development of the cottages at MLU.

So that’s it depends how you look at some, some people think that’s great news. Other people are like, keep the, keep Hawaii, but is that a safe place out there? Is it. I just ask the question, everybody’s thinking. Yeah, no, and that’s a great question. And as a realtor, by, by definition, they, we have to watch out for what we say because of fair housing laws.

So when oh, selling properties, that kind of thing, but no, to your point, you go down the street. And you head towards the ocean and there’s a homeless camp off to the right, right on the beach. That’s not looking too good. And overall, you think of the, once you get outta Makaha valley, you look at the.

The condition in the neighborhood, the houses are really old. And so there is something to say it was gated, right? This thing, this, the cottage at mano is gated. Yeah. And there’s a guard. Like I said, it does, it is unique in terms of once you get out of the valley how the rest of the inventory and those new neighborhoods.

This is good for the mainland guys who don’t know anything about the island. And then they just, they don’t care being on the west side. Funny that you bring that up because that’s who’s the ones that are spotting this one and asking me about it. So yeah, that’s exactly the ones. And then, so then there’s a little bit of education too, and saying, okay come down and let’s go drive through the neighborhood. Let’s take a drive out. and let me know what you think. And so it is to your point that I am getting those inquiries about cottages. That’s why, when I see these articles like, oh, good to talk about because it’s all part of educating our friends, our clients, about our neighborhoods, where are the gated communities?

You get this one there’s. There’s actually a if you could see this picture out. Oh, lower Ridge. Oh, just in general. Yeah. There’s not many gay communities. Yeah. There, oh, there’s a townhouse in Milani Maka. There’s condo complexes that are easier to gate, right?

Yeah. But no houses. Yeah. You know what I mean? Yeah. Oh, there, there are ones I. Shoot. I think in Windward side, there are too. And in the Kahala side, there are a few, I think they’re small though. Yeah. But yeah. That’s why I like to talk about these kind of, articles too. Yeah. As always, I like to talk about the scam the month.

So now we’re talking about celebrity cryptocurrency scams and. Basically what these scammers are doing is they’re building the scam initially. Then the criminals will boost the scam with fake endorsements. So they will get, I guess they’ll impersonate public figures who previously promoted cryptocurrency to make the endorsements seem legitimate.

And then the endorsements are meant to influence you to invest in the scam. And if you fall further you’ll not see any return on your investment, obviously. So keep being aware of those. Always do you know, never trust a get rich quick scheme, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

They’re the crypto currency scams are usually caught, and shut down quickly, but you never know. And remember that celebrities do get paid to endorse the. Cryptocurrency. You do your research and your due diligence in mighty people, although we are social creatures and we just follow, like lemmings one person that’s popular, right.

Happens since high. So that’s basically what this is. Yeah. So in this scenario, that celebrity isn’t truly promoting this scam, it’s just try to mimic that. Yeah. So the way this works is there’s like these discord channels. And then they’re usually put on by some kind of influencer, like a YouTuber or somebody like a podcaster that doesn’t know what they’re talking about.

But sometimes the influencer is like some actual tech founder that actually went full cycle with a company that’s where you gotta do due diligence, but most times it’s think, what’s that Jake Paul dude, or I don’t know who these guys are, that the one the brothers, the box. The pro boxer.

I don’t know. He, I don’t know. He’s got beach chairs like that, but he’s, there’s a lot of these like influencers, right? And so they get paid, not they’re dumb. They, I would, if I was the influencer, I would want equity, but they just get paid like a, just a quick sum of cash to shout out.

Just like all the Instagram influences out there. If you guys go to social blade.com, you can. Find all the local influencers and just pay people in certain categories where you want. It’s all paid for. It’s just a sham these days.

Like social media, waste of time. I dunno. I’ve been grumpy today. Cool, cool. No, that’s a good, very good point in terms of, you get. You very much do research, cuz there’s so many people and you think that it’s legit, they try to legitimize things. Anyway, moving on. So I have a client who is, this has happened a few times actually, where. . But right now I have a client who’s planning to sell their property.

They live 3000 miles away. They haven’t seen their property for quite a few years now it was tenanted. And again so yeah, they’re in the mainland and One thing and sorry they want me to sell their property. So one thing I asked them to consider you don’t need to, is to get what’s called a pre-marketing home inspection.

Typically in the buying process, the buyer is recommended on their own dollar to get a home inspection. And they use that as leverage, possibly to negotiate repairs. And our credits. So in the scenario that we’re in this for my clients, I had given them the option to get a pre-marketing home inspection.

And so one reason why this might be something for sellers to consider is it, it minimizes prices for the buyers as well. For the sellers in that manner, because they haven’t set it for net property for so many years. They don’t know what’s going on. A lot of times the property manager doesn’t let them know what happened.

The best thing they can do is go back to their accounting and see, oh, they had, they got billed for this. Okay. Okay. The toilet was repaired cuz or replaced. Cuz we see that in the bill, sometimes there’s a bill and there’s no detail. So the inspection helps. minimize those kinds of oopsies or like things they didn’t know about you.

And in theory it can reduce the buyer’s reason to cancel from the one inspection. So if providing, then with the buyers, with the information, if you want to at least be able to disclose things that popped up in this pre-marketing home inspection. It gives the buyers in theory, less outs because of, in things that they didn’t know, because they discovered it during their inspection, because we were able to let them know prior to getting into, to contract by right.

The buyer can opt out of the. contract based on for no reason for that matter in terms of if they’re still within that inspection period, but this just in theory mitigates the risk of them canceling on a, for a legitimate reason. It’s also in a pre-marketing home inspection is also a great marketing tool from the standpoint of being able to say to the buyers and the buyer’s agent in.

In good conscience that the seller is being upfront, honest and operating. Good in good fails in good faith without anything to hide. And it totally depends on the sellers because the sellers could take it two ways. They could go on the one side of the spectrum and be fully transparent to the point.

Oh here’s the pre-marketing home inspection report in. Take a look at it and you can see, or you could be on the opposite side of that spectrum and say, you know what, I haven’t set foot on this property. I’m gonna sell it as there are no credits, repairs, anything. So buyers now that you know, that you build in that, to your taking that to consideration in your offer, right?

So that’s theoretically you could be leaving meat on the bone though. So that’s why when you have that two ends of the spectrum, In theory, when you’re being more upfront and open you can hopefully get more for your property and pocket more. So it depends how you look at it again. Sometimes I have clients who are like, no, just as I take it.

I don’t wanna know anything. Just let them know. I don’t know anything. And that’s fine also. And again, situations where the owners haven’t seen their property in a long time is often when I. through that as a consideration for my sellers. So something for sellers to think about.

Yeah. See. So last I wanted to end with an update on the Kakaako neighborhood. So I went by today to take some clients over to the ward village. Area in the IBM building. And so I heard a few presentations. So quick update the Ali condo condominium that’s been completed already, but they still have some available studios that start at 660,000.

And there’s actually resale condos for Ali because it’s been done. I think some people are turning around and trying to sell them. Of course those are probably more. units that are, they were picked already. So the ones that are still sitting are not gonna be as, in good I guess part of the building, also co Ola is another complex similar to Ali, a little bit close, closer to the ocean and those studios start at seven 30.

They also have one bedroom at, in the nine hundreds and the two bedrooms at 1.2. So this one’s not gonna be actually done till I think. The fall quarter Q3 of this year. So those are for sale. A few units left. If you have, if you add to know anything, then P me, I have the pricing and the available units, but maybe for next month I’m gonna talk about the next building, that word villages or Howard Hughes is putting up and that complex is called Kalay.

And I’ll report next month. But lane, we talked about not Uru being on the ocean and having nothing to no views. So Kalia is one of those buildings that’s gonna be built right across from Aliana Boulevard. And it’s gonna have a view of the ocean in theory. They’re not building them similar to Naru where everyone has.

Ocean view, they’re doing it a little bit differently where I believe it’s, you’re either looking ever or diamond head. And then you have not a pick a peek, a Butte blue view, but you don’t get a straight shot view of the ocean so that everyone has some kind of view, but not the most gorgeous view, more information on KA coming soon. Those, when bedrooms start at 1.2. Just to let you focus on the downs, that could be for a while, but I’ll probably have a better, more comprehensive report with pictures and pricings. For next month, what’s the three bedroom, three bath costs. Because all these other ones are under like 1200 square feet.

Yeah. So, I think there’s gonna be like, I think that the highest would be like 5.3 fi in the 5 million. Oh, that’s probably this one, this three it’s at the corner unit three bedroom, three bath, 1457 square feet. So yeah, so Kale’s gonna be 330 units. 165 of those units are gonna be unrestricted, meaning, you can be an investor.

You don’t have to be living here. The remainder you have to be. It has to be owner occupied. Yeah. So what’s. oh, okay. So this Alii is not as good as Lua then. Yeah. Ali’s further towards the mountain. The unit sizes are a little bit smaller, the unit sizes. And then yeah, this interesting thing is Alii.

I have heard from a few buyers who stepped into the unit after cuz you’re buying off blueprints back then. And they’re like, oh my gosh, like this. This is so small. I can’t even believe how the engineers even, or the architectures they should be fired for coming. And man, you knew you should have known it’s gonna be tiny.

And, the thing is there weren’t any models to look at. Yeah. And I did see one of the Ali studios and it wasn’t that it seemed actually really big because of the way they made everything efficient and they had a Murphy bed and, but it reminded me of Murphy bed. You gotta live in the studios.

Yeah. Yes. If you’re, it reminded me of some of the Airbnbs, I stayed in Tokyo. If you are moving from, say Milani Maka from the four bedroom, three bath single family home, 2000 square feet, and you’re trying to. Squeeze yourself into a 350 square foot studio. Yeah. You’re gonna, you’re gonna be in a big bunch of shock.

Yeah. That’s the downgrade living with mom and dad. You get your living room and all the common air between the laundry room and you know that you get smaller quarters. You could, yeah, seriously. So I don’t know. It just depends how you look at it. Cuz the theory is that, you go back to your, so these micro apartment theories in these urban areas is you go up and you go to sleep there, but you’re gonna go down to the amenities that they have as well as the public amenities in terms of the restaurants and the shopping and the parks.

And know the interesting thing about transitioning back to Kalia is they’re gonna have these bungalows, it’s almost giant. I dunno like kitchens and the area. And one of the bongos has a pool where you can rent out. This area fits maybe 50 people and you have to pay a fee, but it’s almost like a miniature version of middle lane town association where you can rent out the big party room for your 300.

party, graduation, that kind of thing. It’ll be interesting, but yeah, Kala’s gonna be right on the, on Boulevard. So that should be an interesting one. I can, I’ll talk about that one and we can do even comparisons with the older inventory that has the video. Yeah. So that’s all I have for my section.

We’ll. If you guys wanna learn more about investing on the mainland, you guys can check out my podcast and we’ll pass it, cash flow, and the website simple pass it, cash flow.com, but let’s get to it here as this is a little chart that I put together where everybody’s complaining about the interest rates going up, but Hey, the interest rates go up, they cool off inflation and that’s just what the fed does.

And that’s, it’s kinda like your parents who told you couldn’t do something you wanted to do. That’s what the Fed is doing to make sure that we don’t go to hyper inflation and some con historical context of how long these times of cranking rates up, what did it go up? 70 per basis points last time.

It will probably go up half percent three quarter percent again next time, but you’re the last time it’s, it’s gone. 1.4 years, one and a half years. She lived 0.2 years from 2005 to 2008. The most recent one, 2017 to 2020, just before the pandemic was 2.6 years. So I would say, people say the interest rates are gonna go back down. I don’t think so, man. I think we’re looking at least another year of interest rates cranking up,

Best and worst places to raise a family. People like these for some strange injuries and, but Honolulu and Pearl city were like number one there. Oh, wow. Yeah.

Sanel is like a real estate guru staying away from Bitcoin. And if you guys are interested, I did a video called Crypto winter, which is upon us. I think it was live. Tomorrow on my YouTube channel, you guys can just Google it. Rich uncle is the YouTube channel. We try to keep things fun and light up there, but I’m not a huge fan of investing for sustainable returns, that type of stuff.

I do think it’s long term, so don’t get me wrong, but I just don’t. I took all my money, all that blocked by and all that type of stuff. Cuz there’s all this did. All the brokerages. I don’t know if that’s the right word to use, but of all the people on the exchanges there’s some turmoil happening on the staking side , but John Burns real estate consulting reports that demand is shifting from owning to renting with prices still pretty high.

There’s a bit of a. Home appreciation nationwide hit 20% in March of 2022. Making the largest jump in three decades. Mortgage payments went up about $600 with the latest increase in rents. If you live in Hawaii, that’s probably four times. Probably like two grand mortgage payments, right? Like most people used to pay three grand now it’s five GS right. Every month. Yep. Yep. Yep. In terms of new, the comparable new loan, right at the new lease, right?

Yeah, exactly. Should have done it yesterday. Yeah. Cause we all say, but I saw a picture the other day of some guy signing a noon loan. And I was like, really now’s the time to do it, but I guess, the rates are gonna go up more than likely in the next year. So I guess better now than later, but it’s a little too late to the party in a way.

Oh, I told you too. And that other slide that I showed, at, five, 6%, we’re still relatively low in the grand scheme of historical interest rates. You. Yeah. So exactly. So we’ve just been spoiled, when it, and it’s just shocking to us emotionally, as well as financially, when you look at how far down our buying part went, compared to when I was at 3% or below 3%, it’s very unnerving and it’s scary. It’s scary. . Yeah, but are you ready? That’s why I like your condos. Like your condos are, so I don’t wanna be offensive again. I always get that disclaimer, like one ha or 600 grand to 1.5 million, that’s all kind of semi middle class household house is like, to me, the people coming from the mainland are not middle class.

They’re all buying much larger or they can afford all charter, larger houses. Or more expensive houses. That’s 600 square feet here in Hawaii, apparently, but, yeah, like I, it’s binary. I think it’s like the low end folks, which is, most people in Hawaii are struggling and it’s the high end that can afford it.

And they are doing pretty well, all things pretty much it’s the elimination of the middle class, right? Yeah. The cation of the haves and the haves nots. Yeah. What do you wanna be? Dean? Do you wanna be, you can’t be middle class. You can’t stay in the middle and you have to go to one side, I wanna be on, I wanna be happy and I want my kids to be happy.

Yeah. Yeah. They’re not gonna be happy unless you pay $30 to see Snoopy and well, and not even bed an eye on it point us to the apartment market, nothing sign of slowing down rents. Road. Here are some apartment markets that are doing pretty well: Miami, New York, Fort LDO, Florida, Tempe, Orlando, San Diego, west Palm Nashville, Seattle, New York. Top smallest increases generally came in the Midwest and Northeast.

All the growth is in the Sunbelt. We keep talking about it again and again, and multi-housing news echoes that the rust belt and. Northeast, more people were leaving California, the rust belt and the Northeast heading to the Sunbelt and the Rocky mountain regions. This article they’re talking about out-of-state rental applications.

So people are moving out of their state. I know people are always moving out of Hawaii and the more affluent people are always moving back. Where are people relocating? Where are the magnets? Texas, Florida, Arizona, Georgia, and Tennessee. And this is what we’re talking about. The nation’s best renter retention rates for conventional apartments are occurring in the class B and the C units because of class B and C folks.

The middle class are not economically mobile and they cannot afford to buy houses, especially today. And this trend will fully continue on. Oh, here’s some places where they’re moving Class C are the apartments that aren’t raising rents as much as the high end, because the high end aren’t there, they have more money to spend, especially these days coming outta the pandemic.

Which is a little perplexing too, because you would think that maybe the people who are on the fringe or the bees move down to the seas, but right. So you just don’t have the ability to pay much more. Seems this one has some pertinent to Hawaii folks. But this is all the way in New York. This is a sort of anti rent control bill that got passed. Just one in a line of many I’m sure there’ll be more rent control, but I always look to you, you’re drawing us out with the paper. Oh my bet. All right. We’re always Looking at states like California and New York, where you are seeing this kind of precedent centering type of laws being passed because Hawaii is very progressive in terms of laws and equality.

In terms of financial equality, changes in my opinion, One time, Hawaii that comes up for discussion. Once in a while at the legislature rent control, it’s very scary. We don’t have rent control here. We do not, but it comes, it comes up every once in a while, every session. I dunno if it’s every session, but it becomes a topic of discussion because of the high cost of living there.

Affordability problem. Did you hear that Hawaii’s minimum wages can get raised, I don’t know, 10 years from now that was that a big thing or I just saw that article. Yeah. It’s see, I don’t even initially right on the fed side I think Obama was going, he was successful.

And I don’t know. I feel that I understand what they’re trying to do, but. I have a feeling it’s gonna backfire from the standpoint of, when we hear big, like on the federal side with that, I feel like now we saw McDonald’s a lot of those kiosks popping up in the cashiers.

Yeah. At the Safeways, we see the self checkout lines, more popping up, even Costco. So I feel like it might have a backward effect. you’re gonna actually displace the human resource. Yeah. I’ve never seen so many parking attendants. The guys who take your ticket.

There’s none of that. On the main night, everything is Automated, you don’t have some random person just staying in that little booth all day, making X dollars an hour. You don’t have any of that. I think El Elon Musk was watching an interview with him and he was saying that, with all of this technology, AI and everything, it’s gonna make a lot of this menial labor.

Positions that were handled in previously by, from, by humans, handled by technology and AI to the point where you know, people that don’t ha these, I, I guess for lack of better unskilled labor type positions are, might go away and who need to have, like a socialistic society where. Some people, the homeless, won’t be homeless, the jobless population will grow because there won’t be any jobs for a certain type of demographic or amount of education.

There, there won’t be any jobs for a big portion of the population. So the governments are gonna have to just pretty much just give them money and because they, there’s no way they’re gonna find a job. Go on Reddit and read the anti work thread. It’s funny. It’s made to be funny, but it is super sad because like people, you have to get into so much student debt to get a halfway decent job to make 50 cheese a year.

It’s ridiculous. And then one of there’s funny things and it’s okay, Make me do this bullshit application for a job that takes me like an hour. And then I have to upload all my job experience every single time. And then you’re not gonna tell me what the stupid pay is. That’s absurd, but that’s just how it is.

I don’t know. It just, yeah, like it, it is getting so separated. This is why I just wanna go to my gated community where when everybody gets so pissed off and everybody just fights in the streets, I will be away. And maybe, I know you’re not allowed to have guns, but maybe I’ll get a cannon or like a lightsaber and protect myself.

But yeah, like it just, yeah, it feels, feel sorry for a lot of folks out there. It’s just the system. Yeah. But yeah, I agree like the, raising the minimum wage is gonna get just passed down to the lower guys somehow. Yeah. Yeah. But let’s just keep focus on keeping the status quo for now.

But yeah, CNBC business, their opinion. It’s time to prepare for a recession. I’m not, I don’t really see this happening too much. We’re already, we’ve already had a negative 1.5% GDP. Last quarter and our recession is officially two quarters of that in a row. But like when the previous quarters passed were like 20% plus gains then you’re due for one of these once in a while.

You’re still net positive. yeah. You’re still net positive on one year moving average, these articles they need to sell, they need to sell doom and gloom. But I do think that the war in Ukraine is going longer, or the lockdowns in China, cuz that’s gonna make even more supply chain shocks. those are just two of them.

What they call the black Swan events that could potentially happen. That probably won’t, that is there’s always black swans events that could happen, but I don’t know. I don’t know. It’s why you buy stuff that makes sense in cash flows, as opposed to gambling on things. And don’t.

Any commentary there, Dean, I just was gonna say with that said, how, what, how are you getting ready for this? Or how are you? I think in a discussion I had with you, you folks, in, in a different setting, it was like, part of me, is getting caught up with all of this, these Domain gloom stories and taking my foot off of the gas in terms of.

My investing because I’m at where I’m at now. I’m still in the acquisition phase. So in theory, all things being the same, I should be pedaling to the metal and buying cash, flowing properties, but seeing this kind of thing in the media, in terms of the recession coming up and it’s maybe I’ll keep that cash for a little while.

And although I’m losing. Up, 8% keeping it in cash. If, and when there’s a big correction, then, I can put, be buying whatever real estate stocks. Yeah. Crypto at a discount and at the bottom waiting for everything to go up. So it’s what are you, how are you taking the, all of these kinds of articles since you’re reading them, just buy stuff that cash flows now.

But that whole thing that you said makes a lot of sense, but in practice it’s impossible. Do you remember 2008, right? That was your big moment. could you have picked the bottom and picked the right point? No, you probably are. So you could even do it in 2011, 12, 13, 14, 50.

Like you, you are not able to pick the bottom, just like again, 20, 20. The bottom fell out. But did you have the coho to go back in and summer of 20, 20 or 2021? No it’s impossible to catch, go in is, which is part of the practicality of that type of strategy. And I don’t claim that I’m that smart or have the clogs that do it either when it drops.

So I’m just gonna dollar cost average, and just, yeah, I was about to say the exact same term. So look what happened in 2020, like the bottom things dropped, right? I don’t have any of that type of stuff. That’s why I do real estate. But if you are already in you and you held onto real estate, you got that tremendous climb up.

There was no way you could have jumped into it. Hit that wave. If you are sitting on the sidelines or on shore, you have to be in the water in there holding onto the asset. Yeah. And by the time it’s all happening. You’re like oh no. Oh no. yeah. If you have enough man, like by all power to you, you can do what you want.

But most of the people saying this do Gloo and they’re gonna hold onto cash. Are. Guys are under half a million million dollars net worth. And to me, you can’t sit there with that. That’s just not enough on my own, for me. Yeah. But if you wanna do something, that’s what life, that’s what the cashier life insurance is.

It’s a way of pun. If that’s a really conservative way you wanna play it. That’s a good point too, in terms of getting like it’s you’re not going to. Kill it with the returns, but you’re, you have something better than sitting in, in cash in the bank, and then you have so many options in terms of, accessing the cash for, yeah.

For what investments in, and not applying that. Yeah. I’ll say on a recorded line, I will guarantee that people cannot time the bottle. Oh, I got a chopstick-like wrapper and I put it in front of my daughter. And trying to test her like reflexes just to troll her.

She cannot catch that thing. Just like how people cannot catch. They cannot, like, whenever this bottom comes in, you cannot catch it. It’s just not. You scared me when you said that, I’ll say this on, on, on the record. I was like, oh, what? Oh, should I have to press the pause or what? Okay. So why am I saying outlandish things?

My second thing that I will bet on is I don’t think rents ever go down for longer than one to three years. I’m willing to take that bet. Why? With that said too, saying the stock market in the long run always goes up real estate. Oh, I don’t know. I don’t know. In Japan, that’s not the case.

And people say we could be like that, but rents never go down. I don’t know. And gravity works but. Anyway, We had some of these other things. We hit our time limit here. And we are looking to change the show and how, where do you guys wanna talk about? So if you guys have any feedback, please reach out to myself or Dean and we’ll see you guys next time.

July 2022 Monthly Market Update

Hello everybody. This is the July, 2022 monthly market update, where I’m gonna be going over some collection of news articles that I thought were relevant for investors out there. And if you guys are interested in getting to know us and our community a little bit better, join our group at simplepassivecashflow.com/club.

There we’ll be sending out invites. We’ve got a mixer in Los Angeles, second week of July and then third week of July Arizona. So if you guys want to be invited to those events and not have FOMO, because they’re at home wondering if you’re the only accredited investor out there investing in real estate all by yourself, you guys can join up with those groups.

So check out my book the journey in simple passive cash flow, which you guys can access. That’s the little hint by listening to these videos. You guys get the little hints here, there, which is to get the free audio version at simplepassivecashflow.com/book. And you guys also can check out these recordings.

We keep ’em at simplepassivecashflow.com/investorletter. So if you wanna go back to all the past months reports and see what I’m saying and catch me if I’m lying or saying that it’s a good market or bad market, or not, you guys can go back to those archives. But first thing, I think everybody’s talking about interest rates creeping up, but this kind of was a nice chart that I found where it showed the points in the timeline when the Fed increased the rates quite a bit.

And how long of an increase was it before they backtracked and where they realize, oh shoot, we manipulated the interest rates too high, and the economy’s getting crappy. We better stop doing that. So again, a lot of this, if you guys are listening in the podcast form, which that’s our main channel, but we also put this up on the YouTube channel and to make it confusing, there’s actually two YouTube channels there’s the simple passive cash flow channel and then there’s the rich uncle channel, which is more geared towards non-accredited investors out there where the accredited investors should check out more simple, passive cash flow stuff. But what we’re looking at here is, there’s been 1, 2, 3, 4 times in history, not including now from 1990 to 2022.

So the last 30 years where there’s been periods where the Fed has increased rates gradually. Right now we’re in a bit of an incline right now. Nobody knows how long it’s going to go. But what I’m personally looking at is is unemployment gonna start creeping up? Because right now, every lot of the metrics are looking really good.

And, I follow ITR economics, they’re an unbiased type of data source I look at and a lot of things are looking good. I don’t know where a lot of people are getting this, all this doom and gloom type of stuff. And when you’ll get the doom and gloom people, a lot of ’em are broke, which is why, they’re always just looking for excuses not to do anything.

This time it’s unique. The reason why they’re increasing interest rates is because inflation is so high, which means if you don’t do anything and just play, oh, there’s doom and gloom. I’m just gonna sit on my butt and not do anything and just sit on cash. You will lose nine, 10% of your money every single year.

But yeah, if you, this is sort, we wanna keep this interactive folks. So if you guys have any questions or comments, please type it into the chat below. But yeah. Article here from Wallet hub best and worst places to raise a family. Now, I always look at these there’s so many of these types of like top 10 places and sometimes they don’t mean very much just on, if you’re looking to move the top 10 places, Fremont, California, Overland park, Kansas Irvine, California, Plano, Texas, Columbia, Maryland, San Diego, California. Seattle Washington, Santa Jose Manon, Scottsdale Arizona. So may or may not be the most, may not be the best places to invest, but supposedly there’s the best places to have a family. Honolulu is out there at 34, but if you’re like me, you wanna know where the worst places are, cuz you like to tease those places. Some of those are like Detroit, Cleveland, Memphis, Birmingham center, Bernardino, California, Newark umlet billPort Jackson, Mississippi, and Augusta, Georgia.

Billionaire Sam Zel, who is a real estate guru out there. He says I’ve stayed away from Bitcoin at all costs Sam whose net worth has estimated 5.8 billion reiterated that his anti Bitcoin stands Thursday, inter interview with CNBC. And I quote, he says I basically stayed away from Bitcoin at all costs. I think that’s when it’s all said and done. Any kind of currency without the backing of a government is in some fashion, unlikely to work.

I think Warren buffet or his other buddy Munger said they would never invest in companies like Apple and tech companies, but they eventually took up a big holding. I’m not a big fan of actually I do like how these cryptocurrencies Bitcoin, Etherium, in, for the most part, because they’re more of the blue chip type of cryptos are here to stay.

But I don’t invest with, especially now with all the turmoil, with all these big companies, which are like the brokerages are going under. And I think I actually have a long video on this, like crypto, winter. It’ll probably be released next week. YouTube got angry at us cuz we didn’t use free music.

So we have to rework that. We’ll probably get it out later on this week for you guys on the rich channel. Wall Street journal reports that bidding wars overheated the home buyer market. Now they’re coming for renters. So bidding wars have been long stable house housing markets where buyers compete with offers above the seller listings price.

Now with the home buyer pricing, going back in the favor, the buyers. Now that they’re also saying that an increased number of white collar professionals, some who recently sold houses are reluctant to buy because of record high home prices. Rising mortgage rates which ultimately is affordability.

They’re renting instead, and this is driving up the demands. It’s good if you’re a landlord on the right side of this, the median US asking rent price has to $2,000 for the first time in may. If there’s one thing I’m going to do if I would like to gamble on something is like rents don’t really go down for long periods of time. Now, once a long period of time, I don’t know, like one to three years or greater, a big range, but it’s just true. In my opinion, it’s just not something that really goes down. John Burns real estate consulting. They’re talking about the man shifting from owning to renting.

I still rent folks. It’s cool. I’m not a loser because I don’t own my own house. I invest it instead and they make a lot more at the end of the day, paying rent. Yes, it is technically like throwing money down the tube. But if you have your money sitting in your home equity, doing nothing that is even worse.

So you gotta look holistically. So if they break down the difference, the cost of owning versus renting, single family homes, and a little over a year ago, the monthly cost of owning and renting were virtually identical. And it’s, that’s what we call in the engineering world. The crossover play. We love the crossover.

Hey Lloyd. Yeah, let me know when you wanna speak to the LA group. To do it, especially if it’s virtual, I like that visual stuff, so I can not travel and be away and let me sleep on my own bed. That was the thing I was traveling a lot for when I did work. And this sucks, some people get off on getting all these freaking fire points and having high status and like, all right, that’s cool.

But each their own, I just don’t think that’s all. Oh, I think that’s a little overrated. Again, each their own. I don’t wanna offend anybody out there, but that’s just not my thing. I prefer to stay at home. So they’re also saying Raleigh Durham, Nashville, Denver, Tampa and Phoenix have all witnessed the biggest disparity in increasing home ownership versus rental costs.

Again, you guys can take a look at all these charts on the YouTube channel. If you really wanna geek out on the numbers. Matthew says it’s a long term game. Don’t worry about the short term GDP numbers. I guess while we are talking about GDP numbers, last quarter, like a recession, is defined as two quarters in a role where you have negative GDP growth.

Last quarter was negative 1.5, which sounds not the greatest. And typically we’re tracking upon two to 3% is what the Fed would like. But the year prior in 2021 like we hit 20 something percent. So yeah yeah, relative speaking, that was a horrible quarter. But to me, it’s just like a lot of pent up demand flushing through the system.

And I would actually expect, the 20% is ridiculous. It’s also ridiculous to shut down a country for about a quarter two. But I just think overall, you can look at it from like a one year trend line. You’re still doing pretty dang good. I don’t know where this Dodo is going.

I’m cautious. Don’t get me wrong and then buying off good debt, service, risk coverage ratios. But, I don’t know. I just think people really like doom, gloom, and fear point. I heard that friend means that one fear point, I like that. Sorry, junior. Sorry, you’re offended. I try not to offend people.

The joint center for housing studies at Harvard says that record breaking home prices and rents like to cool as interest rates climb. Thank you, Harvard for pointing out something super obvious, but if this is new to you guys, so what’s happening is the interest rates climb because again, the fed is using interest rates to cool off inflation, which is pretty high right now.

The interest rates are important because that impacts how much people can borrow or in other words, affordability. So people can’t afford that mortgage that they couldn’t afford in the first place they sure can’t afford now with the interest rates going up, which is why we don’t know if there’s less, more supply, less demand.

We don’t know what the prices are a composite of that and we do know it is like the prices aren’t going up at the same rate that once was in the past year or two. And nor would I say that those two increases from the last few years were sustainable again. And this is where a lot of people are like, oh my God, it’s slowing growth.

The world is over. And it’s saying oh, it’s still growing guys. Just because it’s not going up 20% or rent isn’t going up 20%, like in 2021 doesn’t mean the world’s coming to end. So with interest rates rising on top of the double digit home prices, the income and savings needed to qualify for a home loan have skyrocketed, which is, really wordy way of saying that affordability is taking a hit.

Potential home buyers saw monthly mortgage payments on the median price, US home rise by more than $600 over the past year. That’s on the monthly payments. $600 for most people is a big chunk for sure. Last takeaway from this article, these joint centers for housing studies. If you guys are always looking for good stuff to read, that’s not just like your Yahoo, finance and CNBC stuff. These are actually pretty good, insightful articles. Sometimes they don’t tell us anything. And that’s why I try to throw some of this stuff out.

But they’re saying renters were particularly burned in the first year of the pandemic, job and income losses early in the pandemic, increased affordability challenges for millions of households who are already struggling. And this is talking about how the pandemic wasn’t really fair, right? The higher end, the people in the B+, A+ housing live and work from home.

They order Uber eats and they continue to work at their computers where the people who are on the lower end, your class, C class B housing, your renters, your workforce housing, or your workforce that live in workforce housing. Are there the correct workers out there? And sometimes their jobs were cut off because of that pandemic shutdown.

John Burns reports that in the first three weeks of may 30 year mortgages hovered around. 5.25 and ease just above 5%. By month end, as for sale demand weekend, single family rentals are conform. These are, these would be good for you guys to take a look at again. We post that at simplepassivecashflow.com/investor letter.

John Burns. Yeah. These things are kind of meat to go over in the video and the podcast version. So we’ll skip ahead to a real page. They’re talking about the US apartment market showing no signs of slowing down yet. This is where I’d like to separate like the residential housing world, which is based on comparable sales, which is based on not investor sentiment, but just regular average people who need a house to live in it.

Affordability, interest rates are a big thing to them. Whereas this is more on the commercial side. Not seeing a quite slow down yet. In fact, we’re actually, as of right now in July, 2022, I would say that we are still in a micro bubble where we’re in a buyer’s market. You’re probably wondering what the heck is lane saying it’s a buyer’s market.

Yes. Because a lot of the institutions, the guys who really move the markets that are buying a big. Apartments and commercial assets, they pulled out about a month ago and just did nothing and just waited to see the situation, which greatly takes out a lot of the demand and the supply demand dynamic.

Therefore there’s more, a little more supply than demand out there than there is normally, which creates a buyer’s market. So there’s a little bit of a buying opportunity right now. And. But, that’s typical, right? Like when things are uncertain and people are what do we do here?

That’s the time to be buying. Of course every deal is pretty typical or every deal is individual. And I’m just speaking in generalities. But now that’s why I think if you’re out there looking for more of these commercial larger deals that institutions might be looking after 200 or 500 units.

There might be an opportunity before those bigger players come back and they’ll come back in because they have to buy, and this should make people sick to their stomach. These large institutions and others get most of their money when they deploy capital. So they gotta come back in, pay for their own salaries at some point.

Which I would probably say maybe next year’s kind of, when this little micro bubble will close up or next month and this micro bubble will close up and it gets. To normal. So markets with the steepest replacement rents as of may, Le reading off from the top Miami New York for Ladale Tampa, Orlando, San Diego, west Palm beach, Nashville, Seattle, New York, New Jersey among individual Metro areas, Florida remains home to some of the largest rent increases. Among the 50 size Metro areas, the smallest increases Jerry came in the Midwest and the Northeast.

No surprise cuz who wants to live there. Sorry, junior, if you’re offended by that, just joking. He identified himself as the Canary and the coalmine offended person, but, Midwest and Northeast, nobody wants to live there apparently anymore because they’re all moving away because maybe it’s too cold. Whatever it is, that’s what the numbers show. Most of the people are moving down to the south. The Sunbelt states multi-housing news. Out of state rental applications rose 42% during the pandemic since the TransUnion, which means that people are moving out of state, Texas had the largest increase in new residents between 2020 and 2021 with more than 310,000 residents while New York saw the highest decrease. Losing about the same, more people were leaving California, the rust belt and Northeast, and heading to the Sunbelt and Rocky mountain regions. Wow.

Didn’t I say that last time? The top 10 multifamily markets by sales volume in 2021. Just reading ’em off from the top to the bottom, Dallas Fort Worth, Atlanta, Phoenix, Houston, Denver, Miami, Washington, DC, Orlando, Tampa, Petersburg, Tampa St. Petersburg Raleigh. Now I would, I just wanna point out just because there’s a lot of like sales volume, does it really mean too much?

Because like some of these are much larger markets than others. And just because things are being transacted there doesn’t, to me doesn’t really mean anything. But I think it’s just like for people looking for anomalies in the data, this would be one of those to put on your radar.

But at these 10, none of these really surprise me. These are, you always see these ones up there now, top multi-family markets for construction activities. So these are. Be where you’re gonna see the most units come online. And at first gut reaction, you would think that this might be bad I don’t know.

From one point of view, you could think of this as a bad idea, because if you have an apartment in say Dallas, which is number one, that’s more competition coming online. But on the other hand, why the heck are these super smart development companies building stuff over there in the first place?

If they’re the demand. Take it for what you guys want. But here’s the list. And from the most to the least Dallas, Austin, Phoenix, Washington, DC, Miami, New York, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Seattle, Denver,

And it’s the same, same information, but from the real page, most apartments under construction. Phoenix Austin, New York, Dallas, Washington, DC, New York, Atlanta, Los Angeles, Seattle, Denver. That’s pretty much the same thing. That’s what meta-analysis is: you compare two or more articles, which we just did.

So commercial property executives talking about five states that are corporate relocation, magnet nets. What’s making these people relocate there? Maybe there’s a more influx of headquarters. I know a lot of ’em are going to Texas every day. But yeah. Number one, Texas. Number two, Florida.

Number three, Arizona. No surprise there. Just to name a few. So Texas is Tesla digital Realty, Oracle ACOM with pat K. We have a lot of engineers in our group, so I. Most of ’em have worked for AECOM at some point in their life, Florida companies like blockchain.com, block tower capital, the Walt Disney companies, SkyWater technologies and Arizona companies like send, do so move and align technology.

I don’t know what these companies are, but I know Arizona has a lot of the growth of the semiconductor front. They don’t want those, People out of the east to take our, they took our lunch with the whole semiconductors back in the day, but now we’re gonna try and eat them at their own game or that was once our game with the semiconductors out there with Intel.

If you guys are all interested in that, just like YouTube, TSMC, Intel, and the Mac articles, those videos will come. But other states are Georgia and Tennessee,like 1.2, five battery giga factory set to rise near Phoenix. California. And I put this one in here just to note that tech companies aren’t completely abandoning all their office space folks. It is coming back, who knows it’s gonna be the same as before, but I think companies are starting to realize that the need for a physical presence is real.

CNBC business. There’s an article on is it time to prepare for a recession? So they’re saying the economies are close to entering recession. Perhaps as soon as this year to avoid taking too much of a financial hit, Americans will need to prepare, where do they go, okay. What would they say here?

They’re saying that there’s some economic headwinds with war, Ukraine, COVID lockdowns and China reply resulting in supply shocks that boosted inflation and slow growth. A key part of the inflation problem is linked to the massive 3.9 trillion in fiscal stimulus ejected into the economy in 2020 and 2021.

That’s why everybody’s stock market stuff blew up the last couple years and why you’re starting to give it back now. And you’re saying for the average ER, it’s hard to find a place to hide. Recessions are usually accompanied by outright bear markets with stocks following by well over 20%. And when fed now hiking rates aggressively, the bond market is no safe Haven equities and bond markets are riskier.

Usually, what can Americans do for a CMBC business? One answer may be due to nothing and just try to write out the volatility without trying to time the market. That was probably written by some financial planner who says, oh, it goes up and down. You might as well just stay where you’re at. And I can keep my assets of the management fee with you.

They also say consumers might consider coming back on non-essential spending, especially avoiding Spying on big ticket items. Yeah. A crappy, but here’s my take off the top of my head. I would like, I would, is this the right term monetize? My helos, if you guys, he have helos, I would get that into cash and put it into like life insurance.

That way you can control it. So when, if they ever do pull those home equity lines of credit, you’re not at the bank’s mercy to arbitrarily, just randomly do that stuff. I would also say, this is why you invest in cash flow, right? The people who got hurt back in 2007 and eight were the idiots who were betting on appreciation.

And when things went down they couldn’t pay their debt service. So what that’s, what it comes down to, it’s not a loan to value things. It’s a debt to service, coverage ratio. And especially with things like your guys’ homes that don’t make any money, it’s not how much equity or loan the value has. What’s your debt service coverage ratio?

You’re probably saying you’re being a smartass lane. My house doesn’t have any debt service coverage ratio. It doesn’t make any money. That’s exactly why you shouldn’t have it in the first place, in my opinion, unless your net worth is two to three times greater than what your house.

So you have a $500,000 house. I don’t think you should buy a house until your network is one, 1.5 at least. That’s why they call me a rich uncle. And I’m like a cranky uncle in a way. And that’s, you can hear more of that on that YouTube channel, Fannie MA’s article here, they’re talking about rising rates, persistent inflation and further soft economic outlook.

What the last article was saying. They’re saying expectations that the full year 2022 real GDP world will be at a reduced rate of 1.3%. So positive. But they’re reducing their initial guidance, a little less than 1%. But that’s technically not a recession, right?

Recession is two negative quarters in a row. But here’s the thing, right? Like when nobody knows when this recession is gonna end. No, I actually quite frankly think we’re in a relative recession right now, but the hard thing is you can’t time the market, like when this thing goes, unless you’re in playing in the game and the hard thing with real estate, it’s you can’t just come back in.

You can’t time the market. So as soon as you think it’s coming back, if you’ve already lost it already, Wealth management.com. They’re talking about rising interest rates. Aren’t stopping apartment investors from cutting deals, fed plans to continue to raise interest rates, to help stem inflation. And that’s changing the math for apartment investors, looking to make deals. Other factors, rising rents are still going up.

And are offsetting the interest rates. One thing that I’ll say that’s not in here, that’s hurting cash flow now is because the property values are going up, the property taxes are going up and that’s can take a huge chunk out of, not a huge chunk, but like 10 to 20% of like your cash flow on the property taxes in the end.

That’s good. I, because you’re. Property is going up in value and you don’t get to realize that until the end. But that’s the big thing there. Oh I’m glad you did this, Matt. Cuz I’m gonna troll you right here. So this is probably one of the biggest mistakes I see investors make is that you have maybe $200,000 equity in your house. And you think of it in terms of like how most people think of it, where you’re borrowing it like 2.7%, which is a great interest rate, but that’s not how sophisticated investors stink at things.

They don’t really, yeah. Interest rate is important, but they don’t care about interest rate. They care about your net worth and what’s happened to your net worth. So the important thing is to like what you can do with that $200,000 equity and put it elsewhere. You could probably buy like three other or four other houses with.

I think the biggest thing is if you can get into the value add game, I think there’s a lot of like lower networked investors doing that, buy rent, rehab, birth strategy, but for a lot of in credit investors, that’s just a waste of time, especially if you make, multiple six figures doing that type of stuff.

And you’re working with little pull down contractors who just are like one day from stealing your money. Take a look. What I would say is look at, simple, passive, casual.com/ro OE return on equity, download the spreadsheet and just follow the numbers right after a certain time, when your equity goes up, your return on equity goes down and it, after time, it you’re probably making like less than double digits at that point need to do one or three things, do a Helo.

Buy more assets with that Helo or do a refinance buy more assets with that, that, or sell the asset and give you that up into more and more assets, essentially relenting yourself back up to that, 80% loan to value that you started and just keeping that value high, what do I know?

I know I have 8,000 properties but Fortune magazine says the cooling housing market enters into the great DEC acceleration, inventory levels are rising again. I think the nice thing, the cool thing about here is this kind of cyclical too, which we definitely see inventory coming down.

Cooling housing prices enter the great DEC acceleration. So they always come up with these little marketable terms to sell headlines. The great deceleration or the other one I heard was, I can’t even remember it, it’s that kind of stuff. That’s all, it’s simple folks, right?

Like inflation is high because they pumped a lot of fake money into the economy the last two, three years because of the pandemic, who knows what else they’re hiding. But that’s what happened. And like the stock market is high because of that. And because they pumped a lot, this money in there, inflation is.

So inflation, they need to keep that between two to 3%. And that’s what the Fed is mandated to do so that they can keep the highs relatively moderate. And, but more importantly, keep the lows, not as low and which is why they are increasing the interest rates to get some dry powder there now.

But they don’t wanna do it too much to crater the economy in which, so they have to look at things like unemployment because it is a It’s a it’s a sensitive game, right? It’s complicated. First the federal reserve has moved into inflation. Fighting mode, says fortune uh, second, the overheated 2022 spring market has pushed us over the edge into what housing economists calls, an overvalued housing market. Yeah, I would probably say things are a little bit overheated, here’s my, here’s my crystal ball.

I don’t really care. To me it’s like the NBA finals. I don’t care if the golden state warriors are in. And I don’t know who else, who did they play? I guess they heat. I think they played the heat. I don’t care if the Lakers aren’t playing, but that’s how I look at the residential housing market.

Like I don’t really give a. Where it goes. But if I were to guess, I think that there will be some softening, but, prices might go down 5%, but I don’t think if you’re a person out there, you can time it, unless you like, you’re real. You’re like a realtor. It’s just gonna keep going up and on factor this we’re in a Fiat currency world.

It’s all fake money at this. And as long as the Fed can keep inflation under control, meaning it can keep going like this forever. Zillow says that the most popular markets of early 20, 22 pricey suburbs topless were Woodenville, Washington, Burke, Virginia Highlands ranch, west chase, Florida, which is Tampa, Seattle, Los Angeles, Atlanta. Los Angeles, San Louis, and Denver. I don’t know if that’s useful for people, that’s, I guess those are great places to live.

I don’t know if there are great places to invest, real page reports, neighborhood level, resident retention levels. So retention levels are when. Tenants are turned, not turned over, but they renew their contracts to stay. And it could be for a variety of reasons, but seemingly if they are staying as renters, this may be a sign that they’re not able to step up to home ownership, or they’re not economically mobile.

Obviously the best retention rates, as they’re saying here is class B and C, because those are your less economically mobile people. Like we had. I would say a couple of nicer class, B plus type of assets, and a lot of the people there, they jumped ship because interest rates were really low a couple years ago and they moved up, which kind of sucked for us.

It’s kinda if you have a good employee and then they leave you because they’re good, it makes you sad. It’s the same feeling that class B and the C are the type of residents that do stay, some save all their lives, actually some markets with the best retention. Indianapolis Cleveland Milwaukee, New York, Miami San Diego, Riverside, Boston, and wealth management.com. In this article, I’ll just summarize basically class a. Apartments are going up and price higher where the class C the lower end stuff isn’t as much. And this is obvious why, right? Cuz the higher end stuff, they’re a little bit less price sensitive where the class C stuff people, they are more value driven.

And also I think coming out of the pandemic, as I said earlier in the show, people who are class, a type of tenants, had a much easier time. Time through the pandemic economically, where a lot of the class C workforce housing folks had a tough time. And we had some folks, sometimes we’ll get to work with the church and they’ll come in and they’ll sit down with the people and help ’em, do job applications and stuff like that.

Or, the people from like the mall will come in, put up flyers and it’s just, I don’t know. They. It’s tough. Like I say money doesn’t make, is not everything, but it sure makes life a lot easier. Multi-housing news reports that New York says no to a good cause. Eviction bill.

So this is a landmark type of article and this, I would say, look. Bills like this to set precedence. And so basically what happened was that New York state ended its legislative session without taking action on the proposed good cause eviction bill, a decision that was cheered by multifamily industry representatives.

We say it amounts to another form of rent control and will hinder rather than create affordable housing. And, so basically it’s It’s not rent control happening the opposite of that, and this kind of bounces back and forth. We, I think the last landmark type of article we had that maybe happened several months ago in California, where they had, they started to allow in single family home zoned areas they allow multi-family zone areas, which, It’s essentially a democratic Republican argument where, you know, like the affluent areas don’t want multifamily in their backyard.

But the prices get so expensive, like expensive. What are you gonna do? So these states are like New York and California, and Oregon and Washington are typically more. They deal with the stuff first, right? Like them, they’re on the forefront and they pin away set precedents for the states to come after.

But if you’re somebody who’s against rent control, this was a good one for you guys. I just think that eventually things typically go in the favor of rent control and that type of stuff. New York to transform distressed hotels into affordable housing. This law allows for class B hotels to use certificates of occupancy to operate as residential spaces. Add more flexible rules for converting underutilized hotel space into affordable housing.

Type any questions you guys have into the chat. But if you guys haven’t joined our group, you can go to simplepassivecashflow.com/club. And if you guys are an accredited investor and really tired of just screwing around with all these non-accredited investors out there and you wanna find a close knit, private group, check out our family office ohana mastermind, which is our inner circle at simplepassivecashflow.com/journey. Pretty much everybody’s accredited these days. It’s actually 90 members now. This is outdated, but we just have to come to the events and talk to the other FOOM members. I would say it’s hard for me to go over it.

We’ll hit you guys hopefully I think junior was offended earlier. We made amends. I should probably watch myself in my jokes before we need to meet in person, which I think we will. I think I saw your name on the list for Los Angeles, so we will meet in person and then we can offend each other.

But if not no questions. We will see you guys. Thanks, Andrew. Thanks for your comments and then Matthew, no hard feelings. You get that VA loan. That’s good for you. That’s why you do all that service, but yeah. Matt says I’m offended by people being offended by jokes.

Thanks for leaving those comments. It makes me not quiver, walking around, watching myself behind my back. Someone’s gonna shank me or something, but we’ll see you guys next time and stay calm, cash flow on.

Three BS Financial Dogma | Don’t Make These Financial Mistakes

Today’s podcast. You’re going to be hearing me being interviewed by another guy. And the reason why I wanted to share this is because it was actually pretty good. I go on maybe several podcasts as a guest speaker every week. Which puts our brand out there and really helps us attract the best people to come to our events and join up with our community, which we highly vet people coming into our group.

If you guys want to, submit yourself and try to meet other people, you guys can submit your name to simplepassivecashflow.com/club. And to get to know you guys a little bit better for some of you guys who’ve joined the email list. Let’s book a call.

Everybody gets a free strategy session. After that, you’ve got to pay for it. A lot of people out here and you’ve got to spread the wealth. A lot of folks have been listening to this podcast for four or five years now. And it’s always cool to interact with people.

And that’s been my mission that I’ve realized as of late if I can just get on the phone or a zoom call with someone for five minutes and let’s talk some stuff out. There’s so much bad financial advice out there. And a lot of the stuff that the wealthy people are doing, investing in good deals, using real estate tax advantages to pay little to no taxes, say it that way.

And infinite banking, you add those three combos up. It’s a very powerful thing. And a lot of the things is, finding other mentors and people doing this. You guys can check out our events at simplepassivecashflow.com/events. It does cater towards the family office ohana members.

We want to get to know you guys. We want to vet you guys coming in. If you guys are a good fit for our close knit community out there. Check out this podcast and again join our investor clubs simplepassivecashflow.com/club. Let’s get to know each other a little bit better.

And then hopefully we’ll see you guys in Hawaii in January, they’re treated, it’s going to be barring any fourth, fifth pandemic again. It was a great experience last year and what we should be wrapping up the promo video we created. And for a lot of you guys, who went on the trip.

It should be a fun watch to recap the memories that felt like long ago back in January. But if you guys want to check out other replays of our other past events you can go to simplepassivecashflow.com/events. And yeah, don’t be a stranger out there. Don’t be that guy, just listen to the podcast who doesn’t interact with anybody. Here’s the show.

We’re going to talk about counterintuitive wealth rules that the rich follow. Lane has a unique way of talking on this subject and you have experience in this topic Lane. But before all that, before we get into the meat and potatoes of the show,

let’s talk about your past and how you got started in real estate. So currently I run apartment syndications that currently have over 6,000 units today, but, where I started from was back in 2009 when I bought my first rental property. I grew up in a household where we’re taught to be very frugal, go to school, get a good job.

I eventually became an engineer because I followed this linear path, right? All this financial dogma, go buy the house to live in. I eventually started to rent it out. And that’s where I got this taste of cash flow and I eventually bought more and more of these turnkey rentals out of state for cash flow and then often a little bit.

Awesome. Yeah. You took the traditional path of becoming an engineer. What was it like to go to school for that long and then arrive to the realization that you weren’t where you needed to be. I got to my freedom number and I was still working and I had changed jobs a couple of times. In the beginning, I worked for a private company. I guess that’s where you learn the most as a professional, but I searched for easier jobs to work at . So I’d have more free time to do what was really important, which is the real estate investing part of it.

So I eventually created a nice lifestyle where the jobs are pretty cruise and, it was able to invest passively. Eventually I got to a point where I started to do bigger deals, started jumping other people’s money involved and therefore even needed to turn it into a true profession and spend all my time doing it.

That was where I finally quit my job back in 2018, I think, and never looked back since. I think the hardest thing that a lot of people talk about when they make that jump. Especially if you’re a high paid professional your identity is wrapped up. I wasn’t engineered to introduce yourself.

You say you’re an engineer. And part of it is that baggage or that identity, you went to school for a dozen plus years to be this profession. And you feel like you’re just throwing it. Yeah, certainly I feel that way too. I’m still in my full-time job as a CPA.

And when somebody asks me what you do, it’s hard not to say, oh, I’m an accountant. Oh, I’m a CPA because I don’t really know why it’s just so ingrained in this, we spent so much time acquiring this credential. And so we just, we want to share that, but it’s less popular to say, oh, I’m a real estate investor or go into that for some reason.

I think it’s the way we’re just brought up. Would you agree? Yeah, because it’s like 2021 now, right? If you’re an entrepreneur on your LinkedIn profile, we all know you don’t have a job, you can’t find a job, you’re unemployed and by having that professional title, society gets you a certain amount of notoriety.

I was thinking the other day, I was watching a commercial on senior housing and I was imagining if I was really old, what would we talk about? But we talk about how you know Jerry over there with Jerry was the doctor or Barry was the engineer, so much of it is predicated on your titles of your occupation. And when you get to a search important, you give that up, most people get to that stage where they are financially free. They don’t give a rip anymore because they’re FII and they don’t live by normal society kind of values at that point.

They’re just titles and knots. Yeah. And it’s interesting, if you traveled to other countries, they’re more defined by their family. So they talk about their family name, but in America it’s we’re identified by our occupations and it’s just a different, different way people identify themselves for sure.

These days, I’m kinda like you know what, I am, what I am. I don’t care who you are. It seems funny, but it’s like what car do you drive? What’s your net worth? That’s all that really matters. I know that sounds very shallow. But, as a real estate investor, you need to stop.

You’re getting off the beaten path and we just stop caring what other people think about you. And we could certainly dedicate the whole show to that, certainly. But today, specifically again, the counterintuitive wealth rules that the rich follow. Before we even dive into what these rules are, why did you outline this?

Why did you basically discover this so early in life, like how did you stumble upon these wealth rules? Yeah, so I went out, bought a rental property, and got around 2015. I had 11 of these rentals and at this point I just was doing it all by myself. Around 2015 was when I finally got out of my shell and started to interact and network with other pure passive high net worth investors.

And for me, it was a game changer because now I started to really get a glimpse of what the high net worth folks do. And what I realized is a lot of what they do is very counterintuitive to what we’re all taught right by our parents, school workers, friends. And the crazy thing is like a lot of these things work.

They’re very attainable. It’s not something that anybody can’t do, but there are certain financial dogma out there that totally tells us it’s the wrong thing. For example, not going into all this debt, getting whole life insurance or buying a house to live in. We can talk in more detail about these things.

Another example is like the wealthy don’t do these thinking retirement accounts, that’s for suckers, it’s like in the first year that you’re like stop, I can’t take money on a retirement. That’s an absolute sin. My friends and family. But I’m just saying, Hey man, like that’s what the wealthy do. I just figure out what the wealthy do and take the best practices and make sure that it’s logical from a numbers perspective. And I just go with it. Yeah, you’ve figured out what they do, and then you just copy it. It’s not like you’re reinventing the wheel, you’re just copying and pasting what works.

So let’s dive into that wealth rule that the rich follow that is counterintuitive to our culture. You mentioned on your website, don’t buy a home to live in. Okay. Can you unpack that? Because that’s certainly counterintuitive, let’s use the art type of the young professional.

This is who it really hurts. A house to me is a kind of a financial drag on your finances. You put this big lump sum down payment into a house and it doesn’t really grow for you. Conventional financial wisdom will say you’re putting money into this house and its growing equity.

Yeah, you could put it into five houses, right? And the crazy thing is that it’s you paying money for the mortgage and putting your heart, sweat, and tears and sweat equity into there. You have five families paying this stuff for you, putting their sweat equity into your wealth building. And that’s the big difference.

It comes down to paradigm shifts, right? Most people listen, most people in the water are really bad with their finances and can’t seem to save money. Sometimes it has to do with their saving skills, just basic personal finances and budgets, other times, it’s that they just, quite frankly, don’t make enough money.

And I’m speaking more towards the higher paid professionals out there, you guys make a good salary. You guys are living in a different paradigm than most of America and most of America, if you give them $10, they’re going to spend 11. They are irresponsible from a financial perspective. And not to say and not to cast any judgment or anything like that. But for those people, certain sets of rules apply. And this is where Susie Orman and Dave Ramsey’s. I don’t like their advice, but their advice is good for this subset of people that aren’t, haven’t really got a grasp on their basic finances.

So for those types of people, a house is a forced savings account, you put money into it. And it gets their grubby hands off a bear from spending it and that’s the benefit to that. But if you’re like, a lot of my clients, they are that diligent savers or the max out, their 401k guys, they save at least $30- $40,000 a year.

Now these are the different people on the other side of this paradigm that should go on the offense and invest money in assets, as opposed to just sink it down into their house. You mentioned a valuable term there often. It’s a difference between defense and offense. There’s two ways to pay money, right?

You can either go on the defense and try to save and cut your life back, which works for a lot of people who are, high thrill or they just want, they don’t have a lot of discipline, but if you want to truly get wealthy, you have to play more offensive, which is focusing more on income than just cutting back.

Tying it back to don’t buy your home. Do you believe that just because it’s a way for you to just tie up all this money without producing income. What’s the exact reasoning why maybe a 22 something that 20 something that just got a high paying job. Why should they not go buy their own home?

It just comes down to numbers, right? I’m like all right, show me how the numbers grow by you sinking your money into your house, right? So just typically real estate goes up and appreciates, right? And I think that’s why it’s such a forgiving asset class, you take that same money and you go plunk it down in real estate, properties or syndications and you show me what’s in the five, 10 year picture. How that money grows. The numbers don’t lie here. That’s all it is. Some people will say renting is like throwing money down the tube. That’s the biggest bunch of baloney I’ve ever heard. Yes, myopically it is.

But what if you’re taking that money and you’re making way more money on the side and rentals or syndications, you need to look at the bigger picture. I try to model the way. I rent my net worth is pretty decent and I have a sort of a feeling where I don’t think people should buy their primary residence unless a certain net worth is at least two times.

So the homes about their net worth needs to be two times the home’s value. That’s what you’re saying, right? So if they’re buying a $700,000 house, their net worth better be, at 1.4 or to me, it should be three times or more, but right. At that point, then you can start, like a lot of this wealth building in the beginning is the most critical stage when the net worth is under a quarter million or under a million dollars.

You can’t be screwing around and doing these like bad financial things, like buying a house. But once you get to a certain tipping point and it’s different for everybody, once you’ve hit that sort of almost escape velocity. Now you can take your foot off the pedal and start drinking some caviar, champagne, and buy a house to live in or buy a nice car.

That’s the beautiful thing. Go, Penn, buy a nice car. If you have the cash flow to support it. And you’re already past that critical point. It’s all about rate of return and rate of return is very important, especially early in your career because you don’t have a lot of capital to work with. So you need a higher rate of return to make the same amount of money than say a very wealthy person would. So what you’re saying is instead of plopping down 30, 50, a hundred thousand dollars for a down payment, deploy that in other cash flowing assets. And let’s say you’re making $2,000 a month from that.

Would the down payment, but then you’re paying 700 and rent while your nets 1300. Is that kind of what you’re saying? That’s the logic, but then we run into, I coach and counsel a lot of folks, and eventually what it comes down to is the people that are listening to the podcast, understand what we’re talking about.

They get it, but they cannot convey and communicate this to their spouse, the anchor, and they cannot effectively bead and manage and, take their family to where they want to be if that’s their goal , maybe that’s just the, the stoic within me, the obstacle is the way you got go through this and you can’t just, buy things that you want on a whim, like a house.

You have to do what is necessary to get to where you’re at and if you’re under a million dollars net worth, you’re broke and that was a derogatory term, but like you got to do stuff that you probably don’t want to do to get to a certain point to be financially free, if that’s what you truly want.

Yeah. You have to think counter-intuitively about what we’re talking about on the show here. So the second pillar that you mentioned in one of your online resources is you don’t buy mutual funds or other wall street products. So you’re singling out an entire type of investing here. Like we’re talking stocks, ETFs, bonds.

And so why do you hold that position? Because that’s very current counterintuitive. Yeah. When I started investing, I was making maybe 20, 30, or 20 to 30% returns on my money, just with a simple rental property. People don’t believe me. They can go to simple classic housel.com/returns, check out the video on the whole math.

But just go with me on podcasts land and here I am in my early twenties and I. Why am I need to put my money in this, like supposedly like stock market, for what case mutual fund stuff, when I’m only making eight to 10% and it goes up and down like a freaking rollercoaster, for me, it was like, no clear picture than that. Why the heck would I want to do that? If I just do take a little due diligence and yeah, sure. I’m getting off the beaten path, but it’s not that hard. It’s simple, passive at some point, and I can make much higher returns by doing this on my own. Why would I not want to do that?

And then I started to uncover that the whole system is engineered to keep us investing in that garbage before one K’s weren’t around earlier than the eight, 1980s, it was an engineered thing. Yes. It was to get people to actually save their money. The people on that side of the.

But it was a way for all these mutual fund companies like Fidelity or Vanguard or Charles Schwab’s to get it that all this money is sitting on the sidelines from the average Joe. Joe wasn’t able to get involved in the stock market, but now all these companies are able to get at these people’s money and they take their money at huge hidden fees and carry interest.

And what the average person doesn’t realize is just getting robbed in their sleep, getting this stuff, and nothing is not clear. I’m only making eight to 10% of that stuff. And I’m making such a bigger return than doing it on my own. Where did my money go? went to those big buildings and went to these high salaries for all these Ivy league grads who work in these ivory towers.

If you want that stuff in, you’re okay with those returning to school. But I realized, that the man behind the curtain, the wizard of Oz, referenced that it’s, this whole system is engineered to keep us in this. Because if everybody said what I’m preaching, go buy a handful of rentals and eventually get involved in syndications.

Most people are able to get financially free in less than 10 years if they make a halfway decent salary. At that point Ooh, what choose to go to work in a cooler, build our bridges, who would play doctor for us? Who would push the government paper up. Nobody would write.

Maybe some, but I wouldn’t. Yeah it’s sickening when you think about it that way that there are things in place to get people to do things for long decades, and then you eventually retire underwhelmed at what you’ve built your life towards. Yes. What frustrates me is like, there’s so much here’s some of the dogma that kind of prevents us all to do this right.

And it’s built in grading society. Let alone all the marketing, which you pay for as an investor comes out and hidden fees, part of the operating budget of the mutual fund or the broker. But people say you don’t want to take money out of your retirement. That’s a sin.

You can’t do that. You’re not, you can’t do that. But when I did. To me, it made sense. I’m going to take my money out, but I’m not going to be a bonehead and go buy a car or a jet ski with it. I’m going to keep putting it towards long-term assets that I don’t intend to use for a while.

I’m not taking the money out. So you can call it retirement money or not. It’s still my, my, my asset column. And then they call like, when you take money out, they call it like a penalty, 10% penalty. But to me, I was like, If I can recoup that 10% penalty in six months. And after that, it’s all gravy. Why the heck wouldn’t I want to do this.

Yeah. And so you were basically taking money out of your 401k and investing into real estate. When you discovered this, did you withdraw all your money from your 401k? I actually didn’t do this for quite a while. I was just, I was worse off than probably some of the listeners. I was always taught.

You never touch your retirement funds, which is complete bullshit. So it took me, I had bought several renters rentals up until that point until I finally pulled the plug on the retirement funds. I wish I would have done it a lot sooner, I was a good boy. I was like, you don’t do that type of stuff. You don’t pull your retirement fund and take a 10% penalty, like that’s just stuff. You’re not conditioned to. And yeah, I’m the person that preaches, do you run your numbers? I’m the one that saw the numbers, but I didn’t do it for such a long time. So I get it.

I know how hard it is for people to get off the beaten path and think alternatively, but, think for yourself, do the numbers yourself, that numbers don’t. And on the positive side, if you’re a person who has worked for 10, 20, 30 years by now, and you have a sizeable 401k balance, go ahead and try to tap into that through a self-directed IRA, certain options that, I’m not qualified to speak on, but there are ways to tap into those funds and diverted and.

Real estate or syndications like you’re involved in to get that higher return. So if you’re earning eight to 10, maybe you can get 20 to 30. So yeah. Yeah. Let’s talk about that a little bit. Like I think one thing is like getting out of the retail types of options. So all the analogy I like to use is when you’re investing in these brokerages, it’s like the cafeteria in high school or at least at my high school.

You have, you’re stuck with the school lunch. You’ve got only the options that they have and typically it’s crappy food and it was really expensive. But what do you do when you get your off campus pass? Which is synonymous with investing outside of these brokerages, investing in CrossFit real estate on your own in a year out there, you got your car.

You’re going out to Burger King and McDonald’s KFC, right? It’s cheaper food. It tastes better. The one thing about this, an analogy where it breaks down is it’s not healthy. I think people get the analogy, right? Like when you get out of your money, out of that retirement fund stuff out of the mutual fund stuff, now you can go invest in actually good investments or people aren’t robbing you blind with all fees and stuff like that.

So you’re going from a retail investment. So non retail, it’s like people that buy stuff at sex. It was like, I got a shirt there for 34 bucks. Cause I had a gift certificate, but I can get that same shirt elsewhere on Amazon for five bucks. It’s crazy why anybody shops there, but that’s how most people invest and that’s how a lot of people shop.

But now we’re talking about all right, so you can invest the money through a self-directed retirement system. So yeah, you could still keep it in the qualified retirement plan, retirement money. But invest in things outside the garbage cafeteria investments, such as real estate. But one thing I help clients is that every situation is different.

So a retirement plan typically is not the way to go. Because when you start investing in larger deals, you can get the tax benefits of passive activity losses. You can’t use the passive activity losses to offset your passive income or your passive or your ordinary. Which is a big strategy for the high net worth high income earners.

So when you’re investing in this retirement plan construct, for a lot of those guys, the best plan is to get it out of there and invest cash. So you can take advantage of the tax benefits of. Right on. Yeah. Yeah. Thanks for sharing that. And back to your analogy, I just want to add, where the marketing dollars are, that’s where most people will be.

Okay. So like the fidelity, the Vanguards, they have the biggest marketing budgets. And so that’s where most people invest. If you take, for example, in the grocery store, But the biggest food companies have the largest marketing budgets. So that’s where most people will shop. It doesn’t mean it’s the best food for you, or it’s the best investment product for you.

It’s just where those companies have invested. So once you get out of that realm and you can see the horizon, the, all your options as they are, then you start to realize like what a lie you’ve been sold on, this whole time. So it’s pretty, I don’t. Marketing kind of makes it where it’s like really this whole investing thing is really complicated, right?

To scare the crap out of you. And I tell people, investing is not that hard, especially when it’s real estate, right? Where are you investing in a commodity, such as a house that people rent it simple, passive cash flow, but like these brokerages and all the investing dogma make tries, they try and make this stuff really complicated.

And investing in stocks is complicated. My opinion, which is why you don’t. And th and I think that’s where a lot of people get intimidated, right? They’re like, oh, I don’t understand math or understand the stock stuff. So I’m just going to give it to the guy in the suit that seems to know what the heck he’s doing.

And that’s exactly what they want. So I think my message is like, Hey guys, I think that’s complicated, right? Don’t get bamboozled into thinking. You need to go with these seemingly smart people. Like your financial planner just gets paid off. I haven’t found one financial planner that actually has made their wealth outside of selling.

People are salesmen. Actually I have, and they invest in real estate, hit backdoor. Yeah, I once heard that the average salary for a financial planner is 70 or 80,000, but yet we’re putting all of our eggs in one basket for them to teach us how to get rich. And it just doesn’t make sense.

So definitely you have to follow who you are. You have to watch who you are, following who you’re getting your advice from. And if you’re getting advice from somebody who is making money off you via commissions, that’s probably a bad sign. And that’s what we see a lot in the wall street in those wall street products.

So that’s why we caution you. Okay. 100%, you only take financial advice to people who are not financially free. Unfortunately, this is not your parents. This is not your coworkers, especially the coworker that’s been there for 32 years. You don’t want to take that financial advice from that sucker.

He’s been stuck there. And sometimes this can carry you forward to CPAs lawyers, right? Bobby should have said the whole disclaimer, or we’re not CPAs are not lawyers, but look, I’ve left my day job during this stuff and figured this stuff out. A lot of CPS and a lot of lawyers, they fit.

They’re still stuck in the day job. They’re still working trading time for them. There’s very few financial professionals that have actually done so. Yeah, totally. And CPAs, they know the tax rules, but then they keep earning money the wrong way. And that is heavily taxed. The lawyers know the legal rules, but then they don’t, take advantage of them or implement them.

So it’s You have to really be humble and maybe not come from that type of background to achieve wealth. Because if you know the tax rules up and down, or the law up and down, sometimes you just take it for granted and you don’t use it to get wealthy. Definitely agree with that.

Let’s get to the final point of this, the final counterintuitive way that the rich get wealthy. I want to talk about taxes. So you’re saying that generally speaking, the rich don’t pay taxes. I assume they may pay some taxes, but they don’t pay as high of a percentage in taxes as, for example, an employee or a self-employed person.

Why is that? And how do they do that? Yeah. They’re investing in real estate as the primary weapon to lower their taxes. So real estate is cool because it’s the one asset class out there that you can deduct the price of the improvement over, if you have a rental property at 27 years, so you can take that paper loss or a Phantom loss off of your passive.

Which is cool when you put this on steroids in larger deals that can do a cost segregation which kind of itemizes all the pieces of the building. At the end of it, you can deduct a third of the building value in the first year, right? Which now gives investors a huge amount of passive losses to now play different levers on their taxes.

Passive losses can be used to offset passive. Often, that more than offsets the income for that year, but also can create a surplus, a loss, which is a good thing. Now we’ve worked with clients to, like a lot of people will, we might implement, you’ll see professional status, which has a lot of things, moving parts with them. We’re not going to get into it, but now you can possibly unlock the passive losses to lower your ordinary. And that’s just one strategy, right? And there’s different types of deals you can go in, basically you’re going and you’re following the incentives that the IRS has put into the tax code.

The government wants us to invest our money and put our money in certain places. It’s our job. And with the help of our professionals to figure what those are, and also the best practices from our community or mastermind. Like this is what the wealthy do, they figure out what these things that the IRS wants us to invest in, put our money there and we can drive our adjusted gross income down or get different tax credits. People want to go and look at my taxes. They can go to simple passive cashflow.com/tax and see how much I’ve been paying the last several years every year. Some people will think that’s messed up, right?

To me, I’m just doing what the government wants me to do and you know what, and I’m the one putting my money into a lot of these apartment deals for workforce housing. This is what the government wants, right? We have no government housing for this type of stuff. They want investors such as myself to put money into this stuff.

And therefore I get great tax benefits from it. Whereas if you’re somebody who just puts your money into stocks, mutual funds, you’re going to have to pay taxes on that because you’re not investing with how the government wants you to do it. Everybody needs to pull their weight. If you don’t give, not putting your money in the right stuff that they want you to do, then you got to pay taxes, bro.

And unfortunately it’s the people, the hiking comparators that are getting killed by this stuff. It’s not the wealthy, it’s not the low, the lower end. It’s the shrinking middle-class. So they’re going to be killed with this stuff because they’re not following the breadcrumbs. Yeah. It’s surprising that more people don’t talk about taxes and they.

They get their tax return and they pay what it says on it. And they don’t really think about how to lower that because it’s just become so big a part of our life. And, if you think about a hundred years ago, there wasn’t even an income tax a little over a hundred years ago. So now we’ve allowed the government to step in and encroach so much.

But for wise investors like you who know how to not cheat the system, legally take advantage of it then. You’re just going to be in the top five, three, 5% of people that pay little to no tax relative to their income. So it’s very powerful. If you can save 40%, which is, some people pay 40% taxes.

If you can save that, then that’s just more, you can circulate back into investment. So you just. Yeah, and this is like going out to the higher income earners and the higher net worth people, had a case where, a doctor wanted to like, they make pretty high salaries, like $600,000 AGI.

And by doing a few maneuvers, real estate professional status coming into some deals with larger bonus losses, we were able to lower them from 600 grand down to 400. I’m just saying, using these round numbers. And that affects them, saves them a hundred grand yet they’re wasting their time trying to learn some kind of short-term rental strategy where the best they could make $5,000, $10,000 a year.

And this is, I think, where people like they get confused. Because they see all these investing strategies. But they don’t really understand the high level. What’s really going to move the needle? What’s the 80 20 here? So for higher income owners, it’s more for. If the, exactly how you said if we could just move on from 600 grand to 400 grand, we just sheltered, we just saved maybe a hundred thousand dollars of taxes right there.

Who cares if they would’ve had 10 rental properties or 20 rental properties, in fact, right? Like it’s more kind of what moves the needle in terms of dollars and what your debt at the end of the year. And this is how the game transitions from a lower net worth investor to a higher net worth investor beyond.

Yeah. And I know you focus a lot towards you’re working highly paid professionals. There’s certain things that people need to focus on in different parts of their career. For example, if you make 50,000 a year, try to get that up. Obviously if you’re making 600,000 a year, you need to focus on getting that up, but also focusing on getting your tax down.

So there’s different goals that you need to take stock of as an individual. But I think the highest. Priority, you would probably agree. This economic independence is getting your rate of return really high and getting your net worth to that million plus mark to where you can really start to make massive moves.

Like things really start to move. And these strategies really start to make sense once your net worth goes over half a million. If you’re under there, do what I did. When I graduated college, I didn’t have one. I didn’t have very much money. And I had to just buy rental properties.

So from 2009 to 2015, I was just picking up these trenches on boats, myself. Yeah. So again, we’re talking about different advice for different wrongs, right? So to me like the split is anywhere from under half a million dollars to over half a million dollars now. If you’re over a half, a million dollars net worth, like you said, a lot more of it is taxes.

Of course, you still have to invest in the right assets. But when you’re below that, that’s where I was between 2009 to 2015. I had a good paying job, but I didn’t have any net worth at the time. So what did I do? I just picked up rentals, diligently and saved my money. I was able to accelerate through this pretty quickly because I was able to save anywhere from 50 to $80,000 for my day. I was an extreme saver, this is where I just picked up assets. And one turns around though after the next. And I think a lot of people don’t realize that wealth building isn’t a get rich quick thing. From 2009 to 2015, that was a long freaking time.

And, people expect to just go to the big stuff and skip over that. The crazy thing about this, like real estate investing and wealth building is it goes exponential. But yeah, you got to put in the effort in the beginning and a lot of it is just building your network up slowly.

And then at some point it takes. Yeah, it’s that compound effect, certainly. For example, you read books like the slight edge or the compound effect, and they talk about how, get up a little bit earlier one day or go to the gym one day or read 10 pages of a nonfiction book. You’re not going to see the impact of that.

Day, month, even year, but you are going to see that impact in five to seven to 10 years, like you saw in your financial life, right? In the beginning, this is all new to you, right? You don’t, you definitely don’t trust it. So you go buy a rental property. But after that, you’ve got to get another fine.

All your other lazy equity is, and that could be in your primary residence. So take a heat lock, get a cash flow refinance, deploy the funds for. Did money in your retirement funds, put that to good work or just, you’re just sitting on cash. Once you’ve got proof of concept to me, that’s where you got to invest more heavily and get more involved.

Because a classic example is like a guy invests $150,000 and he’s like, why am I not doing financial freedom? Do you need to invest more? This is not magic, right? It’s just a certain rate of return times how much money you invest. The rate of return doesn’t go up and down very much, unless you want to take a lot of risk, which I don’t recommend.

Therefore you just have to invest more and if you don’t have the money, then you have to save more and just take more time. But at some point you gotta start like in your mind, I be like pulling the goalie, or taking money out of the 401k. Yeah, absolutely. There’s hope for those people who have bought into the traditional beliefs of buying your home to invest in wall street products because you can always get those out through a self-directed IRA, simply cashing out your retirement account, doing a heloc on the personal residence.

The world’s financial, world’s pretty forgiving in that you can tap into these lazy equity items that you mentioned. That’s a great term for it. Lazy equity and turn it into high producing equity for you. Yeah there’s sorts of things that are reversible, that I would recommend for new people that are faint of heart.

The heloc or taking loans for your 401k or taking withdrawals from your Roth, IRA, your contribution. So you can take out tax-free because you’ve already paid your taxes and you can take that penalty fruit. So do that first, but once you’ve got proof of concept, now you need to start to look at the marquee of reversible things.

Like maybe you have a rental property, maybe you have a primary residence that you should unload, or maybe you just want to keep living there. So you do a cash out refinance. How much refinances you pay fees for, but it probably will make sense to strip out the equity and now invest it elsewhere.

Other irreversible things include taking money out of your 401k or retirement, but you can’t really put it back. You can, but only at a certain pace. And I don’t know why you want to put any more money into it once you’re taking it out. To me, it makes no sense. But you know that those are the two wrongs.

If this is all new to you, focus on the reversible. And then once you’ve got proof of concept, now you have to go all in on this stuff. Yeah. And that’s a great way to wrap it up here, but first before we let you go lane I want to introduce the last portion of our show, which is the triple threat.

And it’s the same three questions I ask each guest. So the first one is what has been the app or resource that has been the biggest game changer for your business? I like to go to docs. I dunno, Gmail. It’s just nothing special I use, yeah. Those are great tools for sure. I use them every day.

The second question is what has been the biggest lesson for you in the last year and why do you think that happened? I guess, like going to the pandemic, we showed how multifamily apartments survive this stuff. It’s a basic necessity. And it I didn’t, I was a little worried in April, may of 2020, how all this stuff would happen. I’ve ever been through it and done it before. And I was worried how collections would go, but collections came pretty well and occupancy did drop maybe a few percent points, at the end of the day, we still had cash flow.

If we keep, more than 50, 60% of the people have heads and beds, so work rules. No, I’m probably even more confident in the strategy of going after workforce housing, because, at the end of the day, people need a place to live. Population is going up, immigration is up and, it’s the shrinking middle-class or falling back to lower middle-class into these more value based upon housing options.

It’s what’s more in demand. Yeah, sure. There’s more cool ways to make money and like hotels or hospitality type of stuff. But I think we’re all reminded why that stuff is more discretionary spending and it gets killed in situations like this. Yeah. So absolutely you went through COVID, but you just have to trust in your assets, trust in your underwriting and carry through that will carry you through the storm for sure.

Question number three is our podcast is all about helping others achieve freedom with real estate investing, whether that’s financial lifestyle or otherwise. So what does freedom mean to you? Freedom is to do what you want, where you want with me. Why? I think something I’ve learned is when there’s kind of two people going through life and most people are the people who are trading their time for money.

They go to work every day. And everything is when they go home, they’re resting, recovering, going back to work, treating their time. Once again, until you’ve reached that point of real retirement. Many people retire, but they don’t have enough money at that point.

They’re just eating off their pile of cash. But people who’ve achieved that escape velocity, that critical mass to have enough money that regenerates and grows, whether they do anything or not, those people have truly gotten to that cog scenario. And for people finally, lucky enough to get to that point before the age of normal retirement age, those people get to a point in life that not many people get where they get the options to design their lifestyle and figure out what impact they want to make in the world if that’s what they so choose. To me in your life, really doesn’t start a show. You can like not having to go to a day job every day.

That’s definitely true for me. Your life doesn’t really begin until you have ultimate choice over what you do with your time. I don’t know if a lot of people would agree with that. Maybe you would like your job or otherwise, but I think it’s definitely something that we should all strive for and it should be in the back of our mind at all times too.

Because that’s how we’re going to achieve our higher purpose. Our higher calling is when we have choices, we can over time. Nowadays I understand why old people are grumpy, but they don’t have to put up with all this type of nonsense. People who are financially free, they can say no.

And they do say a lot of things that they don’t want to do. And that doesn’t really meet their calling and is not aligned with their values. And great things happen when you can say no most of the time. That’s a good way to end it. This has been a great episode on the counterintuitive ways that the rich get that way. I have appreciated your time and your expertise Lane, and I hope the listeners got a lot out of this episode. Where can people learn more about you if they are interested? I know that. That you mentioned a website simplepassivecashflow.com I believe. Yeah. They can check out my podcast: simple, passive cash flow passive real estate investing. In the beginning, I would talk a lot about rental real estate. But as I became an accredited investor, the topics of kind of change to syndications taxes, that type of stuff, infinite banking, or they can check on my website, simplepassivecashflow.com. Thanks again and hope you have the rest of a good day and hopefully your kid doesn’t give you too much trouble. Thanks Lane.

Is Stock Investing Still Worth It, TODAY?

What’s up folks! And we are gonna be talking about all the latest stuff that’s been happening this week. We haven’t noticed your guys’ stocks took a crap on me under, under hand, and a lot of wealthy people who don’t invest in that Kaeni old stock market thing. Don’t care. I mean, I kind of look at it day to day and I kind of just wanna stay informed.

So I don’t look like, you know, the rich uncle who just doesn’t know what the Dow is doing. But I’ll be honest. I frankly don’t care very much because all my money is in hard real estate or small businesses. I don’t care what’s happening with the stock market, partly because I don’t believe in it. It’s all this made up money and what’s been happening is, you know, since the pandemic, all, all this fake money got pumped into the system through a thing called quantitative easing and now quantitative tightening the opposite of is happening. Where there’s all this inflation going on and the Fed and the politicians in Congress need to find a way to cool it down. So what do they do? They start to raise the interest rates, which should cool down the inflation.

So let’s recap, right? What’s been happening over the last several months. What’s supposedly the thing? That’s keeping people up at night, you’ve got the Ukraine war, a terrible thing that’s happening, but that is bringing the gas prices up. And that’s one thing now I honestly don’t really feel like, yeah, sure.

Lots of people are paying double the amount in terms of gas, but really how much is that part of people’s personal spending budget? Is that really gonna happen? People from taking their family vacations because their gas tank costs an extra 50 bucks one way in coming back. I don’t think so. Uh, next thing is the supply chain, which I think is a little bit of a hoax, right?

It’s just kind of one of those things where it’s slowed down in China and has lowered the speed to things we expect. Like tomorrow is not taking a few weeks and this kind of range from microchips all the way to furniture, to bigger goods to manufacture other products. Such as real estate, but here’s the big question.

And I think this has been looming around us, are we in a recession, is a recession coming. Now, when I talk to most unsophisticated investors out there, they are always, always thinking the recession is coming tomorrow. Maybe I will, if that’s the case, I’m going to just sit with my money and not do anything, which is to me a.

Right. Sophisticated investors know that you have to be in the game somehow, especially today, right? Where inflation is 9%. If you don’t do anything, your money will be losing 9% of its buying power every year. In other words, if you don’t do anything, you will lose 9% of your money every year. So just sitting on your cash, which means having the equity, sitting in your house as home.

Or just in some kind of bond or even some lower stocks or even some growth stocks. To me, it’s untapped lazy equity that should be put into cash flowing assets. Ideally, that’s doing value. Add where you can increase the value of the property to not just rely on market appreciation, but grab your own fate in your own hand and do some force appreciation there.

We talk about other, uh, videos on this topic, check it out. You know, we talk a lot about value, add real estate. But today I am mainly talking about the economy. So we’ll get back to that. No one thing I wanted to mention about inflation it’s right around 9%. Let’s just go with that. It ranges and there’s some people out there saying that it may be even 10 to 15% plus because the government is sort of sandbagging that number to make themselves look better.

Now, normally inflation is paid around two to three. so we could probably argue that from baseline it’s around a plus 6% at this point. Now, I’m gonna introduce this idea of relativity, right? So if we’re kind of a plus 6% from normal baseline, where, where are we at in terms of housing prices? Well, housing prices are known to go up plus 3% more in nicer areas, low cap markets, like Seattle, California, Hawaii, New York, and a little slower in the boring flyover states, such as Birmingham, Atlanta, and Annapolis, places like that.

Now let’s just for simplistic purposes. Let’s just call it 3% and 3% mimics again, what inflation should be. So this is why I’m not a big fan of buying a house to live in and calling it your investment. Cuz all it is doing is going up with the pace of inflation in this case is we’re calling it 3%.

Now the prices have gone up quite a bit since then. You know, you one could argue that it’s probably going up maybe 6% every year, maybe even seven, but let’s just go with six for this purpose from baseline, which is 3%, 6% is a plus 3% increase. But where inflation is at, inflation is going a lot higher than where the housing prices are at now.

One might be able to take the idea that. You know, the housing market is lagging inflation, and we could be in a recessionary environment at this point now, except inflation is just bringing all this money in and rising all tides. And it’s all relative, right? If the inflation is 9% and the housing prices are lagging just behind there at 6%, the housing prices are kind of weak and in a way, again, Could be in a recession at this point already.

Now you’re gonna hear a lot of this type of talk in YouTube and news articles. It’s very different from the stuff I’ve been hearing from different, real economic reports out there where they actually look at the job support. And right now jobs and underemployment are doing pretty well right now.

Relatively speaking. So, what is the Fed doing? The Fed is kind of mandated to keep inflation under control as one of their main things. And that is their main focus at this point. Now with unemployment doing pretty well and, you know, the job market doing pretty well. That’s their main focus is inflation. And again, how are they doing?

What are they doing to cool this off, but increase the interest rates. Now one thing to look at whether we go into a recession or not, or whether we’re in a recession already, but this concept of, you know, things kind of move up and down, up and down, it’s a natural thing. And when you, this is why we tell people to invest in real estate that has cash flows or things that have cash flow because you ride these ways and it’s always a good time to be buying.

And you don’t need to worry about timing the market, but because you can’t, you should be always buying things that make sense and cash. On a routine basis. Ideally monthly. Now the big question, are we coming into a hard landing recession or a soft landing recession? We know we’re kind of in a bear market at this point.

Maybe call it another week or two of these hard minus 300, 400 point days in the Dow of more red and blood in the streets. And it’ll be official more than likely, but don’t forget a real recession is known as two quarters of negative GDP. And I don’t think we’re gonna see anything dip below 0%. Right. I, what we’ve been seeing, especially in 2001 after the pandemic was great GDP growth, but what we’re going to be seeing is slowing growth, but it’s still growing.

And that’s the point I kind of wanna reiterate to everybody. but nevertheless, a lot of money is coming out of the stocks right now, as it was so freely going in when they were creating all this fake money. And this is why I’m not a big fan of the stock market. Get your money out of this system where money flows in and out arbitrarily.

And not really based on whether you’re making a sound investment or not, take your own fake in your own hands, buy real estate or start your own business or investment businesses that are actually based on either the net operating income or the ABI. How much income to the losses equates to how much profit something is making, as opposed to some random number based on somebody’s assessment of how a company should be doing now, why is the fed increase in the interest rates?

Well, my theory, and I think a lot of people will also agree with this, is that they are trying to pay for all these government programs that are coming in. I mean, how is she gonna pay for all these monkeypox vaccinations, but print, continue to print money. But at some point you’re gonna run inflation wild and that’s not good for politics, right.

People will start to blame it on the politicians and the fed eventually. And that’s not what they want to do, but it’s a tricky thing. Yes. They controlled inflation. Bring it back to two to 3%, which I think will take maybe about three to four years for them to really reign things down. Especially if they’re doing, you know, half a 0.3 quarter 0.1 quarter point.

Um, changes every so often, it’s gonna take a while to reign this inflation back in. But one thing that they are looking at real closely is the jobs numbers. If the jobs unemployment goal starts to uptick and gets above kind of where we’re at, or we’re traditionally hovering at, then that’s a point where they need to lay off of that quantitative tightening.

And they need to reign back how aggressively they’re increasing the interest rates. First thing, what we’ve done, we’ve traded some of the assets that we’re currently in contract to buy. We’re currently in a little bit of a fire’s market within a seller’s market that didn’t make any sense to you.

Basically, we were in an up trending market where it’s a seller’s market. It’s, um, hard to buy. It’s uh, you know, things are more and more expensive, but what happened there, you know, about a month ago when the interest rates really started to take off was a lot of these bigger institutional players pulled back from the market.

And these institutional players, especially in the commercial market world, really move markets. And if you guys trade stocks, you know, you little Robin hood people out there, the only time where the little players really, you know, moved the market was that whole game stop fiasco. But typically the institutional players are just moving so much volume that they influenced the market very heavily and, and greatly.

So what happened was a lot of these people buying these large apartments with these commercials. We pulled out these institutional professional investors buying these huge, huge properties. And what this did was create a little bit of VA vacuum. So if you were a smaller, medium size operator buying a hundred to 400 unit deals, there was a bit of a vacuum created and thus.

A little buyer’s market within the seller’s market. In general, me personally, I still was a little apprehensive and I just kind of want to watch things move out and we’ve been pretty active lately, so I wasn’t really involved, but I’m just kind of seeing this, um, sort of, so in there I’m still looking at deals, but you know, one particular property we ask for a bit of a trade, uh, to retrade it, which means the ask for a lower price.

So that’s another idea for you guys to work on. You gotta be careful sometimes because you can lose some faith when you start to re trade. But you know, that’s based on what’s happening out there in the market right now. And, you know, come right now. It’s about July, maybe not the case come past mid-July or right now it’s about June, probably not the case when we come to mid-July.

The other thing, refinance your assets. You might be kicking yourself saying that I could have refinanced at 3%. Now it’s 6% and that door is closed. Don’t worry. I would say, just make sure you’re refinancing. Get that liquidity out. Don’t be an unsophisticated investor, really think about the difference between that 3% that you’re staying there.

Interest rates are more than likely to go up, but more importantly, pull the liquidity out now and hold it. I think that’s a thing that a lot of investors don’t really think about. Anytime when things went wrong, it was because of a couple of things. First, the asset didn’t have cash flow. If you have cash flow, you can write out a recession.

And secondly, even if your cash flows, and even if your cash flow went a little bit negative, which is usually caused because you have to lower your rents to pay your debt service, maybe you’re going in. Not really that great of a deal that isn’t casual, very strong. But at this point you’re gonna need cash reserves to feed that beast.

And that cash reserves is the important thing that you can last this out, you know? So if you have an adequate cash flow property, you know, you own a little rental property that rents for a thousand dollars a month, then your mortgage is 300, $400,000 and you can pay your expenses after that. I think you’re.

But if you’re sitting right now with, after all 50% expense ratio expenses, you’re only cashing, maybe 50 bucks per door. I think you might be in a little bit of trouble. Should you have to drop your rents maybe 10 or 20%. Now, if you’re buying apartments now the different story, as opposed to rent, it’s more occupancy.

Right? Right now you might be 95% occupied, but maybe you might be good to do a little bit of sensitivity analysis in. You have to keep your rents a little bit right where it’s at or lower, but maybe your occupancy drops to 85, 80%. You guys run your numbers out there and kind of stress test it and use that stress test to really think, well, how much liquidity should I have?

Maybe I should have 50, a hundred thousand dollars lying around, which ideally you’d want to put into your infinite banking account. And just have it seasoned there and wait for this rainy day. But the point is, if you don’t have that money, pull it out via refinance. Don’t use a Helo because the helos can be pulled at any point.

And it probably will be pulled if there’s any kind of tumultuous times in the future. Speaking of tumultuous times, if you’re in crypto, be ready for that crypto winter coming. I had a few thousand dollars in block five. I pulled that a lot of people that I follow have been kind of Twittering this and Twittering that the co-founder of this is, you know, all these employees got like, um, fired from these companies.

I don’t know, I’m not a crypto guy, but I know enough to know which people who I trust within my inner circle to. I’m gonna pull what little money I have out of those things. And if I was in crypto, I would be kind of worried at this point and I’d be pulling it and trying to get into real hard assets.

That’s the thing I’ve been saying all along. I don’t know why people go to all these random fringy websites and defi markets probably cuz they think it’s cool and it’s. And they chase, you know, different staking yields for 12, 20%, but it’s times like this and when there’s uncertainty that it was just better off to go into real estate.

And yeah, sure. You’re making half of that. But again, when you’re investing in real estate, a lot of your gains are tax free. You can use the pass loft to offset that where you have to make maybe triple or quadruple that in the crypto to at the end of the day, keep the same thing. But those of you guys don’t do crypto and don’t do real estate.

Well, at the very least, if you’re that old 401k guy, um, and we’ll be doing videos and these, these guys in the future for you guys out there with, you know, a lot of you guys are the. You guys were told to invest in your 401k and get the company match. But now you’re in all these kinds of growth stocks. I’d be getting out of that stuff because those are the stuff that gets killed in these times when the money and the tide is going out of the stock market.

And because again, it was pumped up artificially during the pandemic, I’ll be going into value stocks, commodities, and the commodities that I’m talking about that I personally like. Real estate and real estate that covers the lower middle class workforce housing, not the really cool, sexy stuff, not the really low end stuff, because it’s hard to manage, but the nice B and C class assets in the middle that cater towards the most majority of America.

And it’s tough times. Come ahead. You know, the people living in the nice houses or the nice apartments, they’re gonna move to more of these workforce styles, housing or values. Or houses. And this is where as an investor, you want to catch these people as they fall, nothing happens well, you’re in real estate that will go up with the pace of inflation and you’re covered that way too.

So it’s kind of like heads, eye, win, tails, eye win, kind of a situation that you’re creating for yourself. But you know, if you’re in the stock market, to me, I think you’re gonna get killed. And it’s not really based on anything real, as I said before, but at the end of the day, you know, again, invest for cash flows.

So you can outright recession. Keep some cash at hand and do your sensitivity analysis on all your investments. You know, maybe 50, a hundred grand would be good for most people with a million, $2 million net worth and good luck out there. Don’t worry about it. You know, what are they always, what does your financial planner always tell you when you see a lot of red?

Well, don’t worry. You’re in it for the long haul. No, I think that’s a bunch of BS, but you. Just don’t make any irrational decisions. Think about this folks, find other people doing what you want to do. And I don’t know. I mean, maybe I’m a great example. I don’t care what happens in the stock market, because my money is in solid things, backed by a hard asset.

And that asset that I like to go into serves a common need that serves the lower middle class, the majority of America. It’s good for the economy. It’s good. Because people need it. It’s a good service. That’s not gonna be going around. And that’s just what I choose and helps you with your taxes. But we got a lot of other videos on that. If you guys have any questions, especially as the things come up and move as interest rates tick up even more drop any comments below we’ll try and get to it.

CHEAPER Third Party Collateral Loans for Your Infinite Banking

https://youtu.be/MT_8Kt0zEsg

What’s up investors now on today’s podcast. We’re going to be talking about a little bit of an advanced topic on infinite banking, a little trick that the folks in the HUI have found and have been utilizing to get a little bit better interest rates on the cash value portion of their life insurance. Now, if infinite banking is life insurance stuff, and there’s a lot of terms for this, a lot of marketable terms, you’ve got to love the financial industry with all these marketable terms on all these things. That’s essentially the same thing, whole life overfunded insurance. I know people don’t like their whole life. It’s different when you crank those insurance portions down and that’s where the commissions come. If you create these products with high insurance like how most people do and the commissions are going to be high.

 

But the way that people do it in our world to make the infinite banking way is very different. This is a new concept to you, and you’ve been turned off because you happen to read Dave Ramsey, which kind of goes over the whole idea in the wrong way. Go to simplepassivecashflow.com/bank.

 

Read that quick tutorial there. We even have a free e-course that most of you guys can bum rush through and take two to three hours. And then you’ll be IBC experts at this point, but check out that website and we have a lot of other free eCourses too, that you guys can access them all by joining up with our clubs, simplepassivecashflow.com/club.

 

Filling out that quick form there takes people most like one to two minutes to just do it. Before we get going with the show, just a little bit of a market update, something I’ve been seeing lately. We were talking about interest rates popping up since the start of the year.

 

And it’s creating a situation where a lot of these bigger players now, the bigger players, as you guys know, just like in the stock market, the big players move the markets. And in the real estate world, the big players, these big, large institutions invest people’s lazy, retirement money, just buying whatever, because that’s how they get paid.

 

They get paid when just deploying their silly capital around. A lot of these guys have taken the foot off the gas pedal a little bit with the interest rates going up. And I took the same position myself so I’m going to release a video to the people in the club. Again, you guys can get signed up for that insider access where we talked a little bit more in depth about what’s happening in the market.

 

And it wasn’t that uncertain for us. And we’ve got some other projects that don’t really need to get the debt and entire interest rates. So it was a nice little break from having to go to the normal sources for lending from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and community banks, but what this has created, and this is very counterintuitive because these large institutions have pulled back from the market has actually created a sort of buyer’s market, a vacuum in the seemingly uptick in the market.

 

Where there are some deals out for sale out there. Personally, I haven’t really been actively getting anything, but I’ve been looking, after realizing this. And so that’s what’s happening in the market by the time you guys are listening to this, maybe in July or whatever, it’s probably over, or this little vacuum is closing up.

 

And, eventually the institutions will come back and come back to play and because they need to deploy capital because that’s how they make money. And that should sicken you guys out there. These large institutions are spending and investing lazy retirement funds, pension funds. And all they gotta do is just deploy the money and that’s how they get paid.

 

They really don’t really care about buying the best assets out there. And that’s just how the financial system works. That’s just a little bit of what’s happening out there. Do you know if you guys are looking for properties to buy, maybe I dunno if this carries over to the residential, a little mom and pop rental properties or under 40 units.

 

Maybe you’re finding a bit of a buyer’s market there amongst the global sellers market because of the interest rates popping up and maybe just people are a little scared or about the affordability. Affordability is the ability to have a bigger mortgage payment because of interest rates or lower, but now they’re higher.

 

So the affordability goes down, but that’s, what’s happening in the commercial world. We talk a little bit more in depth. I sent out a newsletter to some folks that were impacted more about this. We actually are looking to trade Some deals because of this kind of phenomenon that’s happened and we’ll see how that goes.

 

But a little bit of a buyer’s market in a sellers market and the thought is from the industry experts, not all the YouTube influencers are the people trying to sell stuff , that 2022, 2023 is going to be a little bit of a slower uptick here. Won’t see rent growth 5, 10, 20% rent growth, but still growth.

 

And I think that’s the major thing. So if you’re underwriting your deals to assume for the normal 2 to 3% inflation. You should be fine. And I think some people are reading into that and maybe news centers are trying to sell headlines that call this recession in 2023, which to me, the recession is defined as negative GDP growth for two consecutive quarters. That’s just not going to be happening in my opinion. Again, in any case, you buy for cash flow. Doesn’t really matter if it’s up or down market, but anyway, here’s the show.

 

We’re going to be deep diving into a little bit more technical tactic here that a lot of the folks within the group have been uncovering and this technique is basically using your infinite banking policy, taking that cash value loan to go on, invest in it. But, they’re, you’re typically paying maybe 4 or 5% on that. But what if you could get something a little bit better than that just makes the arbitrage gap a little bit better. So I don’t know what the term for this is. And typically when there’s no term for these things, it’s probably a good technique that, or do it before it goes away.

 

Although I don’t think it’s going to be going away, helping me unpack this is Chris Miles from moneyripples.com. Hey Chris, how’s it going, man? Awesome. Lane, good to be here again. For those people, let’s start with a little basics, so we don’t leave anybody behind. I’ll let you define infinite banking and then I’ll take a stab at it because I think we define and explain a little bit differently.

 

So for some people who have never heard about this stuff, what is infinite banking, and then we’ll get into the cash value arbitrage. Yeah. If we strip away all the terms and all the cute little names that people try to give it. Because they got like infinite banking, be your own banker, cash flow banking, wealth formula banking, and everybody’s got their own little thing, simple, passive cash flow banking or whatever.

 

I call it max ROI when we do it, that’s all, basically what we’re doing is we’re taking life insurance, specifically, whole life insurance, not term insurance. Cause you can’t, there is no cash in term insurance. You have to die to get it. And we’re not talking about universal life because that doesn’t work as well either. We talk about using whole life insurance, something that’s boring in and of itself, but here’s the key thing is that if you get it designed where you put the lowest death benefit costs coming out and the highest amount of cash that you’re putting in what happens now, you create this tax-free supercharged savings account.

 

You have this money that’s able to build and grow tax-free just like a Roth IRA, but you don’t have all these 59 and a half rules. You don’t have to worry about the government changing the laws on you. You kept figuring what to do next. All this stuff is set and the money is accessible from day one where traditional whole life, the stuff that Dave Ramsey and Susie Orman hate.

 

We’re not talking about that. That traditional whole life is crap. Okay. That’s the stuff where you have to pay in tons and insurance costs tons of commissions and it’s not worth it. And so that’s what we’re really doing here is that we’re creating this tax-free super-charged savings account with this life insurance.

 

Yeah, there’s a death benefit, but we get this minimal death benefit needed to allow this X amount of cash to go in tax-free ,growing tax-free coming out tax-free. And here’s the coolest part. This is the part that we talk about all the time and kind of the topic today is that we’re taking this money and we’re not just letting it sit there and earning the five plus percent a year tax-free right.

 

That’s great. But that’s never going to get you to your freedom. The way to get to your freedom is you can take this money, leverage it. You can get a bank line of credit against it, whether it be through the insurance company or through a separate bank, you get a line of credit against the money that’s in this policy to then go and invest outside.

 

So you can take that money and use it for whatever you want. You can go and buy properties. You can go invest in the syndication. You can put your money in apartments or whatever it might be. You can take this money and invest it wherever you want. The cool thing is because you get this line of credit against it.

 

The money’s still earning tax-free dividends inside of the life insurance  and at the same time, you’re also earning money in your real estate. So you’re really, double-dipping on the same money that you’ve been saving up in the first place. You give an example, we’re going to talk about this here. There’s a line of credit you can get right now as low as 3%.

 

Now, if you’re earning 5% of your life insurance, you pay 3%. That means you just create arbitrage. Like the bank did when they loan you money, they make more off of you. You’re doing the same thing off the bank. Now you’re making a net 2%. Plus whatever, earning on that investment. So if that investment’s paying you 15% and you have 2%, now that’s 17%.

 

You’re now earning again with the money you’re already going to be investing anyway. But now we’re, instead of just pulling out savings, we’re using our life insurance to be the thing that funds those investments. Yeah. So there it is folks, but we’ll break it down a little bit slower for some of you guys who’ve missed it.

 

Maybe we could do a little role play here because I think that’s what this stuff is. It’s very different from what anybody else talks about. And, it takes a while for people to realize that it’s not crazy nonsense, but going back to just the general idea of infinite banking, you know what I’ve been explaining lately.

 

If you buy a house and you put a whole bunch of equity in there and it grows up. Essentially. It’s like the same thing, folks, right? You’re using this whole life policy like a heloc kind of house right now. You can take a loan off of your whole life insurance, and then use that as you see fit.

 

Just like if you have a house and you’re paying it down, but then you can take that equity out. Think of it as the same thing here now pays you interest. And the house in the house example, the house is obviously appreciating. And in the IBC example, the insurance policy is also appreciated too.

 

Now there are some like I think the biggest thing against this stuff is you’ll see a lot of YouTube videos or your whole life is a scam. I think Chris and I will both agree that yes, whole life insurance is the biggest scam if you are working with somebody, who’s creating this stuff with a high percentage, going to the commissions and the insurance part.

 

Now the key to this is using the bare minimum of life insurance. And the dirty little secret is this is how the insurance agents make this type of money if they ratchet up those commissions. So we’ve had a client we’ll, what we looked at is I think it was for like I don’t know if we can say the name, but I think it’s like Snoopy’s brand or something like that.

 

We’ll just go with that. But we looked at it and they’re like, yeah. We can’t, it doesn’t really work. And it’s oh we’ll look at what is the percent split of the life insurance portion. And it was a hundred percent the whole damn thing, and yes, but it’s done like that. It is a kind of a scam.

 

It’s not a good deal. And that’s exactly what they all are talking about. Dave Ramsey sees the armed men, but we’re talking about, yes, we’re talking about whole life. But we’re talking about it very differently. I don’t know. Maybe I can think of an analogy on the fly here. It’s saying, like all cars are dangerous, right?

 

Yeah. If you’re like driving around a little Plaza, Miata, it’s pretty freaking dangerous. But if you’ve got like a big truck, it’s not right. But people think in generalities, I think cars are dangerous in a way, same thing here, full life insurance. Don’t plump the type of specific type of design policy with a low insurance portion, which happens to have the lowest commissions for that agent, which is why they don’t want to do it for you.

 

That’s why you gotta work with people. Don’t care about money. It’s more bulk volume in a way, but that’s infinite banking in a nutshell. So we’ll go into an example here, right? So like I say, you have. So you’re putting in like a hundred grand a year for several years and you’ve built up a cash value of maybe 300,000.

 

And I want to go, and the way people will use this, the use case is to pull the money out and go into a deal. We put in 50, a hundred grand into the next deal, pay it down. As, you can make money from your day job and replenish a lot, or just take out the whole loan for forever. That’s another way of doing it.

 

When I do that, if I go and take the loan from my current insurance policy, it’s like the house loan in a way, I think I’m paying what, like 5% or something like  yep. And, but now you’re, let’s go into like, all right what does somebody need to do to not get this house alone, but go to a kind of party and be aftermarket.

 

Yeah. Once you have at least 50,000, $70,000 in cash value built up, you start to have more options open up to you. Most people just use the insurance company and that’s fine. Even some of the insurance companies, because they’ve lowered their guarantees. Some of them were loaning at 4% right now.

 

But at the same time like that, can, that sometimes can affect your dividends, right? How much you’re getting paid. So these third parties would allow you to do it and allow your money to keep growing, doing its thing, but you get a line of. That’s separate. Right now the lowest ones I’ve seen are either three or three and a quarter percent.

 

There’s a few banks like coastal states bank, which have a bottom floor rate of three and a quarter percent when I just set up for myself after I had coastal states bank as the bank court. I actually have them at 3%. So the cool thing is I can do the same thing I do with my life insurance, where I went to the lecturers company, asked for a loan. It would take about a week or so to get the loan from the insurance company, before the money’s in my actual bank account. But with these banks, you can actually have them set up electronically with your checking account where you can actually just do it yourself.

 

You don’t have to go through the company or a middleman to request it. You can actually go and click a button online and move the money over. And it’s there in a few days, which is great. Especially if you have a deal that’s coming, you’ve got to fund it in 48 hours or something much better to be able to click a button and say, Hey, let me call my insurance company and wait a week for it to come.

 

There could be worse things, but it’s nice when you have these third parties involved because, and it’s not just the banks, like I mentioned, sometimes your local. We’ll offer options too. It could be a credit union. It could be a bank. It really could just ask them, say, Hey listen, can I do, what’s called a collateralized line of credit specifically against my life insurance policy.

 

And some banks won’t touch those because they just don’t do it. They don’t specialize in it. They specialize. In other words, others will. I had somebody, a client who’s getting three and a quarter percent or three and three quarters percent through their local bank. And even though they could get a cheaper rate, they said, Hey, I love the convenience.

 

I can walk in, get to be able to pull the money out of my line of credit physically, or I can do it electronically. It’s just for ease. I’ll do that. There’s lots of different ways you can do it that most people just don’t realize and insurance agents are there too. They just don’t realize that you can go to banks and actually get these collateralized lines of credits and really be able to get a better return on your money, by doing that, by making more than what you’re having to pay on these loans.

 

Yeah. And an actuality, like it’s actually a good deal. Good loan to keep on the balance sheet for the bank. What do I know? I don’t want a bank, but the problem is a lot of these banks don’t know what the heck you’re talking about, especially when you’re working with the junior employee at the front facing, you’re going to have to get past that first or second round of bureaucratic thinkers.

 

And we were followers, but again, what was that terminology? , what were you asking again? So we can sound foolish. They walk into a bank , hopefully you’re wearing. Polo shirts that just come from the gym and walk in, like you just got off the golf course, yeah, just asking for that collateralized line of credit or secured line of credit is another name that the bankers might understand.

 

Most times when they do a secured line of credit, they take your savings account and they give you a line of credit against your savings. This is no different, just, that’s not what their institution it’s going to be with the insurance company. Here’s the key thing. It does need to be whole life. In many cases, it does have to be a whole life policy because whole life insurance is guaranteed where I know there’s several banks, including the ones I mentioned, like Bank Corp or coastal states bank.

 

They will not land on indexing universities. Which has become the hot topic since the market started booming again in the last decade plus, so index universal life is not guaranteed, even though they have a floor rate, they could still lose money because insurance costs are coming out so many banks will not give you a loan against that.

 

So you gotta be careful. Now. The cool thing is that you can use this in a variety of ways. If you’re just looking for that line of credit, it’s very easy to ask for another example of how you can use this if I had a client out in Minnesota. They wanted to buy an office, build a commercial building that they were leasing themselves, but they want to go and lease out different units essentially to turn into a rental property for themselves.

 

The total of the building with the build out was about 375,000. They had about 320,000 inside the life insurance. So they went to their local bank and said, listen, we could pay this in cash almost with our life insurance, but could we get a line of credit? Can we basically get a mortgage using this as collateral?

 

And the bank said, yes. And not only did they give him the loan, they gave him the build-out. So they gave him 375,000 more than they had there in their cash value in their life insurance. And they gave them such a nice rate, such a low rate that their payment was like 1800 bucks a month on a commercial building.

 

So they had excellent terms and made bank, no pun intended. They made bank easily. They made good profit on this rental cause they took one tenant and they made their mortgage payment. What’s really cool is a year and a half later after the build-out was done after they started renting out the property, they went back to the bank and said, Hey, can we have that lien taken off our life insurance?

 

Because they just put a lien on it. So they couldn’t touch the money that was there. That was the collateral. They took the lien off, kept the terms exactly the same. They still have the same monthly payment. They still had all of the same terms. But now that 300,000 plus I was in their life, insurance was freed up to use again.

 

However they had. So it actually gave him much better terms on their mortgage than they would’ve got just getting a normal commercial loan using the building as collateral. So there’s lots of different ways to use this more than we’ve talked about. I know you did a post on LinkedIn about using us with 529 college plans, doing this instead of bills, where you have more control of the money and it’s off the books.

 

So you qualify for things like that. There’s so many ways to use us but ultimately if you’re going to leverage this, you want to be able to pay the least interest possible. And that’s why we always try to encourage one, make sure you design it like you were talking about earlier and then to make sure we get the lowest interest rate on that collateral loan so that you can actually go and create that double dip effect, making more profit on your life insurance and making more money in your real estate investments.

 

I like that idea though. So we have some plants that are quitting their jobs because this journal stuff works and it allows you to quit your job. But the problem there is you can use that high W2 income and, maybe walking into the bank, talking to somebody with half a brain and putting this on the table as collateral.

 

I’m also worried that they would not just put up in the United States, but they wanted to put in escrow and that another account that might not be as good, but these are the types of things that you can have a conversation with your banker. If you have that personal relationship and kind of put this on the table which again, just speaks to  the validity and the security of this insurance policy.

 

It’s backed by a huge plumber. Sometimes in investing in apartment buildings, themselves to back the collateral. These are just examples overall, like these techniques that we talk about here, or like the 5 29 technique or the whole mortgage technique using this type of stuff that you want to get.

 

People in the weeds doing this type of stuff. Ain’t no banker, ain’t no financial planner. I know you aren’t financial planners at all, but like these guys aren’t, they don’t do this stuff, this comes from interacting with other people and that kind of tinkering. The optimizers. Yeah. It’s, it comes from us having experience doing this kind of stuff, and, cause you’ve got them too.

 

It really does come down to that financial advisors see, understand that financial advisors are not financial experts, right? Even insurance agents are not financial experts. They are just trained by the insurance company or by the financial institution. They work. To teach you what they want to be taught to you.

 

So they’re always going to make it seem like it’s something that’s forever out there. Like even with these infinite banking policies, most people will say their whole life. Oh no. You don’t want to do that. Infinite banking stuff. You want to use this as a supplemental retirement? 30-40 years down the road, not today, not a way to create wealth and pre massive income now.

 

There’s a guy that you and I both know, we won’t mention his name. He’s a fund manager right here. He owns this, as his own fund that he managed. Brilliant guy. And then he told me he had a MetLife whole life policy. He said, oh, I’ve got a whole life policy through MetLife. It’s great. I have been planning for 20 years. And then for 10 years, it’s a tax-free pension. And he’s so happy about it. He’s yeah, I’m putting in 20 grand a year. I’ll be able to pull out 60 grand a year for 10 years. And it’s tax-free and I’m like that’s cool.

 

That’s the traditional way of doing things. Oh, like you’re a fund manager, like this is money. That’s now out of your life that you’re not touching because you’re totally locked up. And I showed them. I said, what if we just made a crappy 10% return on your fund? Which I know he makes way more than that. I was like, what if you just made 10% on your money?

 

And you actually used that money and invested out here while it was still growing inside here. And I showed the same 20 years. The difference was instead of having $60,000 a year tax-free as what the insurance agent taught them at MetLife. He was actually going to get about $178,000, pretty much tax advantage.

 

Because most of it’s for real estate, while the rest of it’s coming from life insurance, the flood insurance income was almost the same. It was extra 120,000 a year of passive income. He was getting from using that same money. And so that’s the thing is that again, these guys are not financial experts.

 

Even the people out there are telling you infinite banking is the way to go be your own banker. And then they. Oh the first year you put in 20,000, you only have 12,000. It’s that 60, 40 split guys. When they try to tell you that’s the best design, I’ll tell you from an investor perspective, I’ve never seen that as designs ever be anything that we’ve done.

 

That’s the kind of promise we always have is that we’ll beat anybody’s numbers out there and the whole 60, 40 split. They’re like, oh, it’s the best way to. But it’s the best way for them to go to still do infinite banking and still get paid more commissions. It’s just, you gotta really be careful of what’s out there.

 

There’s so much misinformation. No wonder Dave Ramsey and Susie Orman think it is a bunch of crap because there’s so many people conflicting with their self-interest or they’re just not taught many insurance companies how to do it right. The first time anyways, because insurance companies have their own self-interest, it’s so hard to find it done the right way.

 

It’s very simple. Like it’s hard for the consumer, like it’s a series summit to a lending broker, right? If I’m trying to shop for mortgages, I get this like term sheets, supposedly, but it’s just all convoluted. And it’s hard for me to pick out the fees that are consistent among agents and et cetera.

 

And what are the variable ones that really should be comparing the rate in this case, you don’t see how they’re going to, configure it with either a 60-40, 90-10, 80-20, but you don’t see that. Until like you, is it that comes on after the physical? Oh no. That’s a total sales tactic.

 

That’s taught out there. Like when I showed you numbers, I showed you them upfront before even putting in an application. And that’s one of our promises while we show the numbers, but there’s a sales tactic out there taught me insurance industry that you only show numbers after you get the approval and they’ll use the excuses, which is a half-truth, they’ll say things like we want to make sure you get the right health ratings.

 

So then we give you real hard enough. But the truth is I can ask you a few questions about your health. And I would say 98% of the time, we’re going to come up pretty close to the right health rating. There’s been a few exceptions where somebody omits some information. I was like, whoa, okay.

 

That’s a different health rating. But for the most part, it’s okay, you’re probably going to be about this health rating. And then the numbers are exactly the way they expect. There’s no mystery. It doesn’t have to be that mystery. So just know that’s a sales tactic. You don’t, you can know numbers upfront and be able to know exactly what.

 

And you want to make sure they’re apples to apples too. That’s another issue that I had with one of our friends. This is, one of his friends, personal friends, they are in the same church and everything. He had two policies with me, and that friend convinced them to try to cancel the two policies with me.

 

And I was like, whoa. And I finally got them on the phone. I was like, what’s going on? Oh he says the numbers are better. I said, listen, I can’t even beat your old numbers, just like your years lane. I couldn’t beat your numbers anymore because you’re older and things change as time goes on, it gets less of a return.

 

I was like, there’s no way he’d beat those numbers. Come to find out the only way he beat those numbers, it wasn’t apples to apples. It was actually him putting in $80,000 more just to catch up. So he would have to cost his family $80,000 just to finally say, oh, look, now I have as much as what I would have had with Chris anyways.

 

And he’s a smart guy.  He owns multiple real estate companies. He has a non-profits smart guy, but again, like you said, you just never know. Because those agents, they don’t always make things apples to apples. You have to really find something you can trust. They’ll say, Hey, this is good. Or this is not that sales technique.

 

I was like shopping for a car and they just wanted me to come in and drive a thing. And I’m like, dude, I don’t want to come in and drive, I have not driven a car. I don’t need to like, feel it, drive it around the block, like wasting my time. But they want me to have some kind of skin in the game for me. Time is my currency.

 

So the same thing, right? You got to go to this BS of having the physical. Have you got to do that eventually, but they want you to do it first with the house. Yeah. That’s it’s the nose. It’s like the camel’s nose in the tent right there. Just trying to get you to walk that path. I remember seeing that in the mortgage industry, when I was mortgage licensed, they would get you to go through the whole process and your rate about time, you’re supposed to close your mortgage.

 

And then they say, oh, by the way, the rates actually lower than I quoted you are not lower, but it’s higher than I quoted you on the mortgage rates. So you’re like do I go back to that other person that could meet low. We’re after this whole month of going through this process, am I just going to go with them?

 

You’re usually going to go with them and that’s the kind of cells that they use in the insurance industry that you really just gotta watch out for. Yeah. So let’s talk a little bit about the downsides of this particular technique in elite. There isn’t anything other than how much, like how much pain and effort and brain damage do you want to go through, like sitting up a little bit better, aftermarket low, if you want to call it.

 

And this is why I ask people. It depends on how big your policy is, right? I think average investors, a lot of investors are putting in maybe a contract book a year for several six years. So let’s just say they have maybe $200,000, maybe even five up and down the vendors to say 200,000, because that makes the back, it.

 

Say they’re getting like a 2% Delta in that better rate. Like 2% of 2000 is what is that? Four or yeah, $4,000 a year. Is that worth it? I dunno. Some people will say that $4,000 is what they spend, going out with some friends, some people will say that’s.

 

One 10th and I can buy a rental property. Probably if you get that big of a policy, you’re probably not buying little rental properties at that point, that’s one 10th that you are going into the next, that’s the one month that you buy in the next deal we have may not be that useful to you.

 

But there is a little bit, maybe talk a little bit about like, all right, so what I do, Chris, I gotta go find the bank. I gotta talk to the person that, let me talk a little about. How much pain is pain. How much time is this? Take this out of here. If you’re trying to do it on your own, it’s going to be a pain in the butt.

 

It’s going to be horrible. That’s why I just tell my clients, listen, just come to us, ask us, like, where’s the best place to go. You go to one bank, you know exactly where you’re going to get the best rate, and just make it easy. Because we always have those relationships too. And we don’t get paid for those relationships.

 

Good connections. It’s a value add for our clients. You bring up a good point: it’s 4,000 bucks worth it on a couple of hundred grand. It’s when you look at a value add deal, when you’re looking to buy an investment property, you’re looking at it.

 

If you just look at it from year one, you’re going to say, okay, Cash flow is okay, but obviously you never do that as an investor. You’re looking at, Hey, what can we do if we start doing value, add stuff and start up the brand on different doors and whatnot and increase the value and the profits, then it starts to build it to be more money.

 

That’s true with life insurance too, because it’s not just that 2% simple. It’s actually a 2% compounding rate that adds to it. So give me a real life example. I was showing some of the difference between putting in a quarter million dollar down payment on a small apartment, right? For a million dollar apartment, quarter million dollars down.

 

Versus, using their savings account versus using their life insurance. Now, if you use this county, you earn 0.1%, which is pretty decent right now. You’re in 0.1% and then you pay taxes on that point. 1%. The crazy thing is after 10 years, right? 10 years of that, that with that 250,000, you ended up actually not even 10, it was nine years, nine years.

 

You only end up profiting about 1200. That’s the, all the interest you made, taking all that cash flow from that property and putting it back in to build up your savings account that you liquidated, because most people just, they take that quarter million dollars. They use that as a down payment and they just take the cashflow to build up their savings slowly over time, and I use the example that you’re only cash flowing 2,500 a month.

 

That same thing. If you’re to do that with life insurance, where instead of paying back into a savings account, you just pay it back towards that line of credit. Now you’re paying down that loan that’s at 3% while you’re earning five plus percent, here’s the difference? Same as count or about 1200 interests.

 

The life insurance in nine years earned 145 grand of it. So it was about a hundred times better, even though yeah. It’s like 0.1 versus 2%. It seemed like it was like 20%, but that compounding effect over those years is huge. And so it’s a no-brainer when you think about it. If I’m going to make 1200 bucks, I might as well make 145 grand.

 

Is that worth, one time, getting something set up and making it easy. And again, if you have team support, like with our team, it makes it easier because you’re not in it by yourself. You’re able to have that stuff. Yeah, and it is the sole financial journey is like it’s a game of inches.

 

These are the little things that kind of get you down the football field to where you want to be, unless your net worth is over a few million dollars. You take it easy at not optimized, but. I bring this up because a lot of people in our family office,  our inner circle. Like we’re a bunch of like over optimizers, which is like propeller hats in a good way.

 

Yeah I got the one hand, like the dude with his little teeny tiny, like 10, $20,000 policy, like really how much money does this equate to. But then again, that’s the person that needs to be doing this type of nonsense, you’re saying, right? This is the person that needs every single little inch because they need to get down the football field point.

 

So he knows I didn’t bring up the strategy that some people talk about online when they talk by internet banking, which is using this like your own check checking account, right? Like your own bill pay account. And they’re trying to pay all their monthly expenses. That, to me, that is you’re trying to get an inch.

 

It’s just not worth it. Like you save, you might make. A few hundred bucks or so a year and interest, despite trying to pay all your bills using this and money’s going in and out, back and forth. That to me is ridiculous. Oh, are they just setting that up? Cause people will do that with their Healogics, right?

 

Somehow they’re able to pay their bills. And I think he looks a little easier. You could do it with life insurance, but the problem is this is that the insurance salesman, they’re trying to sell it to you. And I do say salesman when I say it, because they’ll try to say, yeah all your income goes into this.

 

And they said the humongous policies first off you’ve pretty much have to lie. On the application, just to be able to put in that much, because most companies won’t let you put in more than 25% of your stated gross income every year. For someone that says put in their whole paycheck, they’d have to say I’m putting a hundred percent of my income.

 

That’s that they would never go for that. And insurance companies will never say yes to that. So theoretically it sounds great. But as much as bull. And then when you really ask those insurance sales and I’m like how do I really fund this every year? Oh, we just put your whole paycheck into it.

 

That all that does is just make this huge, massive policy that you’re paying a crap load and insurance costs too, and getting very little benefit. It’s not worth it. You really have to have a lot of surplus cash to do that. And like I said, like just that strategy alone really just doesn’t save you much money and same thing with he locked the velocity banking, that kind of thing.

 

From a number standpoint and calculator sure. It might make sense to a little bit, but what’s the time, what’s the cost of your time and energy is one, two. What about reality? My, for example, doesn’t work like this. Isn’t a much of a threat with your life insurance because life insurance it’s guaranteed.

 

Banks are willing to lend against them, but on a house, if you tried to get a hilar and you try to charge it up and then pay it down and aggressively really fast, the risk you run, especially when times get hard and recessionary times is that those banks will take those lines of credit, but limits and cut them down to your bank.

 

They will break them, cut them all the way back. So all that money you paid into it you just pull it back out again. It’s gone. So in a practicality standpoint, even though, yes, I know I can save interest on a heloc by paying it down. I don’t, I leave it maxed out. I let it stay up at the limit because I know banks cause I watched it happen in the last recession.

 

To me personally, banks will cut down your lines of credit and not give you a warning. Now with life insurance, the good thing is they don’t worry about market risks. They don’t worry about your house depreciating. It’s not based on that. So you really don’t have that kind of threat. So it’s a different game.

 

And that’s the one big point why this IBC stuff is superior to the helocs getting out there. But yeah, some of this takes a little time, but first they seems like a lot of work to me, but, I was also the guy at one time who would like, those rewards credit cards or debit cards where you get to do 12 transactions while I would go to four different gas stations out in the freezing cold, I’d do three at a time.

 

If not, they would show off my card. I would also fly back from life, get out. I was being like Montana, wherever, but I would fly out of. I forgot what it was, Denver or salt lake, but we’d always go through there to go back to Seattle, but I would always go to the more farther one to get more miles so stupid. All these layovers and you’re tired all the time. I like simplicity. I think simplicity really means that energy saver is the ultimate ROI. You can use these strategies and get really complex with them. I like to use them just for the bigger stuff. The stuff that really makes it makes an impact.

 

That really makes a difference. Everything else doesn’t even have to become a master app.  You don’t have to be that smart just to be able to use this in a simple way, which is I’m gonna use this money and invest if that, and just take the cash flow and use the paid bachelors in my line of credit.

 

And that’s all you do. Yeah. I think the one thing I liked is Chris does coaching. So Chris he’s really good. He’s a lot more patient than I am. And there were actually a couple of people this last week, I talked to Chris that we’re like, all this stuff we’re talking about is like the sand and they have big rocks, which are problems, right?

 

They have $500 million plus of dead equity in their house. This stuff we’re talking about is like the way high up in the tree for them for now. But they just, a lot of people, especially people who’ve been doing this long. But people have harder, worse habits, money habits who think that they should have big equity positions in their house.

 

It’s just a big mindset shift. And so I was like mentioning, yeah, I should go work with Chris because Chris will actually hold your hand and walk you through this type of stuff. Where I’m a little bit more impatient and it’s what’s the problem here. See what, they’re all they’re doing it.

 

Here’s this group we’re doing it. Jump off the cliff too, in a way but yeah, Chris once you get your contact information or how can people get a hold of you? Yeah, two different ways. You can do that. And I’m one, you can always follow our own podcast. We have a podcast called the Chris Miles Money Show that you find on iTunes, YouTube, wherever you go for podcasts.

 

And then you can also go to our website moneyripples.com. And we even have a playlist on infinite banking that’s on there. You can go and check out and be able to watch different videos and learn and go deeper down that rabbit hole. If you want to take the red pill. All right, folks. Thanks for listening. Join the club, check out the website simplepassivecashflow.com/club. I will see you guys next.

Pruning your rentals + Outsouring debt with Enrich Author Todd Miller

https://youtu.be/6miTMi4nClw

Now on this podcast, you’re going to be hearing me interview an author that wrote about, enriched about building wealth over time.  There were a few things in this interview that I clashed over. Here’s the thing, like a lot of these authors, it’s nothing to take much to write a book these days. I’ve done it. You guys can check it out and on Amazon and it ends up an Amazon bestseller. Thank you to those of you guys who dropped in on it. The title is the Journey to Simple Passive Cashflow and you can check that on Amazon by the way, but, I think the thing that we’re clashing on is, this guy was saying, you should file these properties and pay them all down, which is a very logical strategy for most people.

 

But again, you never want to be like most people, cause that’s typically maybe not the best way of doing things, And I’ve been trying to distill this down to different thought processes. Is it debt? Is it more loan to value? If you guys didn’t listen to me, some of my rants on this. Loan to value is some arbitrary number. To me, what it comes down to this year, debt, service, coverage ratio, what are your monthly payments to pay the debt service and what is your cash flow?

 

And if you want to go, how the professionals do, what the banks do when they underwrite our deals, they want to see that 1.25. you’re dead surfaces, a hundred dollars. They want to see $125 of cash flow coming in. So that there’s a bit of a margin there. Now you can artificially create that debt, service coverage higher by putting more down payment on which do you guys know?

 

That’s not what sophisticated investors do. They put the least amounts to get that cash flow and that returns as high as they can, but keeping that debt, service coverage ratio, right at that optimal point at around like 1.1, 1.25, I think that’s, one could argue that it’s better to be higher, you give up some of those returns.

 

So that’s where you are as an investor. And personally, I’ve been on this journey where I was big on tertiary markets, Which have higher caps. Now the problem with higher caps and the reason why they’re higher caps is they’re not as staple locations to invest in. I probably  was one to say that I’ll never invest in Hawaii or California because of the low caps.

 

And, they don’t cash flow in cash flow is what you need in a case of recession to hold onto the asset. But yeah. The good thing about those kinds of markets like New York, Chicago, Miami, Hawaii, Seattle, and all of California is that it’s a very stable place, people want to live there and you have to look at both sides of the argument there.

 

So where I’m thinking as you’re new, as your net worth grows over $5- $10 million. Now you start to get away from the tertiary markets. For sure, it gets to more the secondary and the primary market, probably with the primary markets overall, which is why I probably still won’t invest there at this point in my life.

 

And my journey is because there’s just so much competition in most areas. There’s so much, dump on sophisticated money in Hawaii, Seattle, LA, Where they’re just people just buying properties, reporting on it too, for legacy that those are the kind of people that push up the pricing. And that’s a second layer to this. No, there’s a few things to be thinking about. And I think this is where, you really need a network and this is all we tell people, Hey, if you’re stuck, if you’re tired of just dealing with people who just don’t understand investing on this level, join the family office, Ohana mastermind group of, or details in that go to simplepassivecashflow.com/journey.

 

And before we get going into today’s interview with this author, I had a question. It seems like a lot of the investors are worried about interest rates coming up  and I think yes, it does really impact the numbers. If you’re a buy, hold and pray type of investor. And I was a buy, hold and pray type of investor from 2009 to 2015, when I was just buying these little single family home turnkeys. if you guys want to go download the analyzer at simplepassivecastle.com/analyzer, you can download the spreadsheet and you play around with the numbers. you change the interest rates from 4.5% to 5% or maybe five and a quarter. And you’ll see that cash flow drop, maybe you’re at $300 and it drops to seventy-five bucks by making that one little move on the spreadsheet, and I think most of our investors understand this sensitivity analysis when interest rates do make these bigger jumps. 

 

But, this is why I’ve personally gravitated towards value-added types of real estate as we all know wealth comes to those who create value and value can be in the form of many things. And, but ultimately the bottom line in real estate, and how much net operating income does a property produce or in the business world, increasing your Vita. Now, when you are increasing. The value add or the, when your value adds a property, increasing  rents per se, and you’re increasing that net operating income. It makes the interest rate that holding costs less of an important factor to use in an extreme case, like a house flipper. House flippers  don’t care what he’s paying for his debt service; the good ones will, they’ll be able to cherry pick lazy investor money at 8%, maybe 10%. 

 

Beware, If you’re one of those people who take on, lend money to house flippers, and you’re getting 15, 20%, you’re likely going through a middle man who’s selling your basic linear money through an unproven party. That’s why you’re getting paid so much but that’s a side note. I don’t want to invest in private money notes. I don’t invest with people who are less than five, $10 million net worth these days. Just net worth is a level of sophistication, in my opinion, these days for me. That’s just the class of paper that you’re buying, Because when you have those higher rates of return, even if you’re collateralized with the house flipping project, it doesn’t matter. But I digress. So getting back to my point, these house flippers, they really don’t care what they pay for their cost of, 10%, 20%.

 

It doesn’t matter because they’re buying a property say for 300, you’re putting in a hundred grand in and they’re flipping it 4, 5, 600, maybe even more so that holding cost is, maybe on the scale of 10, 20, $30,000, if in that six month project per se. So that’s an extreme case, And when they’re holding onto a property for one to five years That interest doesn’t really matter. Yes. It piles up. And it’s part of, you can definitely see it in your monthly P and L’s, but if you’re value adding that piece of property, whether that’s a home  flip in that house with burst case where their value adding at 200 grand, you can see how that Brittany trumps that holding costs, maybe even a tenfold.

 

Now, I like the approach of going into stabilized assets where there’s existing cash flow. No light to moderate value add and nothing crazy. definitely I would be on the less on the side of the spectrum of that house flipper, where they’re going after huge amounts of value add, and they could care less about the interest rates, still not to that extreme, but still this my point is that the interest rates don’t really matter as much when you’re doing value. If you don’t trust me, go look at how much money is built up through the routine equity, the net operating income divided by the cap rate in the beginning of the project, and to presume cap net operating income at the end of the project, divided by the prevailing cap rate and the difference of the money made.

 

And then see how much the debt service compares to that. And I think what you’ll see in most value add projects is the carrying costs of the interest costs. Sure. it’s hurting your monthly P and L and your cash flows, but it is a very small relation to the bigger gain. I would say these days, even with a lot of light value add projects, the majority of the money, let’s just call it two thirds, is coming from the retained equity, build up the value, add pop at the end, as opposed to the cash flow. I think back in the day, maybe like 2015, I was seeing deals like in Memphis, which are tertiary markets that I don’t want to invest in which garbage areas, but they have high cash flow and really not as much value add in a separate project because. The location sucks, let’s just call it that in those cases, you would see deals where maybe half of the returns were coming through cash flow, or maybe a little bit more and the smaller portion.

 

So a large portion is coming to routine equity through the years. But, I think that’s why some investors who haven’t caught onto this concept, they feel. Okay. These investors are a little capital area. They’re still doing stuff in the face of all these industries. but when you really look at the numbers again, what is the routine equity portion versus the cashflow portion?

 

You start to realize. Yeah,  who cares about paying a little bit more on interest payments because that’s nothing compared to the end goal of, unfortunately you have to wait maybe several years to realize that. For newer investors, lower net worth investors. They may not feel comfortable with it, but as we always tell investors,  you need to start acting like an accredited investor and more, which is more of a long term for license credit investors who don’t really care what is happening on a monthly, quarterly, or even annual basis.

 

They look at things more on a two, three year time horizon or three to five years. So they zoom out. And when you look on that side, when you’re looking from those lens, Now you’re looking at more, they care more about what is their equity, how’s their net growing over time, as opposed to are they getting their monthly cash flow so they can pay the bills because affluent people, wealthy people accredited plus investors, they got their bills.

 

Take care of, they’ve got that cash flow already. If you’ve got that bass. So their primary concern is, of course, keeping their money, which is why they invest in real estate because it holds its value. And it goes up with the pace of inflation. But they like it because they can add value, and they can realize these huge racks of big gains, but they gotta wait for it. But, I think that’s a difference between, less sophisticated investors who really enjoy getting those monthly paychecks from the rent checks, from their tenants, and all that type of stuff to more of a sophisticated investor who is able to zoom out the little detach, but really compare the two investment strategies on a longer time horizon. 

 

But yeah, I’m pretty confident interest rates will come up a little bit more, but, I think things will subside and that is why we’re taking a little bit of a break. And especially because we’re seeing a lot of newbies getting into real estate and investments and apartments and like the other day I saw like a deal going up for like 120,000 a unit.

 

And the pitch deck was saying, they’re going to value adding it to you. It’s 200,000. I’m like, dude, that’s not going to happen. And that’s the kind of the stuff that’s happening all the time makes me think,  maybe the king of the door has closed, or it’s, just operate what we got.

 

But then again, like you always got to do something, I think that’s the mistake is to, yeah. Especially coming from new investors  who haven’t done Jack or at any point is they’re always looking for that excuse not to do anything. And I think that’s the one thing that inflation has really illustrated to a lot of folks, myself included, that you just can’t stick your money in the bank account, doing nothing.

 

Now the next level up is putting it into an infinite banking plan, making 5% tax-free. I think that’s better than nothing. And I think as somebody who’s pretty conservative, I think that’s the next great option. If you don’t know what infinite banking is, check out our free. I think it’s like a three hour eCourse at simplepassivecashflow.com/banking. you got to sign up to get access to that e-course but there’s a little info page for you guys to read up on the concept, but, enjoy the show guys. And if you guys have any other questions, please submit it over and we’ll see you next time. 

 

Today, we have the author of Enriched, Todd Miller. We’ll be talking about various topics surrounding wealth, time, money and meaning, but Todd, why don’t you quickly go over your step journey towards financial independence from the beginning.

 

Hi Lane, sure. Happy to do that. And it’s really a pleasure for me. Be a part of this community and to be here with you this afternoon, by professional background, I am an entertainment executive. I’ve worked for an, in Hollywood for half of my life and my career rocked and I actually did not realize the importance of creating and accelerating financial security.

 

Until years into the career. When I had successfully reached the proverbial corner office and was miserable and I was handicapped by my financial insecurity. And that’s when I recognized that financial security is foundational and most people think of it as the end point. The ultimate prize for a long and perhaps even punishing me professional path.

 

And to me, it’s the starting point. And the sooner a professional can accelerate financial security, the more and the quicker and better that one can scaffold a life of meaning and importance and relevance and enrichment, which is ultimately where everyone wants to be. I retired about two years ago and don’t look back. 

 

What is it that you can look back on that kind of pushed you over the edge and pissed you off? Or what was that thing? People always have that thing that they could point to. I think we have to back up and I’ve been obsessed with the work-life equation and how to maximize that equation, really for twenty-five decades.

 

And I would say that my whole journey with optimizing work in life, that began in my final semester at Columbia business school, when I was flabbergasted, how many of my brilliant classmates seem to be making an incredibly foolish and short-term career decisions based on us, based on the size of a signing bonus.

 

In other words, choosing company A over company B because company A gives a couple more thousand dollars upfront and that is really puzzling. No, that was widespread behavior at the time. And I thought, can we be bought so easily? Am I missing something in this? And the deeper I progressed in my career with a Hollywood studio, I guess I was fortunate to have a series of events which caused me to be hyper aggressive about getting work and life to work together. 

 

And I quickly figured out the work-life balance thing and my life rocked, my career rocked and everything was going well until my priorities changed. My company also changed. And, I just found that the higher I climbed on the corporate ladder, just the more distant I felt from all the things that attracted me to the business and to the industry and to the role.

 

I guess for me, the pivotal moment was I was hoping to get fired and to receive a parachute. Yeah. So where did this idea come from? Why did you want to get fired?  I was miserable and I no longer enjoyed my work. But yet I was addicted to the paycheck. What was worse? The people or the job work that you did?

 

I would say it was the culture because of the politics. What exactly? Trying to peel back the onion here, trying to get some emotion and get, not get high level, like where we are. Look the higher you go, really the less exposed you are to the actual business. And I found that I was spending most of my day, every day, on a lot of nonsense internal issues.

 

Most of it was political issues. Just as such as territorial control. Hey, this is my responsibility, or, differently in Hollywood, there are many ambitious executives, everyone’s trying to grab a piece of the pie from someone else and jump over other people.

 

And just a lot of the days were spent in corporate in basically survival mode, trying to take down someone else, and just really just trying to score points internally, as opposed to actually advancing the business and looking at the situation that I am describing in a particular Hollywood context.

 

It’s relatable to many industries in a corporate America, whether it’s Silicon valley or wall street, that at some point in particularly at more senior positions, the political dynamics tend to outweigh and overshadow  the real business of the business, and that was what I found myself in, and I found that the company made decisions, not based on meritocracy, but really, because someone shine someone’s shoes.

 

And I was just, I became disillusioned with that situation, and that led. Increasingly that just led to a disconnect between what I wanted, and the reality of this job, but I couldn’t walk away from the job because I’ve benefited from a very hype high paycheck. And I have mouths to feed, and a family to support, and so the reality of having to grin and bear it, so to speak, that really. It really tended to overshadow everything else. And as much as I had worked on a work-life balance, because I did not have this financial security, I was not in a happy place. And so I was expecting, hoping to be fired and looking forward to the occasion.

 

A kid looks forward to Christmas. And rather than that, it was business as usual and more of the same, and I And I remember this one, it never rains in Southern California, but on this particular day in Los Angeles, it was a downpour. And I left the studio around 6:00 PM. I got in my car, I’m driving to my hotel.

 

I called my father and said, I didn’t get fired. And I was just, explosive and that’s really, it’s a very mentally unhealthy place and unhappy place to be in. And after I basically extricate myself from that very toxic situation, I then made accelerating financial security a primary priority.

 

And I was able to fast track that in a relatively short amount of time, and that changes everything, and so the point I’m trying to make to you and to this audience is that often many professionals subscribe. To the trappings of professionals. So success and career aligning, and it’s often that we don’t recognize the importance of creating financial security as quickly as possible because there’s this solution sometimes correctly, sometimes fall asleep.

 

That one has the security of a great and well Payne. But tying financial security to job security is a very risky business and particularly so for very successful professionals. And so the biggest insight that I’ve learned is to always, not depend upon, any other organizations.

 

For my livelihood. So you didn’t get fired. So what kind of transpired, cause eventually you’ve mentioned, you got to FII about five years. How did you make Pasadena. Yeah. So I took, it took several weeks after that, that horrible experience in Los Angeles for me to extricate myself from the company, but I did, I went on sabbatical which was just an incredible experience, and basically reset myself, reset my.

 

My career, my aspirations, joined another company as chief executive and began a second professional life in a business, in an industry that I truly enjoyed at the time. And so as soon as I was on that second career, I then prioritized building financial security through real estate.

 

And while all this was transpiring, I was living and working in Hong Kong. Yet I managed to build, house by house, a modest single family, real estate portfolio. In the United States. And, so I took many trips to the U S. Some of these were family trips and many people went to Disneyland while the Millers went to California and we went house hunting.

 

We left with the souvenir to have a house under contract on business trips to Los Angeles. I wouldn’t leave LA until. Had a house under contract. And so trip by trip year by year, I was able to establish this portfolio of single family homes that really created the foundation for me to achieve FYI and to no longer have to work, in order to.

 

To support my family, I got more sophisticated as I got along, but certainly the pivotal point was building that property port portfolio by remote control from Hong Kong. How many assets, average rents, average or just price a little bit. Did you do any rehab or anything? No.

 

So I very much focus on, oh, w let me take a step back. I always believe in focusing on where you want to end up and then working back to the. And generally whether it’s a financial goal, whether it’s a personal goal or a career goal, I think that’s a good process to adapt. And so my objective in building this property portfolio is to build layers and layers of passive cash.

 

And I w I put a premium on passivity, which means that I want this experience to be as hassle free as possible. And as a result of that, I focused on the ideal demographic that I wanted to rent to. And then I asked myself, what kind of property would appeal to that demographic. And as a result of that thought process, I focus on middle to upper middle class, single family homes.

 

And, depending upon where you are in the country, that means different things in different places. But I started originally in Southern California and, and I completely outsource everything with respect to the actual running of these homes. Again, my goal is high pacivity and Melissa and over the rents being brought down average.

 

Yeah. So starting in Southern California, the purchase prices range because I did this over a number of years from $330,000. Ultimately to about $430,000 and the rents associated with that, range from 2200 or so to to currently about 2,600. And so it’s, and I have a number of properties that fall within that range in terms of the cash on cash yield. It has been less spectacular than other parts of the country where I now invest.

 

But the appreciation on those homes in California, and particularly at the timing of the. That’s been quite good. And so once I purchased a number of homes in California I felt that doing that, building that portfolio in California had run its course. And so I then started building a secondary portfolio in Kentucky.

 

How many houses did you get into California before you moved? So I kept at four. And then and right now they’re doing 80% on the value debt. No I am, I have a toxic relationship to debt. And we can talk about that, but I am all like, Okay. So you’re a hundred percent cash in those types of things.

 

Yeah, let’s talk about it. Most times out, I like to use as much debt as I can, as much as I cash it all. But yeah, walk me through the thought process. Wouldn’t you be able to take, you had maybe what, a $400,000 five policies. How much equity was there two mil to two in California?

 

Yeah. So the whole goal, again, you have to think about what the outcome is, what the desired outcome is. And for me, it was important to build financially. And so let’s talk about what that means. Most people think that financial security is a number, a goal, but actually financial security is an emotional state. It’s how you think about money. And for me,

 

I do not want to have it. Or have any anxieties about, about owing something to a third party. And so part of what enables me to sleep well at night is to know that I have zero down. And that helps me sleep well at night. And that is a personal choice, but I went to business school and I completely understand the financial benefits of leverage, which is why I outsource my leverage.

 

So I try to harness the benefits of leverage without that being in my book. And so in addition to these single family homes, I also invest in private placements, both equity and debt, as well as some closed end funds and all three of those financial categories, they utilize that. And if I’m doing a PE investment, I would much rather prefer.

 

That the sponsor gets institutional rates and gets the benefit of debt and have that debt on their books rather than on my books. And so through these private equity, private debt and closed in fund investments, I outsource this level. And so that’s my way of trying to harness some of the benefits of leverage without compromising, ultimately my peace of mind, which ultimately affects my financial security.

 

Yeah. And I think that’s exactly what a lot of our community does. Most of our credit investors are getting rid of their rental properties, going into private placements, that syndication circles, the key principle. Name what are your thoughts on, another reason why they do that, so they don’t get dead in their own name, but it’s also the liability, because right now, even if it’s an LLC you’re pro everybody knows right where to see you. They can look it up and they know exactly where your equity is and how much you have. What is your thought process on that side? Yeah. Yeah. And so it’s important to basically. Wrap these assets into a couple of protective layers.

 

And so one would be some kind of corporate entity, and legally that’s hard to puncture, but not impossible. And then on top of that to get some umbrella insurance, at a pretty high level. And so those are the two ways that I’ve been able to do that, to try to insulate myself. Again, going back to that demographic point that I was making, because I focus on middle to upper middle class homes.

 

That also attracts a certain kind of demographic that hopefully mitigates some potential litigation risk because I would respectfully disagree. That’s why we invest in workforce health. These, it’s not in the state of California, which is the litigation capital of the country, but also a lot of our tenants, they just are not, they just can’t muster a lawsuit.

 

And a lot of times the lawsuit it’s, whoever can power it and pay most for low legal fees. Yeah. Yeah. So I look, I have great tenants. I’m a good landlord. Most of my tenants have been with me for very long stretches of time. All of my properties are very professionally managed.

 

The management companies proactively make sure that the properties are in good order, and I invest in the property. And ultimately, and I believe that if you try to conduct yourself in the right way, ultimately that’s the best that you can do. Yeah, no I would agree with that.

 

But the rental property is just one small part of the portfolio. You mentioned private placements, to what would you say would be the asset allocation X between the direct owners. Too. I like your terminology, the outsource kind of debt or the outsource asset management.

 

I, so I truly put a premium on passivity and I belong. I believe in relying on professionals who have much more specialized expertise than I have. Whether that be tax professionals or whether that be property management professionals, insurance specialists. And I essentially, after I started building these single families and after massing about a dozen single family homes, I basically hit a threshold where I said, No.

 

W when I ask myself, do I want to make this bigger? And I could very much make it bigger and I can double the number of doors, direct doors that I have, but I don’t want to create another job. I left a very high paying job. And so Y.

 

I sold them off. Yeah. Let’s hear it. Why create that? But having said that, I, I like, and maybe it’s my Asian background, where people really. Prize and respect, physical real estate. That’s why I keep the single family homes as part of the portfolio. And I would say that part of the portfolio in terms of my income, because that’s really how I measure things accounts for about 40% of my.

 

But on top of that, I then layer it with private equity, private debt. And I have a very strong position in fonts, and so overall about two thirds of my portfolio is positioned and weighted toward real estate. But I also do invest in them primarily. Muni bond funds. And that is for liquidity and for diversification, just because so much of my portfolio is otherwise committed through long-term real estate investments, whether that’s private placement or during.

 

Okay. So the rental properties are just a bit of a tip of the iceberg in a way. I’m assuming, do you ever look to sell any of them or prune the prune, that part of the portfolio a little bit? I do. In fact, I’m in the process of doing, or at least staging one cell now. I am pruning the California properties.

 

For some of the reasons that you’ve mentioned before, the properties have appreciated extremely well, but they’re just not cash flowing relative to other productive uses for. For that value, like that is contained. And you’ve got a portfolio and Kentucky, as you mentioned, are you thinking about making it more into California properties or different geographic locations?

 

So I very much believe that one should try to have a little bit of specialization, early on. When I was building my portfolio, I actually thought I’d buy a place in LA. I’ll buy a place in Seattle. And basically, every market of the day, I thought, let me buy a place.

 

But I realized that’s crazy and for a small retail individual investor, it just doesn’t make sense. I very much believe in creating some modest economies of scale, which is why for direct investments, I focused on those two geographies and on nurturing an ecosystem of trusted experts.

 

That I can completely lie on and rely on to manage them. And so I am in the process of, and this is a multi-year process of exiting my California exposures. And, I don’t think I’m going to add any more. To Kentucky, because, currently in terms of a diverse diversification perspective, I’m concerned about concentration risk.

 

And so I’m trying to figure it out. As we speak, what to do, where to basically direct that money. And I haven’t conclusively landed on, on, on that last year. And by remote control because I was locked down in Thailand, I did a 10 31 from California and I bought sight-unseen three investment homes and.

 

And I did that because I had this reliable network of professionals who I’ve worked with now for a number of years, that they could be the boots on the ground. And that enabled me to do that 10 31 and basically convert one California home into three Kentucky properties, and that’s the way the math works.

 

So still on the fence of, you’re going to sell some of the California rentals one by one slowly, but you haven’t decided yet if it’s going to go back into more California properties or a different tertiary market or secondary, it definitely will not be recycled into California.

 

And so ultimately I will Lexic California, any couple markets, you’ve thought. Yeah. So I’m looking at Birmingham. I’m actually looking at DC, which is where I am at the moment. But I am also looking at DSTs at Delaware statute, statutory trust as well as opportunity zones as an alternative to buying direct properties.

 

And so I am in a diligence process on all those options. Yeah. So this is for folks listening, like DC is definitely a primary market like California, we’re very low rent to value ratios, lower cap rates. For Todd, this is a very different situation, right? His end game scenario is not an immediate growth.

 

But that’s why you invest for low caps for security and capital preservation in those types of markets. I would say today, if you were going to do that in DC and buy these higher end homes, it wouldn’t be a bad idea to do a cost SEG before 2022, before long, lock in those losses, just bank it on an 82 84 form for now.

 

But I know it seems like you’re still undecided, whether they’re going to go, the lower Capri type of market or Birmingham, I am. And I have a few months where I have a runway for me to figure this out. Yeah. I’ve got a couple of properties in Birmingham. I’m sure. Love to unload if you’d like to buy.

 

Yeah. So Birmingham was one of the markets where I originally bought rental properties, but I’m on private placements, syndications that mostly operate at this point. Great. These are like the conversations pruning our portfolios that want to be safe, siphoning it around a little bit, never staying stagnant, but never making wholesale changes.

 

I, one year I sold two properties in Seattle, bought Knight out of state. That’s a little, wholesale change right there in line change if you hockey fans out there. But these are the, what Todd is doing is very. Prudent and if there are ways to do it right, it’s very good, it’s very incremental.

 

It’s cautious, it’s defensive, but it works. And again, I think every investor has to ask, do I want to build a business or do I want to build a financial sector? And those are two different things. And depending upon how you answer that will then dictate how you scale and structure your investments.

 

So again, Todd is the author of Enrich. What are like a couple of big takeaways from the book, just to give people a little teaser to talk. Sure. So Enrich is about creating wealth in time, money and meaning, and because I’ve been obsessed with this work-life equation for a quarter century through my research, I identified three very common and pressing goals, which tend to.

 

Just Sapp, the life out of life for professionals. And these three core challenges are financial insecurity, time, poverty, and a disconnect in priorities. And so we’ve discussed financial insecurity and how to pay a paycheck. And job security does not create financial security in terms of time poverty. This is a pervasive problem among professionals Ernst and young says that insufficient time accounts for four of the five biggest hurdles that professionals face.

 

And so the third core challenge is this perpetual disconnect between how professionals wish that they could spend their day versus how they actually spend their day. And there’s this demoralizing gap between what we wish that we could be doing. And you know how we actually live our days. And that explains the deep funk that I was in when I was working at that Hollywood studio.

 

And I was demoralized when I thought it’s fire, because just how I was spending my days didn’t relate to what was important to me at that time. And so with those three core challenges, what I encouraged. Readers of this book want to create optionality. So that work becomes a choice and not an obligation and to take control of their lives through intentionality, which is, can you give an example?

 

Of intentionality, right? Yes it’s really about being deliberate and purposeful in how you spend your time. And so a great example is, and what I encourage every listener of this podcast to do is to wake up the most. And ask yourself what will make today a great day, not a good day, not another Wednesday day, but what will make today a great day.

 

And to consider that question on our personal dimension, on a professional dimension and on a financial domain. And then with deliberateness to go about and to accomplish whatever it is that you identified that will make this day a great day. That’s what it means to live intentionally. And so goals and goal setting and goal achievement.

 

They all keep, they actually occupy about a third of. And I dive deeply into the science of goal setting and goal achievement, because it’s so important, but it’s especially important at this moment in time to take control, because one of the biggest facets of this pandemic has been a perceived loss of control.

 

Where events and situations just tend to undermine and supersede everything. And at an individual level, particularly in lockdown, we have a little control. And so at a time when the world seems out of control, it’s mighty important to take control. Where we can in our lives. And that is the power of intentionality.

 

So maybe just give us some examples of you shoot, you’ve seen people make, because I think people understand so liberally that yeah, I got a great life. How I want it today. This is the ideal. But the problem I think people run into is myself included. At some point we’re just running on autopilot and we just lack the imagination to know what those things are, right?

 

Like what, there’s a governor on a lot of us. Yes. I call that the default setting and most of us are not aware of that default setting. It sets. Usually around college time when we’re in college and when we’re in college, we’re directed toward careers. And once we start climbing the ladder, we then spend much effort climbing as fast and as high as we can.

 

Without ever surveying whether or not the ladder leans against the right wall. And part of this default setting is that we implicitly subscribe to a 40 year ultra marathon. To create some degree of financial incision of financial freedom. In other words, we embarked upon our careers in our twenties and we hope to exit if we’re lucky sometime in our sixties.

 

And then we think we’ll be able to live the life that we wish we could have been living all along. How crazy is that? But that is the default setting for which most people unconsciously operate. And so the first step is to recognize the default setting and to recognize that often the juice doesn’t justify the squeeze and then to reject.

 

That default setting, but to be able to reject the default city, you’d need to have something aspiring, something inspirational to work too. And that’s where the notion of life planning and goal setting and goal achievement come into play. Let me give you a great example. So I was in my mid twenties, a few years out of business school.

 

My life was rocking. My career was rocking. I had just paid off all my student loans and I had just spent this amazing three week holiday in Africa with my family. And life, Life was almost perfect. And I was headed back home after this amazing vacation with my family and I was in Dubai at three o’clock in the morning about to board a flight back to the real world.

 

And I asked myself though, do I just go back to more of the same. Or do I go back with some intention and some purpose because I just felt directionless. And so on a scratch piece of paper on the floor of the airport, I scribbled out very long-term aspirations that I had. And once I got back into the office, a few days later, I really looked at that scratch piece of paper, made a couple edits and those aspirations became the first iteration of a life plan.

 

And. I’ve enlarged and developed this life planning system over a number of years, but it’s now become my central operating system and the whole process about making the time to understand what you really value. To understand what your priorities are and then to identify what makes an enriched and meaningful life for you just going through that thought process and articulating a few key aspirations that in itself is a very powerful process.

 

And by the notion of. Laying out what the biggest priorities are in life and then directing your focus toward those priorities. That really is the essence of living intentionally and creating this life of time, money, and meaning, which we all aspire to. What observation there you got out of your noble setting, right?

 

On occasion, you’re able to get out of your default setting. God gave you that traction to do that little exercise. Yes. But I think more than more importantly until that moment, my goals had been, career. Get rid of all my student debt, and I had kinda, and those were modest goals, but I had knocked them all off.

 

And without some team larger for me to work toward too, it was that feeling of directionless, NUS. And yes, getting out of my comfort zone was a great catalyst to recognize. But, I think that we all need to know what we’re working toward because to paraphrase Yogi Berra, if you don’t know where you’re going, you just might not get there with the Trisha CAC. Jessica the cat said something similar, right? You don’t know where you’re going. I can’t tell you where you go, where you are. Something like that. Cool. Yeah, folks want to check out the book. Enrich is the title by Todd Miller, website enrich one-on-one dot com. But any parting words, thought, look I think that, we as investors, we as a nation have been through a traumatic experience over the past year and a half. 

 

And the partying concept that I would like to leave for your audience is do we return to normal or do we aspire to something richer and better? And I would encourage everybody to begin to incorporate the practice of intentionality in their daily lives so that we can go as individuals and as a community to a richer and better normal.

 

Well said yeah. I think most people listening, you guys have already realized that there’s something might be better out there. If not, you wouldn’t have Googled simple passive cashflow, you and haven’t downloaded a podcast. So I think a lot of you guys are heading in the right direction, but keep going on that momentum and pick up Todd’s book Enrich.

 

Again, like Todd says, you have to find something that pulls you, but you gotta figure out what the heck that is. Do the exercises. I also have you guys go to simplepassivecashflow.com/goals. There’s a little worksheet there that you guys can download. And I think we did this in 2019 and 2020.

 

I did a video tutorial. You guys can pull that on the website. I will also say that in the book that I include 11 exercises that relate to different aspects of many of the themes that we have discussed, but that really this book Enrich, goal setting goal achieved. Is such an important process to actually fulfill and create the life that we all aspire to.

 

Everybody. Thanks for listening guys. You only take this stuff so far on podcasts and books. Join the community. Simplepassivecashflow.com/club. See you guys out in real life. One of these days. And if you haven’t yet connected with me, shoot me an email at Lane@simplepassivecashflow.com. Book your onboarding call, and we’ll see you guys next week.